Will the Saints have a dynasty before Brees retires?

TheOak · 09-02-2012, 03:30 AM

Originally Posted by GoofySaint

A dynasty implies rise and fall.

A team rules for an era, then stops and we move on to the next era.
The only way for a team to "rule" would be to win rings so it just makes sense.
It has nothing to do with the "franchise".

The browns always do bad but there franchise itself still exists. It doesn't fall.

In order for a franchise to CONTINUE RISING. Terry bradshaw and every steeler that played in the 70s would have to STILL BE PLAYING NOW the same way. lol.

We don't call the steelers a dynasty. We call the 70s steelers a dynasty. We can't call the organization a dynasty because no organization is perfect. And even then we still can't call it a dynasty because every dynasty eventually falls so it would to be called something.

You have it backwards.

The Steelers are a dynasty.

The 70's Steelers was an era

e·ra/ˈi(ə)rə/

Noun:

A long and distinct period of history with a particular feature or characteristic.
A system of chronology dating from a particular noteworthy event.

You cant start redefining words to suit what "yall" call something. As far as for some yahoo changing the definition of dynasty so he can have talking points about his team... I am not on board with it. As soon as you slap a time period on it, it becomes an era.

09-02-2012, 03:30 AM	#25
TheOak 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: Cypress Tx. Posts: 19,051	Re: Will the Saints have a dynasty before Brees retires? Originally Posted by GoofySaint A dynasty implies rise and fall. A team rules for an era, then stops and we move on to the next era. The only way for a team to "rule" would be to win rings so it just makes sense. It has nothing to do with the "franchise". The browns always do bad but there franchise itself still exists. It doesn't fall. In order for a franchise to CONTINUE RISING. Terry bradshaw and every steeler that played in the 70s would have to STILL BE PLAYING NOW the same way. lol. We don't call the steelers a dynasty. We call the 70s steelers a dynasty. We can't call the organization a dynasty because no organization is perfect. And even then we still can't call it a dynasty because every dynasty eventually falls so it would to be called something. You have it backwards. The Steelers are a dynasty. The 70's Steelers was an era e·ra/ˈi(ə)rə/ Noun: A long and distinct period of history with a particular feature or characteristic. A system of chronology dating from a particular noteworthy event. You cant start redefining words to suit what "yall" call something. As far as for some yahoo changing the definition of dynasty so he can have talking points about his team... I am not on board with it. As soon as you slap a time period on it, it becomes an era.

LinkBacks (?) LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/49183-will-saints-have-dynasty-before-brees-retires.html
Posted By	For	Type	Date	Hits
Will the Saints have a dynasty before Brees retires?	This thread	Refback	08-30-2012 02:41 PM	2