![]() |
Quote:
If that's what you want, get it, but don't expect unreasonable things. |
true.
I just trying to get rid of all my "negative waves" and think positive. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Moss is a human being. He's been through the ringer for the last 3-4 years because of his antics. The last full season anyone saw this guy play, he set & still holds the NFL records. There is not an NFL CB that can cover this guy when he's giving effort. I think this is an oppurtunity for Moss to get redemption for his past. I say go with it if he's cheap. I think he wants to change his appearance in the public eye & show what caliber of an athlete he still is. Besides......do you really think Meachem or Devery are even in the same hemisphere of Moss? If you do, you are kidding yourself. Mr. Loomis, get Brees this weapon.....even if only for one year.
|
Quote:
My gut says the 2012 version of Moss is a shadow of his former self. Just because he was great 3 or 4 years ago doesn't mean he still is now. If he's still what we saw in 2010, then YES, Meachem and Henderson are definitely better options than Randy Moss, no doubt about it. |
Quote:
Also.....I know people will probably break out the pitchforks on this, but he also doesn't drop catchable balls, like Colston. I love Colston, but truth is truth. Look at it this way.......Marques Colston for $8-9 million/yr. or Randy Moss for $1 million/ year. Uhmmm.......I'll take Randy & use the leftover money on defense where we really need it. |
Quote:
You and I frequently agree, but we are polar opposites on this one my friend. |
Quote:
People can hate the guy all they want, but the fact remains......Randy Moss is one of the most prolific WR's of all time. Take that into account, the fact that he is so hungry for a ring, & the fact that he physically "still has it." You may disagree for personal reasons or whatever, but there is no doubt that Moss is a better player than Meachem or Henderson on any given day. P.S. - Randy's worst season is on par with either Devery or Meachem's career averages. ;-) |
Quote:
|
I personally have fondness towards Moss because he was an important part of one of my favorite Vikings' teams ever, and I wouldn't have anything major against him playing for the Saints if the price was right and his production was up to par.
But to make those comparisons to both Henderson and Meachem is not that fair, because they simply haven't played in similar roles during their respective careers. For example, if we take a look at the more recent level of performances (2009 regular season) head-to-head, we find that there isn't a big difference in Moss', Meachem's and Henderson's relative production levels. In 2009, Moss had 137 catches for a total of 1,264 yards (9.2 y/catch) with a catch % of 61%, and with 13 TDs and 2 fumbles. In 2009, Meachem had 64 catches for a total of 722 yards (11.2 y/catch) with a catch % of 70%, and with 9 TDs and 2 fumbles. In 2009, Henderson had 83 catches for a total of 804 yards (9.6 y/catch) with a catch % of 61%, and with 2 TDs and 0 fumbles. Looking at those numbers alone, I'd have to say that Meachem had better relative numbers than Moss, and if he had been targeted as much as Moss was, he would've exceeded Moss' numbers quite easily. If Meachem would've caught 137 catches like Moss did, his total yardage would've been 1,534 yards according to the average yardage per catch ratio he had that season. Furthermore, since Meachem's catch % was 9% higher than Moss', it is fair to deduce that he wouldn't have needed as many throws to get those 137 catches as Moss did. So numbers and stats are relative, and we can't just go by them when we are trying to evaluate which receiver would be the best option for the Saints going forward. Needless to say that since both Henderson and Meachem are already familiar with SP's schemes and they have a chemistry relationship with Brees - they have the upper hand in a head-to-head comparison of potential future value. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Moss isn't a 1st ballot HOF either. Case wide open. |
Quote:
Yes, but he won't go into the HOF with the performances he has left in the tank, and that is for damn sure. Steelers released 3 former pro-bowlers, should the Saints go after all of them based on their past performances? And both Meachem and Henderson have been playing football during the time Moss has played switcheroo with NFL teams and taken a vacation from the game. It's one thing to perform well on a glorified pro-day, but it's something completely different to do that on a Sunday when the chips are down and to keep doing that for the whole 17+ weeks. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Randy Moss made the Pro Bowl 7 times in his 13 years in the league (1998-2000, 2002-03, 2007, 2009), and was named Pro Bowl MVP in 2000. Moss was also an All-Pro selection five times. (1998, 2000, 2002, 2003, 2007) •Most touchdown receptions in a season – 23 (2007) •Most touchdown receptions by a rookie in a season – 17 (1998) •Most seasons with 17 or more touchdown receptions – 3 (1998, 2003, 2007) •Most games in a season with at least 2 touchdown receptions – 8 (2007) •Most yards receiving in a Pro Bowl game – 212 (2000) •Most 1,200+ yard receiving seasons to start a career – 6 (1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003) •Fastest player to reach 5,000 career receiving yards – 59 games •Youngest player in NFL history to record 100 receiving touchdowns – (29 years and 235 days) •Youngest player in NFL history to record 120 receiving touchdowns – (30 years, 313 days) #5 All time receiving yards, #2 all time touchdowns scored, #10 all time receptions, single season receiving yardage record, single season receiving TD's record, rookie TD reception record, most games in a season w/ multiple TD receptions in history. Do you really think Moss is not a 1st ballot Hall of Famer??? |
I'm just erring on the side of caution when it comes to a player who hasn't seen any real football action in over a year.
