Register All Albums FAQ Community Experience
Go Back   New Orleans Saints Forums - blackandgold.com > Main > Saints

Numbers don't lie...

this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; This time of year there’s tons of garbage on the net about strength of schedule. The 49er fans continuously howl about how the Saint’s offensive numbers are only because they didn’t really play anybody. After a little research I think ...

Like Tree78Likes

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-09-2012, 01:59 PM   #1
1000 Posts +
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: SW Ohio
Posts: 4,645
Numbers don't lie...

This time of year there’s tons of garbage on the net about strength of schedule. The 49er fans continuously howl about how the Saint’s offensive numbers are only because they didn’t really play anybody. After a little research I think the following puts things in perspective.

The 49ers great defense has:
-Played one game against a team that finished in the top 10 in NFL rushing yardage. Their record was 0-1. Point differential minus-10.
-Played four games against teams that finished in the top 10 in NFL passing yardage. Their record was 3-1. Point differential plus – 11.
-The 49ers combined record against quality offenses as defined by being in the top ten in passing and/or rushing was 3-2 with a combined point differential of plus-1.

Our Saints have, by comparison:
Played four games against teams that finished in the top 10 in NFL rushing yardage. Our record was 4-0. Point differential plus-77.
Played six games against teams that finished in the top 10 in NFL passing yardage.
Our record was 5-1. Point differential plus – 80.
Combined record against quality offenses 9-1. Combined point differential plus-157.

Only two NFL teams ranked in the top 10 in rushing and passing, the Saints and Eagles.

So, it looks like the teams that couldn’t run against the 49ers couldn’t really run against anyone. I’m not trying to take anything away from the 49ers but maybe their defensive statistics should have asterisks behind them.
dam1953 is offline  
Old 01-09-2012, 02:04 PM   #2
Problem?
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 11,753
That's pretty interesting... welcome to the board.

If you expand it to top 15 instead of 10, how much would any of this change?
dam1953 likes this.
papz is offline  
Old 01-09-2012, 02:09 PM   #3
5000 POSTS! +
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: The Free State of Idaho
Posts: 5,687
I'm not sold on San Francisco. Look they have played well but I haven't seen them do anything spectacular. I know their defense is good and Alex Smith is a great story. I just don't think they can stop the Saints. If they water the field that proves they dont think they can either.
dam1953 likes this.
jnormand is offline  
Old 01-09-2012, 02:17 PM   #4
5000 POSTS! +
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 9,126
Regardless, their defense is good. They won't make a lot of mistakes.
Halo, spkb25, ScottF and 1 others like this.
Beastmode is offline  
Old 01-09-2012, 02:17 PM   #5
Rookie
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 2
How about you compare The RBs the 49ers faced vs the RB's the Saints have faced?
Puck84 is offline  
Old 01-09-2012, 02:28 PM   #6
Truth Addict
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Spanish Fort, AL (via NO and B/R)
Posts: 24,723
Originally Posted by Puck84 View Post
How about you compare The RBs the 49ers faced vs the RB's the Saints have faced?
How about you do your own homework?
Halo, saintfan, UK_WhoDat and 3 others like this.
Danno is offline  
Old 01-09-2012, 02:34 PM   #7
1000 Posts +
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Anchorage, AK
Posts: 2,484
Blog Entries: 2
How about we compare the Saints to the 49ers, head-to-head, this Saturday!!! Because numbers LIE. The Seahawks had no business beating the Saints last January.

But good point, Blue Dog (dam1953) and welcome to the finest board of any kind on the planet.

Alaska
AlaskaSaints is offline  
Old 01-09-2012, 02:49 PM   #8
10000 POST CLUB
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Alexandria, La
Posts: 11,303
Why are we comparing running games? Let's compare passing, since that's what Drew holds records in so many categories...

Romo = 345 yards
Vick = 416 yards -ouch
Stafford = 293 yards
Manning = 311 yards
Roethlisburger = 330 yards
against the 49ers defense

and I know that Drew is better than all of those, with the better O-Line than the previous examples...
dam1953 likes this.

Last edited by |Mitch|; 01-09-2012 at 02:53 PM..
|Mitch| is offline  
Old 01-09-2012, 02:56 PM   #9
1000 Posts +
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Canton, Ohio
Posts: 2,685
Blog Entries: 2
Originally Posted by |Mitch| View Post
Why are we comparing running games? Let's compare passing, since that's what Drew holds records in so many categories...

Romo = 345 yards
Vick = 416 yards -ouch
Stafford = 293 yards
Manning = 311 yards
Roethlisburger = 330 yards
against the 49ers defense

and I know that Drew is better than all of those, with the better O-Line than the previous examples...
They also went 4-1 against those teams

We got beat by the buccaneers w josh freeman and the rams with Aj feeley
CantonLegend is offline  
Old 01-09-2012, 02:57 PM   #10
10000 POST CLUB
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Alexandria, La
Posts: 11,303
okay Canton; I'll ask you a question...

If Drew throws for 416 yards, do you think the Saints lose, be honest?
dam1953 likes this.
|Mitch| is offline  
Closed Thread


Posting Rules

LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/40117-numbers-dont-lie.html
Posted By For Type Date Hits
Numbers don't lie... This thread Refback 01-09-2012 02:36 PM 6


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:49 AM.


Copyright 1997 - 2020 - BlackandGold.com
no new posts