Tweet by Sean Pamphilon..

BGWhoDat · 05-02-2012, 11:08 PM

He was talking at Albert Breer and this was said. I found it intriguing a bit..

https://twitter.com/#!/seanpamphilon...29391546462208

Is this interesting to anyone else?

|Mitch| · 05-02-2012, 11:11 PM

Then why did the ass release it to the public?

BGWhoDat · 05-02-2012, 11:13 PM

Originally Posted by |Mitch|

Then why did the ass release it to the public?

Bingo. That's what I found intriguing. So the NFL knew, didn't ask for it, but he thought the should release it due to player safety?

Hmmmmm....

|Mitch| · 05-02-2012, 11:15 PM

had to be some money involved somewhere, sucks that he took advantage of Gleason the way he did though

CharityMike · 05-02-2012, 11:15 PM

I smell something....

SaintsBro · 05-03-2012, 07:18 AM

It's kinda interesting to ME in that exchange, that @Albert Breer asks Pamphilon "Did Gregg Williams know you were recording the speech?" and Pamphilon responds by flat out EVADING THE QUESTION HE WAS ASKED... he talks about the date the NFL knew he had the tape...not whether or not he had Williams' permission to record it. They were talking about implied consent, can you film or record someone without direct permission.

I agree with Mitch though. I think he released that stuff in order to get ESPN's attention about his documentary, that was stalling out and ESPN was dragging their feet on optioning it. It even said so on his own website, ESPN had accepted the concept and had a "first look" option to buy it, but he hadn't heard from ESPN at all in almost a year.

BGWhoDat · 05-03-2012, 08:35 AM

Originally Posted by SaintsBro

It's kinda interesting to ME in that exchange, that @Albert Breer asks Pamphilon "Did Gregg Williams know you were recording the speech?" and Pamphilon responds by flat out EVADING THE QUESTION HE WAS ASKED... he talks about the date the NFL knew he had the tape...not whether or not he had Williams' permission to record it. They were talking about implied consent, can you film or record someone without direct permission.

That he did. The whole conversation seemed off to me.

Beastmode · 05-03-2012, 09:05 AM

Of all the negative stories recently, this one tops my list. Gleason trusted him to tell his story. He used and betrayed the man and failed to get the story told. I now seriously doubt it will ever be told. It's a moving life story that could have inspired and moved a lot of people especially those close to the disease. I hope I'm wrong.

BIGEASY504 · 05-03-2012, 12:44 PM

Originally Posted by Beastmode

Of all the negative stories recently, this one tops my list. Gleason trusted him to tell his story. He used and betrayed the man and failed to get the story told. I now seriously doubt it will ever be told. It's a moving life story that could have inspired and moved a lot of people especially those close to the disease. I hope I'm wrong.

At the expense of Gleason and what he's has had/have to deal with it may not never-ever get told; and isn't it some sort of law for his eavesdropping or tape conversation without said party knowledge? It's people like him - yeah he got paid!!! Hell Gleason should sue him

ScottF · 05-03-2012, 07:43 AM

jackass missed the spotlight so had to tweet something

05-02-2012, 11:08 PM	#1
BGWhoDat Who Dat Writer Join Date: Feb 2012 Location: New Orleans, LA Posts: 241	Tweet by Sean Pamphilon.. He was talking at Albert Breer and this was said. I found it intriguing a bit.. https://twitter.com/#!/seanpamphilon...29391546462208 Is this interesting to anyone else?

05-02-2012, 11:13 PM	#3
BGWhoDat Who Dat Writer Join Date: Feb 2012 Location: New Orleans, LA Posts: 241	Originally Posted by \|Mitch\| Then why did the ass release it to the public? Bingo. That's what I found intriguing. So the NFL knew, didn't ask for it, but he thought the should release it due to player safety? Hmmmmm....

05-02-2012, 11:15 PM	#5
CharityMike Site Donor 2018 Join Date: Oct 2011 Location: Mid City, New Orleans Posts: 3,556	I smell something.... BGWhoDat likes this.

05-03-2012, 08:35 AM	#7
BGWhoDat Who Dat Writer Join Date: Feb 2012 Location: New Orleans, LA Posts: 241	Originally Posted by SaintsBro It's kinda interesting to ME in that exchange, that @Albert Breer asks Pamphilon "Did Gregg Williams know you were recording the speech?" and Pamphilon responds by flat out EVADING THE QUESTION HE WAS ASKED... he talks about the date the NFL knew he had the tape...not whether or not he had Williams' permission to record it. They were talking about implied consent, can you film or record someone without direct permission. That he did. The whole conversation seemed off to me.

05-03-2012, 09:05 AM	#8
Beastmode 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Jul 2010 Posts: 9,126	Of all the negative stories recently, this one tops my list. Gleason trusted him to tell his story. He used and betrayed the man and failed to get the story told. I now seriously doubt it will ever be told. It's a moving life story that could have inspired and moved a lot of people especially those close to the disease. I hope I'm wrong.
Beastmode 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Jul 2010 Posts: 9,126

05-02-2012, 11:11 PM	#2
\|Mitch\| 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Alexandria, La Posts: 11,303	Then why did the ass release it to the public?

05-03-2012, 07:18 AM	#6
SaintsBro Site Donor Join Date: Sep 2010 Location: in line with my ridiculous CLEAR PLASTIC BAG Posts: 3,650 Blog Entries: 3	It's kinda interesting to ME in that exchange, that @Albert Breer asks Pamphilon "Did Gregg Williams know you were recording the speech?" and Pamphilon responds by flat out EVADING THE QUESTION HE WAS ASKED... he talks about the date the NFL knew he had the tape...not whether or not he had Williams' permission to record it. They were talking about implied consent, can you film or record someone without direct permission. I agree with Mitch though. I think he released that stuff in order to get ESPN's attention about his documentary, that was stalling out and ESPN was dragging their feet on optioning it. It even said so on his own website, ESPN had accepted the concept and had a "first look" option to buy it, but he hadn't heard from ESPN at all in almost a year.

05-03-2012, 12:44 PM	#9
BIGEASY504 100th Post Join Date: Oct 2002 Posts: 487	Originally Posted by Beastmode Of all the negative stories recently, this one tops my list. Gleason trusted him to tell his story. He used and betrayed the man and failed to get the story told. I now seriously doubt it will ever be told. It's a moving life story that could have inspired and moved a lot of people especially those close to the disease. I hope I'm wrong. At the expense of Gleason and what he's has had/have to deal with it may not never-ever get told; and isn't it some sort of law for his eavesdropping or tape conversation without said party knowledge? It's people like him - yeah he got paid!!! Hell Gleason should sue him
BIGEASY504 100th Post Join Date: Oct 2002 Posts: 487

05-03-2012, 07:43 AM	#10
ScottF 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Atlanta Posts: 6,324	jackass missed the spotlight so had to tweet something

LinkBacks (?) LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/43661-tweet-sean-pamphilon.html
Posted By	For	Type	Date	Hits
Tweet by Sean Pamphilon..	This thread	Refback	05-02-2012 11:39 PM	14