5 and 5

TheOak · 11-20-2012, 10:49 AM

Not sure what everyone is smoking but our losses at the start of the season were from abysmal defensive play and receivers not catching balls, and missed field goals.

WE lost those games. No refs took them from us.

We lost to GB by 1 point and the Chiefs by 3.. Hartley missed FGs in both of those games. He is 66% on turf and that is terrible for a dome team.

None of his misses were long by a long shot.

UK_WhoDat · 11-20-2012, 12:01 PM

Originally Posted by arsaint

....Schedules of those ahead of us:

Bears (7-3, 4-1 NFC) : MIN, SEA, @MIN, GB, @ARZ, @DET

Packers (7-3, 5-2 NFC) : @NYG, MIN, DET, @CHI, TEN, @MIN

......
Vikings (6-4, 4-3 NFC) : @CHI, @GB, CHI, @STL, @HOU, GB
....

All fair arsaints. But it all means nada if the Saints do not run their schedule 1st. The Saints schedule is no easier.

One thing to note is the number of games between our "protangonists" of NFC North. Curently they combined have 10 losses league-wide. Which every way you cut it, they combined will have a MINIMUM of 15 losses. I reckon, in all likelihood that 2 of those teams will have 6+ losses.

Jamessr · 11-20-2012, 12:14 PM

Hartley missed a field goal vs Green Bay... I'm guessing the other 52 people and 59:00 minutes had nothing to do with that loss?

he contributed... not the sole factor.
I'm not even hartley fan I can even see that

11-20-2012, 10:49 AM	#51
TheOak 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: Cypress Tx. Posts: 17,831	Re: 5 and 5 Not sure what everyone is smoking but our losses at the start of the season were from abysmal defensive play and receivers not catching balls, and missed field goals. WE lost those games. No refs took them from us. We lost to GB by 1 point and the Chiefs by 3.. Hartley missed FGs in both of those games. He is 66% on turf and that is terrible for a dome team. None of his misses were long by a long shot.
	Last edited by TheOak; 11-20-2012 at 10:54 AM..

11-20-2012, 12:01 PM	#52
UK_WhoDat 1000 Posts + Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Wherever I lay my hat Posts: 3,646	Re: 5 and 5 Originally Posted by arsaint ....Schedules of those ahead of us: Bears (7-3, 4-1 NFC) : MIN, SEA, @MIN, GB, @ARZ, @DET Packers (7-3, 5-2 NFC) : @NYG, MIN, DET, @CHI, TEN, @MIN ...... Vikings (6-4, 4-3 NFC) : @CHI, @GB, CHI, @STL, @HOU, GB .... All fair arsaints. But it all means nada if the Saints do not run their schedule 1st. The Saints schedule is no easier. One thing to note is the number of games between our "protangonists" of NFC North. Curently they combined have 10 losses league-wide. Which every way you cut it, they combined will have a MINIMUM of 15 losses. I reckon, in all likelihood that 2 of those teams will have 6+ losses.

11-20-2012, 12:14 PM	#53
Jamessr 1000 Posts + Join Date: Oct 2010 Location: Newport News, VA Posts: 1,583	Re: 5 and 5 Hartley missed a field goal vs Green Bay... I'm guessing the other 52 people and 59:00 minutes had nothing to do with that loss? he contributed... not the sole factor. I'm not even hartley fan I can even see that D_it_up likes this.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

LinkBacks (?) LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/52994-5-5-a.html
Posted By	For	Type	Date	Hits
The Latest New Orleans Saints News \| SportSpyder	This thread	Refback	11-18-2012 08:01 PM	3
5 and 5	This thread	Refback	11-18-2012 06:51 PM	1

Latest Blogs
It’s hard for me to separate the two Last Blog: 02-24-2020 By: neugey Fanspeak On The Clock (Premium) Draft Simulator, jeanpierre's second run Last Blog: 02-11-2020 By: jeanpierre Fanspeak On The Clock (Premium) Draft Simulator, jeanpierre's first run Last Blog: 01-14-2020 By: jeanpierre