|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; That's the point some are trying to make Gup. If we pay Drew $50 million (example), we can not afford to keep players like Sproles, Graham and others who will have contracts coming up. We lost Nicks because we couldn't ...
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Pink Nightmare
|
That's the point some are trying to make Gup. If we pay Drew $50 million (example), we can not afford to keep players like Sproles, Graham and others who will have contracts coming up. We lost Nicks because we couldn't afford him and Drew. What if the guy who takes Nicks' spot doesn't protect Drew as good and Drew gets hammered and is out for the season? Is it worth it?
How many teams have a "Real" QB? Brady and Rogers are the two "For real" QB's out there besides Drew. Peyton is still a guess but a good guess that he will be good. Eli is unpredictable. As well as Rothlesburger. Stafford is ok. Othere than that what teams have a "Real" QB? Alex Smith is no Drew Bress, but he beat us. I want Drew to get everything he has earned. I swear I do, but not at the expense of hurting the team in the near future. |
"We are number one. All others are number two, or lower."
-The Sphinx http://blackandgold.com/groups/28-ou...tsman-s-corner |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Site Donor
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: in line with my ridiculous CLEAR PLASTIC BAG
Posts: 3,650
Blog Entries: 3
|
So would you rather keep Nicks and pay top dollar to have him protect Chase Daniels? Quit inventing crisises that don't exist. Nicks was underpaid by the Saints, period, that's why he left, end of story. The new guy is the new guy and has nothing to do with Nicks.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 68
|
Did not read LULZ
![]() Another Brees thread....when he signs then awesome. Until then, I won't give a single damn. |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Truth Addict
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Spanish Fort, AL (via NO and B/R)
Posts: 24,751
|
Originally Posted by SaintGup
Dang!!! Those are some awEsome accomplishments. Theres no excuse for us not to offer to make Drew Brees the highest paid player in the NFL. ![]()
Oh wait...WE ALREADY DID...TWICE!!! We need to cut ownership some slack. |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
100th Post
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Lafayette
Posts: 158
|
Brees is an amazing QB,one of the best of all time but unfortunately this is still a business and it cost money to run a successful business! If Brees were the only employee than sure pay him the big bucks,but he’s not.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Professor Crab and
Site Donor 2014 |
Just to clarify my "morally deserving" reference:
A sole moral claim is one in which no other party has any right to the fruits of work. If one can establish that the value Brees brings to the organization is in no way related to any other person in that organization, and that he would receive that compensation (in a relative sense) no matter when or where he was geographically and societally, then he is morally deserving of the compensation he seeks. My point is that the line had to block, the receivers had to catch, and the running backs had to run, the defense had to play and the kickers had to kick, the coach had to have a plan, the front office had to find talent, we had to buy tickets and the networks had to pay to televise. To claim Brees achieved what he has without at least partially attributing his success to the quality of the team around him would be difficult to justify morally. No one disputes he adds tremendous value, and that his compensation should reflect his contribution. Even Michael Phelps, who wins most of his races by himself, recognizes his entitlements from winning those races do not give him moral claim to the entirety of the fruits of his work. |
Calvin: "I wish I was a Tiger."
Hobbes: "Common lament." |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Hou Saints Fan
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Houston, Tx
Posts: 5,050
|
Originally Posted by SaintGup
If in the spring of 2006, you told me that by the 2012 season, the quarterback of the Saints would accomplish all that .... I would of asked for what kind of bourbon you were drinking cause you'd have to be drunk to say that .... Drew means so much to this team and city that Loomis will pay him what is fair and a deal will get done before training camp, now that the team knows who is suspended I got a good feeling that Drew's deal will get done soon
![]()
|
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Pink Nightmare
|
SaintBro,
I don't see how I am inventing anything. I don't control the Saints anymore than you do. Was Nicks underpaid? Yes. But I guess it is okay to over pay a player at the cost of losing other players. Say what you want. Call me dumb if you like. But I don't want a crap team (because we can't afford to keep or bring in good players) again and then say "But we have Drew Brees!" Do you? |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Site Donor
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: in line with my ridiculous CLEAR PLASTIC BAG
Posts: 3,650
Blog Entries: 3
|
Originally Posted by SapperSaint
No, I don't think you're dumb or anything like that. Please don't think I meant anything like that. I actually like your posts. I just think in the case of comparing the new guy to Nicks, you are "inventing" a crisis that hasn't happened yet. Nobody knows how this new guy is going to work out, he may turn out to be a stellar addition to the team at a fraction of the price of Nicks, which is exactly what we all want. Worrying about it before he's played a single down is counter-productive. That's all I meant. Unlike a lot of people here, I trust the Saints' front office to come up with a deal for Brees that is fair to both parties and keeps the team competitive for the rest of Brees' time here.
![]()
|
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/43696-again-drew-brees.html
|
||||
Posted By | For | Type | Date | Hits |
Again, with Drew Brees... | This thread | Refback | 05-04-2012 08:10 AM | 10 |