Would Vitt just take over?

hitta · 09-05-2012, 08:29 AM

If the Saints go 6-0 or 5-1 in the first 6 games.... would Vitt really just come in and take over even at the risk of disrupting the rhythm of the team?

TheOak · 09-05-2012, 08:47 AM

"Take Over" is not exactly how I see it. When Vitt returns it will continue the way it has been built. Carmichael running the offense, and Spags running the Defense.

All Kromer is going to do for the first 6 games is decide whether to take the penalty or decline.... And have his hand on the red flag if needed. And make O-Line substitutions.

It has been designed to run smoothly weather it is Vit, Kromer, or the Easter Bunny.

hitta · 09-05-2012, 08:51 AM

Originally Posted by x626xBlack

"Take Over" is not exactly how I see it. When Vitt returns it will continue the way it has been built. Carmichael running the offense, and Spags running the Defense.

All Kromer is going to do for the first 6 games is decide whether to take the penalty or decline.... And have his hand on the red flag if needed. And make O-Line substitutions.

It has been designed to run smoothly weather it is Vit, Kromer, or the Easter Bunny.

Well yea, I agree with that... but someone will still make the big decisions... and having a change may affect the chemistry.

TheOak · 09-05-2012, 09:02 AM

Originally Posted by hitta

Well yea, I agree with that... but someone will still make the big decisions... and having a change may affect the chemistry.

Which big decisions are you speaking of.. I must be missing something.

If Carmichael/Brees are running the office and Spag's is running the defense what is left? L/R/C on kick offs and punts? That would be McMahon

Do you recall the banner from Payton saying "Do your job?"...

Those coaches need to do their job. If they do their job there will be no issues.

The Colts did just fine from 09-11 with no head coach and the QB running the plays.

Shoe. · 09-05-2012, 09:51 AM

Originally Posted by x626xBlack

The Colts did just fine from 09-11 with no head coach and the QB running the plays.

lol @ no head coach

A lot like Dilfer, just don't do anything dumb and let the machine do its work

Lucky for us we have a pretty darn reliable machine named Drew

TXGSP · 09-05-2012, 10:28 AM

I really think the veteran leadership on the team is going to take more of a mentor approach.

They may hit a snag or two, but believe the player leaderrship will drag them through if necessary.

TheOak · 09-05-2012, 10:36 AM

And that is my point. If you look at one specific comment from Sean Payton in his interview he stated: "we built a program"..a system.. He also pushed collaboration... Which means every single coach was part of every single decision process... This trained our present coaches on how Sean Payton came to his decisions and they know how he thinks.

The Saints are not one person running everything.

FinSaint · 09-05-2012, 02:04 PM

Regardless of how the Saints are doing at the point at which Vitt's suspension is over - he should take over the interim HC position, if not for any other reason than his press conferences are more entertaining than Kromer's.

Mardigras9 · 09-05-2012, 03:05 PM

Originally Posted by x626xBlack

And that is my point. If you look at one specific comment from Sean Payton in his interview he stated: "we built a program"..a system.. He also pushed collaboration... Which means every single coach was part of every single decision process... This trained our present coaches on how Sean Payton came to his decisions and they know how he thinks.

The Saints are not one person running everything.

Exactly, well said.

SaintsBro · 09-05-2012, 04:27 PM

Vitt is a lifetime veteran of the NFL coaching world and is football to the bone. He's been coaching since Earl Campbell was the league MVP and almost since the days when a lot of dudes wore single bar facemasks, that's how old school he is.The players respond well to him and he will be welcomed back when the time comes, just as they will welcome Payton back when that time comes.

09-05-2012, 08:29 AM	#1
hitta 1000 Posts + Join Date: Oct 2009 Posts: 1,320	Would Vitt just take over? If the Saints go 6-0 or 5-1 in the first 6 games.... would Vitt really just come in and take over even at the risk of disrupting the rhythm of the team?
hitta 1000 Posts + Join Date: Oct 2009 Posts: 1,320

09-05-2012, 08:47 AM	#2
TheOak 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: Cypress Tx. Posts: 19,026	Re: Would Vitt just take over? "Take Over" is not exactly how I see it. When Vitt returns it will continue the way it has been built. Carmichael running the offense, and Spags running the Defense. All Kromer is going to do for the first 6 games is decide whether to take the penalty or decline.... And have his hand on the red flag if needed. And make O-Line substitutions. It has been designed to run smoothly weather it is Vit, Kromer, or the Easter Bunny. RockyMountainSaint and Crusader like this.