We all know what Moss has been capable of in his prime and when he has been mentally focused, but there are no guarantees that the 2012 version of him will even be close to that. And whether or not he comes cheap is beside the point, because he'd still take up a roster spot, and he might end up causing a rift within the team which might not be fixable by simply cutting him. |
Quote:
He's an ******* and a lunatic, but 9 people from the 1970s Raiders also happen to be in the HoF. |
There's only 7 wide receivers in the HOF who started their careers after 1970. Only two were first ballot Largent and Rice.
Irvin got rejected once, Tim Brown and Andre Reed also have been rejected. Moss is not first ballot. I don't care what his stats say. WR's aren't respected by voters for the HOF. Fact. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
You make a very compelling argument for signing Moss and I just wanted to point out post #68 or so in this thread where BGWhoDat put into question the "4.39 to 4.42 forty time". That to me signaled the Randy Moss debate had, or will soon be, a media circus. The "facts" are flying and who knows what's true or not. You can see where BGWhoDat quoted sources both stating and then not confirming a Randy Moss signing. But, I think in light of everything that's gone on lately, I say the Saints embrace the 'bad-boy' image and sign him. Embracing that image did wonders for the Detroit Pistons of the '80s and led to multiple championships. Give Moss a second chance to prove himself as long as you can cut him loose should he revert to his old ways. Make the gamble worth the risk by signing him cheap. For better or worse, I'm now officially on board the Randy Moss bandwagon. IDK if it means I love controversy and/or I am an excitement junkie, but I do know there probably won't be a dull moment, good or bad. |
Quote:
I'm not hating on Moss I simply said he isn't first ballot. To say I don't know football - there's no reason to disrespect someone like that because they simply don't agree with your opinion. A lot of his issues the past couple seasons with half assing routes, his character problems and such, will hurt him. Moss is a second ballot WR in my due to the fact of the issues I've stated and there only being two first ballot WR's since 1970. The odds aren't in his favor. In no way did I say his numbers weren't impressive or first ballot worthy, nor did I say he wasn't credible. I'm aware of the QBs he has played with. There's no need to say I'm fooling myself or don't know football. Relax buddy. |
@SloMotion
I'm glad you read that. I was very disappointed to see so many signals crossed. I know NBC Sports later said the he didn't run the 40 either. I'm not sure where SportsNOLA got their information. I know Moss claimed when he made the statement he wanted to play football again that he could run that and recently clocked at it. Maybe that's where. I was displeased to say the least with my Editor making a false claim that the Saints were going to make him an offer. I never make claims in my articles or posts unless I can confirm them with a few legit sources. I never rely on one persons/websites claim. I'm sure you can understand my position when I have to correct people due to them reading something someone who is "higher in position" than me wrote with absolutely no credible source to say such a claim. It would have been different had he have said "should offer" or "could offer" instead of "will." |
Speaking of HoF
There are some great WR that are not in the HoF yet. Andre Reed, Tim Brown and Chris Carter |
Screw his stats ... i don't want this cancer, "me first" player on the Saints
|
Cris Cater isn't in due to politics
|
Quote:
|
Story on Moss's forty time in Metarie:
NFL.com news: Moss 'looked like the old Randy' during workout with Saints |
Quote:
|
Quote:
As far as your report, I'm telling you that WWL, NBC Sports, and numerous media outlets have confirmed he did not run the 40. I even confirmed it myself with the Times-Picayune and Jay Glazer. Moss didn Every single rumor about the 40 being ran is directed to SportsNOLA.com No idea who their source was, but I believe PFT more than that website, considering they actually have more sources being a national media place. Furthermore as I have stated, the time they said he ran is the exact rumored time that was said he ran before the work out. Trust me on this one, I wouldn't downplay him. |
One good reason he won't be in the HOF ANY time soon....The people voting have been doing it for years and how many receivers been inducted in the last 20 years?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
As for Moss's bad play, well....like I mentioned before, who wants to wear themselves out every down with Daunte Culpepper, Aaron Brooks, & Vince Young. I'm not saying it's right. Just saying I understand. Culpepper had a few good years & that's it. Aaron Brooks sucked! We, as Saints fans, all know that. And Vince Young......well, see the Aaron Brooks comment. Now.....I know Moss received alot of bad publicity for "playing when he wanted to", but tell me......did you ever see him take a play off with Warren Moon, Tom Brady, or even Culpepper in his good days??? Brooks & Young are team killers that bring everyone down, because they suck. I can understand Moss's lack of enthusiasm in that regard. The point is......you give this guy Brees as his QB, a chance at a ring, & a chance to change people's opinion of him.........I would be willing to bet the house Randy Moss would give his all. That said, could you imagine what Drew Brees could do with a guy that runs the 9 route like Moss added to the mix? I'll stop there. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I actually did an article by saying why the Saints SHOULD take a chance on Moss especially in the situation they're in. I'm not against him coming at all. Also, he's quit on the Patriots and Brady before, that's why he got the boot if I'm not mistaken. But, hey.. He does his own thing and deserves first ballot. Hopefully he gets it. We'll see in like, what? 7 years maybe? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:40 PM. |
Copyright 1997 - 2020 - BlackandGold.com