New Orleans Saints running back rotation appearing to stand pat meaning no playing time for Chris Ivory

AlaskaSaints · 09-29-2012, 11:50 PM

Originally Posted by Ashley

I'd rather trade ingram, that's just me. He might be good, but we could get something for him, Ivory would not get us anything on a trade

Did you just back-hand SLAP ME?! LOL

Alaska

ChrisXVI · 09-28-2012, 07:48 PM

I predict we'll trade Ingram in a year or two and just like Reggie; he'll go excel in a different offense. Ingram just doesn't fit our offense... Let's face it, it was a bad draft pick. Mark is a bell cow back who needs carries to get into a groove. No disrespect to Payton and Loomis, we absolutely needed a RB in that year's draft, but why would you trade up to get a bell cow back when you don't have a "ground and pound" offense?! Ingram will continue to put up mediocre numbers until we trade him and then he'll go be successful elsewhere.

westbankdaze · 09-28-2012, 11:34 PM

I think if we go to 0-4 then we will see more cadet. It's a perfect opportunity to get guys we have on the bench into more real action without really having to worry about our W-L record.

halloween 65 · 09-29-2012, 04:35 PM

For a 1st round draft pick vs. a undrafted free agent and comparing their performances, it's black and white to me Ivory is better, now I wonder what it would look like with both of them in the backfield togather for some smash football and let PT and Sproles play after the D is wore down?

09-29-2012, 11:50 PM	#1
AlaskaSaints 1000 Posts + Join Date: Nov 2010 Location: Anchorage, AK Posts: 2,484 Blog Entries: 2	Re: New Orleans Saints running back rotation appearing to stand pat meaning no playing time for Chris Ivory Originally Posted by Ashley I'd rather trade ingram, that's just me. He might be good, but we could get something for him, Ivory would not get us anything on a trade Did you just back-hand SLAP ME?! LOL Alaska

09-28-2012, 07:48 PM	#2
ChrisXVI 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Aug 2011 Location: Madison, WI Posts: 11,482	Re: New Orleans Saints running back rotation appearing to stand pat meaning no playing time for Chris Ivory I predict we'll trade Ingram in a year or two and just like Reggie; he'll go excel in a different offense. Ingram just doesn't fit our offense... Let's face it, it was a bad draft pick. Mark is a bell cow back who needs carries to get into a groove. No disrespect to Payton and Loomis, we absolutely needed a RB in that year's draft, but why would you trade up to get a bell cow back when you don't have a "ground and pound" offense?! Ingram will continue to put up mediocre numbers until we trade him and then he'll go be successful elsewhere.

09-28-2012, 11:34 PM	#3
westbankdaze 500th Post Join Date: Jul 2011 Posts: 843	I think if we go to 0-4 then we will see more cadet. It's a perfect opportunity to get guys we have on the bench into more real action without really having to worry about our W-L record.
westbankdaze 500th Post Join Date: Jul 2011 Posts: 843

09-29-2012, 04:35 PM	#4
halloween 65 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Sep 2011 Location: Grand Haven, Michigan by way of a little Mississippi River town in Louisiana Posts: 5,893	Re: New Orleans Saints running back rotation appearing to stand pat meaning no playing time for Chris Ivory For a 1st round draft pick vs. a undrafted free agent and comparing their performances, it's black and white to me Ivory is better, now I wonder what it would look like with both of them in the backfield togather for some smash football and let PT and Sproles play after the D is wore down?

LinkBacks (?) LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/51094-new-orleans-saints-running-back-rotation-appearing-stand-pat-meaning-no-playing.html
Posted By	For	Type	Date	Hits
New Orleans Saints running back rotation appearing to stand pat meaning no playing time for Chris Ivory	This thread	Refback	09-28-2012 06:43 AM	5