Go Back   New Orleans Saints Forums - blackandgold.com > Main > Saints

Would Vitt just take over?

this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; If the Saints go 6-0 or 5-1 in the first 6 games.... would Vitt really just come in and take over even at the risk of disrupting the rhythm of the team?...

Like Tree4Likes

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-05-2012, 07:29 AM   #1
1000 Posts +
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,317
Would Vitt just take over?

If the Saints go 6-0 or 5-1 in the first 6 games.... would Vitt really just come in and take over even at the risk of disrupting the rhythm of the team?
hitta is offline  
Old 09-05-2012, 07:47 AM   #2
10000 POST CLUB
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Cypress Tx.
Posts: 19,003
Re: Would Vitt just take over?

"Take Over" is not exactly how I see it. When Vitt returns it will continue the way it has been built. Carmichael running the offense, and Spags running the Defense.

All Kromer is going to do for the first 6 games is decide whether to take the penalty or decline.... And have his hand on the red flag if needed. And make O-Line substitutions.

It has been designed to run smoothly weather it is Vit, Kromer, or the Easter Bunny.
TheOak is offline  
Old 09-05-2012, 07:51 AM   #3
1000 Posts +
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,317
Re: Would Vitt just take over?

Originally Posted by x626xBlack View Post
"Take Over" is not exactly how I see it. When Vitt returns it will continue the way it has been built. Carmichael running the offense, and Spags running the Defense.

All Kromer is going to do for the first 6 games is decide whether to take the penalty or decline.... And have his hand on the red flag if needed. And make O-Line substitutions.

It has been designed to run smoothly weather it is Vit, Kromer, or the Easter Bunny.
Well yea, I agree with that... but someone will still make the big decisions... and having a change may affect the chemistry.
hitta is offline  
Old 09-05-2012, 08:02 AM   #4
10000 POST CLUB
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Cypress Tx.
Posts: 19,003
Re: Would Vitt just take over?

Originally Posted by hitta View Post
Well yea, I agree with that... but someone will still make the big decisions... and having a change may affect the chemistry.
Which big decisions are you speaking of.. I must be missing something.

If Carmichael/Brees are running the office and Spag's is running the defense what is left? L/R/C on kick offs and punts? That would be McMahon


Do you recall the banner from Payton saying "Do your job?"...

Those coaches need to do their job. If they do their job there will be no issues.

The Colts did just fine from 09-11 with no head coach and the QB running the plays.
TheOak is offline  
Old 09-05-2012, 08:51 AM   #5
500th Post
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Hub City
Posts: 576
Re: Would Vitt just take over?

Originally Posted by x626xBlack View Post
The Colts did just fine from 09-11 with no head coach and the QB running the plays.
lol @ no head coach

A lot like Dilfer, just don't do anything dumb and let the machine do its work

Lucky for us we have a pretty darn reliable machine named Drew
TheOak likes this.
Shoe. is offline  
Old 09-05-2012, 09:28 AM   #6
LET MY TEAM GO!
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Just north of COWGAL HELL
Posts: 296
Re: Would Vitt just take over?

I really think the veteran leadership on the team is going to take more of a mentor approach.

They may hit a snag or two, but believe the player leaderrship will drag them through if necessary.
TXGSP is offline  
Old 09-05-2012, 09:36 AM   #7
10000 POST CLUB
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Cypress Tx.
Posts: 19,003
Re: Would Vitt just take over?

And that is my point. If you look at one specific comment from Sean Payton in his interview he stated: "we built a program"..a system.. He also pushed collaboration... Which means every single coach was part of every single decision process... This trained our present coaches on how Sean Payton came to his decisions and they know how he thinks.

The Saints are not one person running everything.
TXGSP likes this.
TheOak is offline  
Old 09-05-2012, 01:04 PM   #8
Site Donor 2015
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Finland... formerly Southern Virginia
Posts: 4,959
Re: Would Vitt just take over?

Regardless of how the Saints are doing at the point at which Vitt's suspension is over - he should take over the interim HC position, if not for any other reason than his press conferences are more entertaining than Kromer's.
FinSaint is offline  
Old 09-05-2012, 02:05 PM   #9
Site Donor 2015
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Land Mass between LA and AL
Posts: 4,375
Re: Would Vitt just take over?

Originally Posted by x626xBlack View Post
And that is my point. If you look at one specific comment from Sean Payton in his interview he stated: "we built a program"..a system.. He also pushed collaboration... Which means every single coach was part of every single decision process... This trained our present coaches on how Sean Payton came to his decisions and they know how he thinks.

The Saints are not one person running everything.
Exactly, well said.
Mardigras9 is offline  
Old 09-05-2012, 03:27 PM   #10
Site Donor
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: in line with my ridiculous CLEAR PLASTIC BAG
Posts: 3,650
Blog Entries: 3
Re: Would Vitt just take over?

Vitt is a lifetime veteran of the NFL coaching world and is football to the bone. He's been coaching since Earl Campbell was the league MVP and almost since the days when a lot of dudes wore single bar facemasks, that's how old school he is.The players respond well to him and he will be welcomed back when the time comes, just as they will welcome Payton back when that time comes.
SaintsBro is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules

LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/49535-would-vitt-just-take-over.html
Posted By For Type Date Hits
Would Vitt just take over? This thread Refback 09-05-2012 08:14 AM 1


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:12 AM.


Copyright 1997 - 2020 - BlackandGold.com
no new posts