Offense = conservative and lackluster

halloween 65 · 12-24-2012, 06:08 AM

Originally Posted by xan

The Patrick's don't suck, as that would imply some sort of positive, though unwanted, action. They re bloody turds that don't float.

Do we even have a secondary coach or does our defensive backfield practice covering at a séance?

You kind of bring up a point, our LB, secondary, and front 4 have not been real good for some time now, I truely believe there is a common in that and to me its not the DC, it's Joe Vitt, now as respected as he is in the league, I feel that overall he has not evolved, facts are since he has been at his position our front 4 stink it up and our lb.'s play is very suspect to say the least, with the exception of Lofton for years. Spags is a really good DC and I would love to see our D play well, I just don't see it with Vitt being there, maybe its time for a change?

12-24-2012, 06:08 AM	#13
halloween 65 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Sep 2011 Location: Grand Haven, Michigan by way of a little Mississippi River town in Louisiana Posts: 5,893	Re: Offense = conservative and lackluster Originally Posted by xan The Patrick's don't suck, as that would imply some sort of positive, though unwanted, action. They re bloody turds that don't float. Do we even have a secondary coach or does our defensive backfield practice covering at a séance? You kind of bring up a point, our LB, secondary, and front 4 have not been real good for some time now, I truely believe there is a common in that and to me its not the DC, it's Joe Vitt, now as respected as he is in the league, I feel that overall he has not evolved, facts are since he has been at his position our front 4 stink it up and our lb.'s play is very suspect to say the least, with the exception of Lofton for years. Spags is a really good DC and I would love to see our D play well, I just don't see it with Vitt being there, maybe its time for a change?