01-27-2011, 02:55 PM
|
#17
|
10000 POST CLUB
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bossier City, LA
Posts: 26,484
|
Originally Posted by neugey
You know, the more I think about it, maybe we should be blaming the television executives. Why in the world would they sign a contract to pay the NFL money even if no games are played on their stations? Not even scab strike games?
The owners and NFL are essentially being subsidized by the TV networks in this strike. Their power to hold out over the NFLPA will be immense. I would think that over this time, the TV networks will lose a ton in advertising revenue and ratings. Why they would sign a deal like that is beyond me. Maybe they are so many programs and so much revenue to go around with other programming they don't notice or care??? Would like to do more research on this.
Why? Because the NFL is a money maker for everyone involved. The owners hold so much power that they can force the networks into that type of deal.
|
|
|
|