Anyone disappointed with Ingram?

xan · 11-10-2011, 11:40 PM

Given how fragile running backs are in general and even more so on the Saints, adding a top quality back was smart both short and long run. Ivory's return was not guaranteed, PT hasn't made it through a full season ever, and sproles will wear out if we subject his light frame to bruiser back duty.

So far no elite back has been healthy every game this season. One must have realistic criteria or one might be viewed in the same vein as Rick Perry.

Pete · 11-11-2011, 12:01 AM

Originally Posted by strato

Well looka here...lol..where u been?

Everywhere but here bro lol Workin man workin!WHO-DAT?Pete went to sleep

Kickin azz and taking names is what we bout to do!

Danno · 11-11-2011, 08:48 AM

Originally Posted by xan

One must have realistic criteria or one might be viewed in the same vein as Rick Perry.

And one must have a realistic view of reality or one might be viewed in the same vein as Barack Obama.

strato · 11-11-2011, 09:08 AM

Looking at it again...i like Ingram and see a good future for him...with that said..did we do the right thing?..look around the league and the RBs who were drafted low or not drafted at all...and are doing good...

RB in the first is almost non existent nowadays ...kinda wish we would have went with a OLB...but it is what is ..

I hope Mark can have a great career with us..and prove his worth..

He is a Saint now and i will back em no matter what!

UK_WhoDat · 11-12-2011, 02:38 PM

What’s that? Ah, disappointed?
Don’t talk about – disappointed?
You kidding me? disappointed?

Danno · 11-12-2011, 03:00 PM

Originally Posted by strato

Looking at it again...i like Ingram and see a good future for him...with that said..did we do the right thing?..look around the league and the RBs who were drafted low or not drafted at all...and are doing good...

RB in the first is almost non existent nowadays ...kinda wish we would have went with a OLB...but it is what is ..

I hope Mark can have a great career with us..and prove his worth..

He is a Saint now and i will back em no matter what!

Had we stayed put which OLB would you have taken in the 2nd round?

Miller Ayers Carter and Reed were all gone. The next two OLB's selected were Moch and Mouton and neither has even played a down yet.

Maybe Foster? He went in the 3rd round.

jeanpierre · 11-13-2011, 08:37 AM

Originally Posted by Danno

Had we stayed put which OLB would you have taken in the 2nd round?

Miller Ayers Carter and Reed were all gone. The next two OLB's selected were Moch and Mouton and neither has even played a down yet.

Maybe Foster? He went in the 3rd round.

When I mocked the draft as we got closer, I had Foster as the Saints 2nd or early 3rd pick - I liked his attitude, motor, and love for the game. You can't measure it, but you damn well better be paying attention in interviews...

Also, I like KJ Wright out of Mississippi State - they always produce really good pros on the Defensive Side - he's playing and contributing for Seattle already...

UK_WhoDat · 11-13-2011, 11:45 AM

I ain't disappointed ...... yet.

Overall Ingram offers the Saints a very balance RB team. There is no guarantee any player definitely delivers.

11-11-2011, 12:01 AM	#52
Pete • Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: Patterson, LA Posts: 1,753	Originally Posted by strato Well looka here...lol..where u been? Everywhere but here bro lol Workin man workin!WHO-DAT?Pete went to sleep Kickin azz and taking names is what we bout to do!

11-11-2011, 08:48 AM	#53
Danno Truth Addict Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Spanish Fort, AL (via NO and B/R) Posts: 24,723	Originally Posted by xan One must have realistic criteria or one might be viewed in the same vein as Rick Perry. And one must have a realistic view of reality or one might be viewed in the same vein as Barack Obama. AlaskaSaints likes this.

11-12-2011, 03:00 PM	#56
Danno Truth Addict Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Spanish Fort, AL (via NO and B/R) Posts: 24,723	Originally Posted by strato Looking at it again...i like Ingram and see a good future for him...with that said..did we do the right thing?..look around the league and the RBs who were drafted low or not drafted at all...and are doing good... RB in the first is almost non existent nowadays ...kinda wish we would have went with a OLB...but it is what is .. I hope Mark can have a great career with us..and prove his worth.. He is a Saint now and i will back em no matter what! Had we stayed put which OLB would you have taken in the 2nd round? Miller Ayers Carter and Reed were all gone. The next two OLB's selected were Moch and Mouton and neither has even played a down yet. Maybe Foster? He went in the 3rd round.

11-13-2011, 08:37 AM	#57
jeanpierre Site Donor 2018 Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Thibodaux Posts: 43,543 Blog Entries: 39	Originally Posted by Danno Had we stayed put which OLB would you have taken in the 2nd round? Miller Ayers Carter and Reed were all gone. The next two OLB's selected were Moch and Mouton and neither has even played a down yet. Maybe Foster? He went in the 3rd round. When I mocked the draft as we got closer, I had Foster as the Saints 2nd or early 3rd pick - I liked his attitude, motor, and love for the game. You can't measure it, but you damn well better be paying attention in interviews... Also, I like KJ Wright out of Mississippi State - they always produce really good pros on the Defensive Side - he's playing and contributing for Seattle already...
	Last edited by jeanpierre; 11-13-2011 at 08:40 AM..

LinkBacks (?) LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/37957-anyone-disappointed-ingram.html
Posted By	For	Type	Date	Hits
Anyone disappointed with Ingram?	This thread	Refback	11-09-2011 06:05 PM	3

11-10-2011, 11:40 PM	#51
xan Professor Crab and Site Donor 2014 Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Princeton Posts: 3,371 Blog Entries: 34	Given how fragile running backs are in general and even more so on the Saints, adding a top quality back was smart both short and long run. Ivory's return was not guaranteed, PT hasn't made it through a full season ever, and sproles will wear out if we subject his light frame to bruiser back duty. So far no elite back has been healthy every game this season. One must have realistic criteria or one might be viewed in the same vein as Rick Perry.

Latest Blogs
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey

11-11-2011, 09:08 AM	#54
strato Banned Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: "Little Ole Town in Tejas" Posts: 7,586	Looking at it again...i like Ingram and see a good future for him...with that said..did we do the right thing?..look around the league and the RBs who were drafted low or not drafted at all...and are doing good... RB in the first is almost non existent nowadays ...kinda wish we would have went with a OLB...but it is what is .. I hope Mark can have a great career with us..and prove his worth.. He is a Saint now and i will back em no matter what!

11-12-2011, 02:38 PM	#55
UK_WhoDat 1000 Posts + Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Wherever I lay my hat Posts: 3,983	What’s that? Ah, disappointed? Don’t talk about – disappointed? You kidding me? disappointed?

11-13-2011, 11:45 AM	#58
UK_WhoDat 1000 Posts + Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Wherever I lay my hat Posts: 3,983	I ain't disappointed ...... yet. Overall Ingram offers the Saints a very balance RB team. There is no guarantee any player definitely delivers.