Penalties v. Turnovers (gotta see this)

BillyC · 12-07-2003, 10:55 PM

You know what Billy - lets assume your numbers are right for a second. The Saints rank in the middle of the league in penalties according to your numbers, but in the bottom in turnovers. So turnovers hurt more. You\'re still wrong. Any way you slice it Billy you still lose. Hilarious.

Let\'s think about that for a minute. First I never said that penalties are worse than turnovers. It would take a fool to beleive that. But nice try. I guess is not beneath you. Show me where I EVER said that.

I did say that penalties hurt offenses and offenses with fewer peanalties were way more successful. Here\'s the proof:

St. Louis
Seattle
Indianapolis
Kansas City
Green Bay

Is this just pure luck that all the succesful offenses in the league are the least penalyzed? I win. Quit trying.

[Edited on 8/12/2003 by BillyC]

[Edited on 8/12/2003 by JOESAM2002]

12-07-2003, 10:55 PM	#1
BillyC Banned Join Date: Apr 2004 Posts: 842	Penalties v. Turnovers (gotta see this) You know what Billy - lets assume your numbers are right for a second. The Saints rank in the middle of the league in penalties according to your numbers, but in the bottom in turnovers. So turnovers hurt more. You\'re still wrong. Any way you slice it Billy you still lose. Hilarious. Let\'s think about that for a minute. First I never said that penalties are worse than turnovers. It would take a fool to beleive that. But nice try. I guess is not beneath you. Show me where I EVER said that. I did say that penalties hurt offenses and offenses with fewer peanalties were way more successful. Here\'s the proof: St. Louis Seattle Indianapolis Kansas City Green Bay Is this just pure luck that all the succesful offenses in the league are the least penalyzed? I win. Quit trying. [Edited on 8/12/2003 by BillyC] [Edited on 8/12/2003 by JOESAM2002]
BillyC Banned Join Date: Apr 2004 Posts: 842