|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; Originally Posted by Boutte Sorry didn't really notice. There are so many new guys I spent half my time looking at the roster. Plus I had to leave early because my friend wasn't handling the heat too well. Thanks for ...
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Site Donor 2015
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Finland... formerly Southern Virginia
Posts: 4,963
|
Originally Posted by Boutte
That's OK. I'm just so hungry for any news and/or updates on his performance. I guess with![]()
all the other big name moves on the D-Line, it's natural that he doesn't get mentioned in any of the reports.... or it might be that he is not that good at the NFL level. Regardless, I'm silently hoping that he could surprise us all and be a real sleeper-gem, who could potentially take over next season when some of these 1-year guys might leave the team. Those were some great pictures! When I take my camera with me, I never leave home without my 70-300mm f/4.0-5.6 Di Macro. Although I have some more expensive and supposedly better ones too, it seems I still somehow prefer Tamron's versatility over the others. |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Site Donor
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Belle Chasse
Posts: 1,701
|
Originally Posted by FinSaint
The image stabilization is outstanding.
![]()
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Site Donor 2015
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Finland... formerly Southern Virginia
Posts: 4,963
|
Yeah, I mean there is some color saturation compared to for example canon's own lenses, but overall it's
nothing that can't be corrected with a little photoshopping and I do like the overall versatility like I mentioned - I can take good long range pictures while still having the possibility of using the macro to get really nice looking close-ups. It's really great when you're taking nature shots to have that versatility without having to carry more than one lens with you, which can become quite cumbersome. |
![]() |