Bryant McKennie still available

Rugby Saint II · 08-18-2011, 08:05 PM

We have a stable locker room.......let's keep it that way. Just say NO to McKennie.

Crusader · 08-19-2011, 03:49 AM

Originally Posted by Rugby Saint II

We have a stable locker room.......let's keep it that way. Just say NO to McKennie.

You said it! Lets coach up Brown and Strief an Black. No need for lazy malcontents.

VillainAgain · 08-19-2011, 01:02 PM

Hell flushin NO! Hes way to fat N.O grubb would make him heavier! Hes a jerk, and hes not dedicated, the man shows up to camp weighing in at 400 lbs? 408 lbs to be accurate hes to self absorbed. Theres no way he didnt expect the lockout to end he should have been trainging

neugey · 08-24-2011, 11:34 AM

McKinnie signed by Baltimore, pending physical -

Bryant McKinnie, Baltimore Ravens agree to two-year deal - ESPN

From Minnesota to Baltimore: That earthquake you felt yesterday was McKinnie stepping off the plane.

beau13 · 08-24-2011, 01:53 PM

Why not bring Stinch back as a back up if the knee is any better. He knows the scheme.

Please don't shoot me!!

FinSaint · 08-24-2011, 02:05 PM

Originally Posted by beau13

Why not bring Stinch back as a back up if the knee is any better. He knows the scheme.

Please don't shoot me!!

Based on what I've read on this issue, and from both sides... it seems that the decision was not entirely one-sided, but that Stinch himself felt not up to par and, therefore, was OK with the Saints' decision.

Again, this is the understanding that I've come to, but it could naturally be false in some or all aspects of it. If he is not healthy enough to play, why would bringing him up as a backup - while taking up a much needed roster spot - be a good idea?

08-19-2011, 03:49 AM	#2
Crusader Resident Swede Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Märsta, Sweden Posts: 8,031	Originally Posted by Rugby Saint II We have a stable locker room.......let's keep it that way. Just say NO to McKennie. You said it! Lets coach up Brown and Strief an Black. No need for lazy malcontents.

08-19-2011, 01:02 PM	#3
VillainAgain 100th Post Join Date: Mar 2010 Posts: 273	Hell flushin NO! Hes way to fat N.O grubb would make him heavier! Hes a jerk, and hes not dedicated, the man shows up to camp weighing in at 400 lbs? 408 lbs to be accurate hes to self absorbed. Theres no way he didnt expect the lockout to end he should have been trainging
VillainAgain 100th Post Join Date: Mar 2010 Posts: 273

08-24-2011, 02:05 PM	#6
FinSaint Site Donor 2015 Join Date: Aug 2011 Location: Finland... formerly Southern Virginia Posts: 4,963	Originally Posted by beau13 Why not bring Stinch back as a back up if the knee is any better. He knows the scheme. Please don't shoot me!! Based on what I've read on this issue, and from both sides... it seems that the decision was not entirely one-sided, but that Stinch himself felt not up to par and, therefore, was OK with the Saints' decision. Again, this is the understanding that I've come to, but it could naturally be false in some or all aspects of it. If he is not healthy enough to play, why would bringing him up as a backup - while taking up a much needed roster spot - be a good idea?

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

08-18-2011, 08:05 PM	#1
Rugby Saint II Bounty Money $$$ Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: 5800 Airline Dr. Metairie, LA. Posts: 24,119	We have a stable locker room.......let's keep it that way. Just say NO to McKennie.

08-24-2011, 11:34 AM	#4
neugey Hu Dat! Join Date: Dec 2004 Posts: 6,820 Blog Entries: 13	McKinnie signed by Baltimore, pending physical - Bryant McKinnie, Baltimore Ravens agree to two-year deal - ESPN From Minnesota to Baltimore: That earthquake you felt yesterday was McKinnie stepping off the plane.

08-24-2011, 01:53 PM	#5
beau13 Rookie Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: Atlanta Posts: 19	Why not bring Stinch back as a back up if the knee is any better. He knows the scheme. Please don't shoot me!!