|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; Originally Posted by ScottF Yes, but it works both ways---Vilma will need to swear under oath as well. He could actually face criminal charges based on testimony. He must be confident, plus he has hired the NFL-Killer lawyer Ginsberg. Goodell ...
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
05-19-2012, 11:17 PM | #21 |
Rating:
(0 votes - average)
Originally Posted by ScottF
Goodell has stated on ESPN he has 2,000 individual statements that he took in private. That's about 2 a day over the last 3 years, remarkable. But ok, I'll buy it.
What I don't buy is of all these these people, nobody decided to just say screw it and come forward to the public either for monetary or morale reasons regarding bounties to injure players on any team....not a single one? Amazing! If I were Vilma's lawyer I would be feeling fairly confident that Goodell won't be able to get any of them to testify under oath. Vilma has already stated he was not involved. So where does that leave us? Goodell is going to have to pull a rabbit out of a hat. Maybe he can, but for someone who submitted a sham email from a convict as evidence I don't think he's going to pull anything out of that hat except lent. |
|
Views: 5033
|
Latest Blogs | |
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn
Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey
CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey |
05-20-2012, 09:52 AM | #22 |
5000 POSTS! +
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 6,324
|
Great Point, especially when you consider that the majority of those statements have to be from players, or personnel close to the team.
|
05-20-2012, 01:53 PM | #23 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Wherever I lay my hat
Posts: 3,947
|
|
05-20-2012, 06:12 PM | #24 |
10000 POST CLUB
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bossier City, LA
Posts: 26,210
|
|
05-20-2012, 07:39 PM | #25 |
5000 POSTS! +
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 9,126
|
Originally Posted by AsylumGuido
It's actually over two dozen, not 2K, so I apologize, I just misheard it but still, if you watch the video there are other thing that are confusing.
Like the email not "not as big as a factor (2:15)" when that was the main thing pushed on the public. Then "we put together all of our information and released all of our information on March 2nd (3:20)" that is in fact a lie. We are still waiting... http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...uoFirJQyk#t=0s |
05-20-2012, 09:37 PM | #26 |
failclownHunter
|
Originally Posted by Beastmode
Yes., and I think people need to realize that the evidence that Goodell has, villa's lawyers know about.
All of the documents were freely given to the NFL by the Saints HO, they didn't raid the Dome. So, Vilma's lawyers have looked over everything given to the NFL, and see no case. Short of a confession no one knows about, I can't see how Goodell will justify his comments. But, Vilma will have to explain his also. |
Last edited by pherein; 05-20-2012 at 09:40 PM.. |
|
05-21-2012, 04:53 PM | #27 |
5000 POSTS! +
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 6,324
|
Really interested to see RG's play here. Does he spend the time and money (and risk) and go balls to the walls to defend himself? does he cut a deal?
The only thing in his favor (other than supposed evidence) is that Vilma and Ginsburg have to prove intended malice by RG's action. That is subjective at best, but since we all know the punishments are for lying and not hitting, it just might work. It seems like RG is all-in no matter what he does. |
05-21-2012, 05:06 PM | #28 |
Site Donor
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: in line with my ridiculous CLEAR PLASTIC BAG
Posts: 3,650
Blog Entries: 3
|
I don't think there is a deal or settlement Goodell could cut, in a defamation case, that would pull Vilma off the attack now, if Vilma thinks he has genuinely been defamed
|
05-21-2012, 05:15 PM | #29 |
evil decepticon
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: St. Augustine, FL
Posts: 583
|
Agreed, by all accounts Vilma is insanely intelligent, so highly unlikely that this was a heat of the moment decision and be placated. Vilma is a shark out for blood.
|
05-21-2012, 08:52 PM | #30 |
5000 POSTS! +
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 6,324
|
Sure he could- "After re-examining the evidence and looking at new material, I now find that Vilma was not guilty. Suspension over."
|
|
|
LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/43942-why-vilma-v-goodell-much-more-than-just-defamation-lawsuit.html
|
||||
Posted By | For | Type | Date | Hits |
Why Vilma v. Goodell is much more than just a defamation lawsuit | This thread | Refback | 05-18-2012 12:17 AM | 9 |