|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; Thanks for explaining P. I guess if I played FF I'd be more conservative and always go with the law of averages. Vick had a outstanding season last year but the his mean average tells me it will likely not ...
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#11 |
5000 POSTS! +
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 9,126
|
Thanks for explaining P. I guess if I played FF I'd be more conservative and always go with the law of averages. Vick had a outstanding season last year but the his mean average tells me it will likely not happen again. Brees on the otherhand it's almost a given he will achieve certain goals/points. I'd go with the more sure pick at QB and take risk at other positions. I likely would lose as well since the goal is to achieve the highest point total.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: New Haven Ct
Posts: 23,989
|
CON Vick. LOL
|
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Logic Troll
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Southern Louisiana
Posts: 565
|
Originally Posted by pinch
Depends on how scoring is done. In ESPN standard leagues, Vick was the top scoring QB.![]()
Even in your scoring format, coming in 4th with only 12 games played is a gold mine. It isn't as if you get no points at QB on the games he isn't available for. That is why you have a backup. |
![]() |