|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; The 3-4 is now interesting. Before it probably wasn't wise since our two best players along the front are Will Smith and Jonathan Vilma. Both of those players are not suited for a 3-4 at all. But now that Smith ...
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
10-02-2012, 08:17 AM | #21 |
Truth Addict
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Spanish Fort, AL (via NO and B/R)
Posts: 24,720
|
Re: OLB's - A sad day
The 3-4 is now interesting. Before it probably wasn't wise since our two best players along the front are Will Smith and Jonathan Vilma. Both of those players are not suited for a 3-4 at all.
But now that Smith is merely average and Vilma is on the decline, it makes more sense now. Martez would make a good OLB in a 3-4. Jordan is definitley 3-4 end material Bunkley can play nose We have the ingredients now to possibly make the switch next year if we decide to. Spags is a 4-3 coach and we may want to give him some more time. He's proven his system works, and its a known fact that his schemes take a while for players to learn. Either way, we need 3 or 4 new and better players along the front seven to achieve succes in either scheme. |
Latest Blogs | |
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn
Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey
CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey |
10-02-2012, 08:29 AM | #22 |
Site Donor 2018
|
Re: OLB's - A sad day
Originally Posted by x626xBlack
There's been healthy debate for a 3-4 here; it just was when you called the question the 3-4 advocators were probably at the buffet with Sedrick and Will...
But make no mistake, I'm not a Shanle apologist, I just don't get all the heat on him when often times the breakdown in coverage has as much to do with the Safeties (ie Harper, Jenkins, mostly Harper)... And I don't advocate Shanle as a down lineman either - in fact, the idea of five down linemen (which would only be for this season until this thing could be blown up and revisited) I have a front line of: RDE Smith/Galette, RT Bunkley, NT Hicks, LT Ellis, LDE Wilson/McBride with Johnson rotating in if not starting and have Ellis rotate at the tackle positions...this would be a stop gap for this season only... I really believe we're wasting some good youth with Wilson on the bench and the salaries we're paying for the non production by Ellis and Smith... |
It's not that my way is the right way, I just make the right way my way...
|
|
10-02-2012, 08:30 AM | #23 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,041
|
Re: OLB's - A sad day
I have wanted Shanle gone for years.I still picture the Vernon Davis catch with him getting beat in my dreams.I thought the addition of our linebackers this season surely meant he was gone.Guess i was wrong
|
10-02-2012, 09:14 AM | #24 |
10000 POST CLUB
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Cypress Tx.
Posts: 19,026
|
Re: OLB's - A sad day
My 3-4 idea was a week ago LOL.... Nothing to do with Vilma.
The problem with 5 d-linemen is that is designed to get someone on the QB... We just do not have the talent to get to the QB. If we did we would have seen it through the rotations... What I see going on is that since we do not have the "one guy" that get to the QB, everyone tries and over penetrates, this giving a RB with one good cut open range from the line of scrimmage on. I truly believe the breakdown in coverage from our safeties is because they know they have to cover Shanle also. If Shanle could do his job for more than 1 play a game our safeties wouldn't be trying to do the job of two people. |
It's not what you look at that matters, it's what you see. ~ Henry David Thoreau
|
|
10-02-2012, 09:35 AM | #25 |
Truth Addict
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Spanish Fort, AL (via NO and B/R)
Posts: 24,720
|
Re: OLB's - A sad day
Originally Posted by x626xBlack
What breakdown in coverages are you referring to? I've not seen many at all. We run a lot of zone which requires the safeties to stay back. The short and middle become the responsibilities of the LB's. Opposing QB's are abusing the hell out of our LB's, not our safeties.
Can you provide examples of all of these breakdowns in coverage by the safeties? I see mostly short passes completed with LB's covering a yard or two behind the receiver, or quick slants inside the CB and outside of the LB. The safeties have nothing to do with that at all. |
10-02-2012, 09:38 AM | #26 |
10000 POST CLUB
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Cypress Tx.
Posts: 19,026
|
Re: OLB's - A sad day
Read two posts above mine.. The comment originated from jeanpierre
|
10-02-2012, 09:39 AM | #27 |
Truth Addict
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Spanish Fort, AL (via NO and B/R)
Posts: 24,720
|
Re: OLB's - A sad day
|
10-02-2012, 12:23 PM | #29 |
Site Donor 2015
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Finland... formerly Southern Virginia
Posts: 4,961
|
Re: OLB's - A sad day
It's interesting that they had a front 4 of Wilson-Smith-Jordan-Galette for a few plays, who arguably are the best pass rushers the Saints have at the moment, but they weren't able to create any more pass rush than the normal front 4 with natural tackles on the interior of the line.
I still personally like the base 4-3 more than the 3-4, so I'm biased toward keeping that, but if the coaches decide a change to 3-4 would be beneficial to their future success - I'd be OK with the switch. |
"I'm not bashing people, I'm bashing their opinions because in my opinion their opinion is wrong" - Danno
|
|
10-02-2012, 12:28 PM | #30 |
10000 POST CLUB
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Cypress Tx.
Posts: 19,026
|
Re: OLB's - A sad day
Originally Posted by FinSaint
Curious, what are your reasons for preferring the 4-3?
|
|
|
LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/51280-olbs-sad-day.html
|
||||
Posted By | For | Type | Date | Hits |
OLB's - A sad day | This thread | Refback | 10-01-2012 09:54 AM | 5 |