|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; Originally Posted by Tobias-Reiper How many more war references can a corporation make about its product, yet want people to believe there's no one actually trying to hurt the other? (so ironic that the new uniforms are the "combat" line ...
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
04-10-2012, 10:52 AM | #11 |
Site Donor
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: in line with my ridiculous CLEAR PLASTIC BAG
Posts: 3,650
Blog Entries: 3
|
Originally Posted by Tobias-Reiper
I know, I know! And what is the brand or icon of the league, that they keep hyping and defending? The shield. As in, gladiators and knights, both of whom routinely fought to the death. The league uses war references and metaphors of violence to shamelessly hype and promote their product, at every turn since its very founding, then suddenly does an enormous about face in 2010, when the lawsuits come around.
|
Latest Blogs | |
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn
Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey
CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey |
04-10-2012, 11:42 AM | #12 |
10000 POST CLUB
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Cypress Tx.
Posts: 19,027
|
Nope.... If you hired a contract killer and put a bounty on Goodells head but there was a whistle on the play, you would still go to jail for conspiracy to knock Goodell out of the game.
|
04-10-2012, 01:04 PM | #13 |
100th Post
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Miami
Posts: 424
|
Sorry to nerd it up, but evidence of mitigation following the act can't be used in favor of or against in a law suit. But it WILL poison the jury pool. By the time it goes to trial, years from now, jurors won't remember that all this cracking down happened AFTER the lawsuit was filed.
|
04-10-2012, 01:09 PM | #14 |
100th Post
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Miami
Posts: 424
|
Sorry to nerd it up, but evidence of mitigation following the act can't be used in favor of or against in a lawsuit. But it WILL poison the jury pool. By the time it goes to trial, years from now, jurors won't remember that all this cracking down happened AFTER the lawsuit was filed.
|
04-10-2012, 01:21 PM | #15 |
Donated Plasma
|
Originally Posted by Tobias-Reiper
On they knew. They know. A borderline retard would know. The reason they go along with it is money.
Their bottom lines are tied directly to kissing the ass of the NFL. The league could make has been hacks out of just about every sports "reporter" claiming that job title. Not all, but damn near all... Clayton is a hack beat reporter without his "insider" info. Yasinskas is flipping burgers. King is reviewing movies for some east coast paper. Those guys have to be VERY careful, and you can better believe Goodell knows it. |
04-10-2012, 01:26 PM | #16 |
500th Post
|
If this case were in a court of law you could certainly argue that "threats of intention" do not match the evidence of outcome.
Key word here is "If". But in a dictatorship the *despot decides the outcome. And if the despot concludes that his minions have not fully cooperated with his inquiry in a matter that may lead to sanctions on his politbureau, then the dictator must punish the subordinate minions in full view of those who might impose sanctions in an attempt to avoid a monetary penalty on his kingdom. *Goodell |
04-10-2012, 01:38 PM | #17 |
Donated Plasma
|
Originally Posted by Saintsfan4ever
This would never make it to court...
|
04-10-2012, 01:45 PM | #18 |
Merces Letifer
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,161
|
Originally Posted by G504
No need to be sorry for nerding it up. That's what I really wanted to say; they can use this action in the future in front of a jury/judge/arbitrator and argue they are all about safety and while they cannot 100% prevent the "rogue factions" from "ntentionally hurting players", they are "swift" in eradicating them from the NFL. Also, it is a show for the benefit of those in Congress who poked at the NFL in 2009, so they don't come back asking what's up.
|
04-10-2012, 02:55 PM | #19 |
Site Donor 2015
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Land Mass between LA and AL
Posts: 4,375
|
|
04-10-2012, 03:12 PM | #20 |
Truth Addict
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Spanish Fort, AL (via NO and B/R)
Posts: 24,723
|
It reminds me of an old Gene Stallings quote...
Don't evaluate someone by what they say they're going to do, evaluate them by what they've actually done. |