09-05-2012, 08:51 AM	#3
hitta 1000 Posts + Join Date: Oct 2009 Posts: 1,320	Re: Would Vitt just take over? Originally Posted by x626xBlack "Take Over" is not exactly how I see it. When Vitt returns it will continue the way it has been built. Carmichael running the offense, and Spags running the Defense. All Kromer is going to do for the first 6 games is decide whether to take the penalty or decline.... And have his hand on the red flag if needed. And make O-Line substitutions. It has been designed to run smoothly weather it is Vit, Kromer, or the Easter Bunny. Well yea, I agree with that... but someone will still make the big decisions... and having a change may affect the chemistry.
hitta 1000 Posts + Join Date: Oct 2009 Posts: 1,320

09-05-2012, 09:02 AM	#4
TheOak 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: Cypress Tx. Posts: 19,026	Re: Would Vitt just take over? Originally Posted by hitta Well yea, I agree with that... but someone will still make the big decisions... and having a change may affect the chemistry. Which big decisions are you speaking of.. I must be missing something. If Carmichael/Brees are running the office and Spag's is running the defense what is left? L/R/C on kick offs and punts? That would be McMahon Do you recall the banner from Payton saying "Do your job?"... Those coaches need to do their job. If they do their job there will be no issues. The Colts did just fine from 09-11 with no head coach and the QB running the plays.

09-05-2012, 09:51 AM	#5
Shoe. 500th Post Join Date: Nov 2011 Location: Hub City Posts: 576	Re: Would Vitt just take over? Originally Posted by x626xBlack The Colts did just fine from 09-11 with no head coach and the QB running the plays. lol @ no head coach A lot like Dilfer, just don't do anything dumb and let the machine do its work Lucky for us we have a pretty darn reliable machine named Drew TheOak likes this.

Latest Blogs
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey

09-05-2012, 10:28 AM	#6
TXGSP LET MY TEAM GO! Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Just north of COWGAL HELL Posts: 296	Re: Would Vitt just take over? I really think the veteran leadership on the team is going to take more of a mentor approach. They may hit a snag or two, but believe the player leaderrship will drag them through if necessary.

09-05-2012, 10:36 AM	#7
TheOak 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: Cypress Tx. Posts: 19,026	Re: Would Vitt just take over? And that is my point. If you look at one specific comment from Sean Payton in his interview he stated: "we built a program"..a system.. He also pushed collaboration... Which means every single coach was part of every single decision process... This trained our present coaches on how Sean Payton came to his decisions and they know how he thinks. The Saints are not one person running everything. TXGSP likes this.

09-05-2012, 02:04 PM	#8
FinSaint Site Donor 2015 Join Date: Aug 2011 Location: Finland... formerly Southern Virginia Posts: 4,961	Re: Would Vitt just take over? Regardless of how the Saints are doing at the point at which Vitt's suspension is over - he should take over the interim HC position, if not for any other reason than his press conferences are more entertaining than Kromer's.

09-05-2012, 03:05 PM	#9
Mardigras9 Site Donor 2015 Join Date: Dec 2010 Location: Land Mass between LA and AL Posts: 4,375	Re: Would Vitt just take over? Originally Posted by x626xBlack And that is my point. If you look at one specific comment from Sean Payton in his interview he stated: "we built a program"..a system.. He also pushed collaboration... Which means every single coach was part of every single decision process... This trained our present coaches on how Sean Payton came to his decisions and they know how he thinks. The Saints are not one person running everything. Exactly, well said.

09-05-2012, 04:27 PM	#10
SaintsBro Site Donor Join Date: Sep 2010 Location: in line with my ridiculous CLEAR PLASTIC BAG Posts: 3,650 Blog Entries: 3	Re: Would Vitt just take over? Vitt is a lifetime veteran of the NFL coaching world and is football to the bone. He's been coaching since Earl Campbell was the league MVP and almost since the days when a lot of dudes wore single bar facemasks, that's how old school he is.The players respond well to him and he will be welcomed back when the time comes, just as they will welcome Payton back when that time comes.

LinkBacks (?) LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/49535-would-vitt-just-take-over.html
Posted By	For	Type	Date	Hits
Would Vitt just take over?	This thread	Refback	09-05-2012 09:14 AM	1