blake6900

I can't wait for the usual suspects to blow smoke about how Brooks had nothing to do with losing this game. Forget the fumbles, how many QBs do you know that call an audible and then take a sack. If this moron had a brain he'd still be dumber than a stump. The Saints should have signed him to an incentive-laden contract, a very simple one: he should get paid when the Saints win and not when they don't. Then he could prove whether or not he's one of the top 5 QBs in the league because ever since he made that silly statement , he's gone on to prove he isn't.

This past week he stated he ran more (and, strangely was more successful) during the year he took over for Jeff Blake because he didn't know the offense that well. Now he supposedly knows the offense and he stinks. Someone oughtta arrest him for larceny because he's stealing money from the Saints' organization. They're paying Todd Bouman a million bucks this year so they might as well play him. They should bench Brooks (so he doesn't get hurt) and then next year hope they can find some team stupid enough (like some folks frequenting this website) to take him off their hands. Since he's making big money that's probably not likely but, because we're Saints fans, if we ain't got hope, we ain't got nothin'.



Situational awareness? Even if this guy could spell that term he wouldn't have the faintest idea what it means. Passing statistics are great only if a team wins. The Saints do not necessarily win with Brooks at the helm (look at their record with him as a starter) and the sooner Haslett figures that out the more likely he is to keep his job. Otherwise he's a goner...and rightfully so.

[Edited on 24/11/2003 by ColdFusion]