|
|||||||
How the Saints running game can be more effective
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; Originally Posted by strato Block That was the first thing that I thought of too Strat. Get the offensive line to block and create some holes. It's that simple....
19Likes |
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
09-29-2011, 03:58 PM
|
#11 |
|
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Shreveport, LA
Posts: 4,417
|
Originally Posted by strato
That was the first thing that I thought of too Strat. Get the offensive line to block and create some holes. It's that simple.
|
|
|
09-29-2011, 04:15 PM
|
#12 |
|
Problem?
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 11,753
|
Originally Posted by iceshack149
While having balance is ideal, I have no issues with it being lopsided one way or the other as long as we're moving the ball and scoring points.
We lose and Brees throws the ball 50 times... why didn't we run the ball more? We lose and Brees throws 30 times, why didn't we throw the ball more? We fumble pounding the football, why didn't get leave it in Brees' hands? We throw an INT, why didn't get run the ball in that instance? Conclusion: Don't lose. The media/fans will be unhappy and criticize your every move. |
|
Everyone is entitled to be stupid, but some abuse the privilege.
All little common sense goes a long way. |
|
|
|
|
09-29-2011, 04:27 PM
|
#13 |
|
1000 Posts +
|
we are averaging 4.4 ypc
you know how we can run the ball more effectively? try running the ball blaming the line? do you guys realize how effective we actually are on the ground? we almost average a first down every 2 runs |
|
|
|
09-29-2011, 04:48 PM
|
#14 |
|
Truth Addict
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Spanish Fort, AL (via NO and B/R)
Posts: 24,723
|
Originally Posted by CantonLegend
Actually 4.2, which is about average (we're 13th in the league)
|
|
|
|
09-29-2011, 05:04 PM
|
#15 |
|
1000 Posts +
|
Originally Posted by Danno
New Orleans Saints Team Leaders | Teams | NFL.com
66 rushes for 288 yards 4.36 ypc which i rounded using my 4th grade math either way it doesnt matter. we can run the ball. we could last year too. you know what the problem is? its that we just dont run |
|
|
|
09-29-2011, 06:59 PM
|
#16 |
|
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Hockley, Tx
Posts: 1,515
|
I say just do what it takes to win. Run,Pass, sack fumble.
|
|
|
|
09-29-2011, 07:03 PM
|
#17 |
|
Donated Plasma
|
Originally Posted by CantonLegend
The problem is situations. We cannot and do not and have not for YEARS been able to impose our will with the running game. You can talk YPC 'til the dry cows come home. Recent history shows we can't run for that 1-3 yards when we need it most. Period. That is it. That is all. Anything else is damn lies and statistics.
|
|
|
|
09-29-2011, 07:14 PM
|
#18 |
|
1000 Posts +
|
Originally Posted by saintfan
statistics are the only facts.
you can dismiss them but thats because you dont want to believe the truth. fact is that ingram takes more short yardage carries and his ypc reflects that. 3.6 ypc is great for a short yardage back that gets most of his carried when the defense knows we are going to run no we dont impose any running games because we dont run the ball enough. we are a pass first...pass second...and maybe run the ball third but probably pass team ignore facts all you want but ur fighting a losing battle and ur going to end up blaming the wrong ppl |
|
"deal with it or you can go play the saints and get trounced by 30 and you won't have to worry about it."-colin cowherd
|
|
|
|
|
09-29-2011, 07:21 PM
|
#19 |
|
Donated Plasma
|
Originally Posted by CantonLegend
Dear God. Whatever man.
|
|
|
|
«
New Orleans Saints suddenly thrust oft-waived lineman Brian de la Puenta into the spotlight
|
Texans Fans
»
Linear Mode
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:47 AM.
