SycoSurfer

It feels good to finally have ppl read the post instead of read who wrote it and then reply... thanks

I think that the Vikings and the Saints are very similar teams. We both have high powered Offenses and very bad Defenses. Take a look at the Vikings schedule. They have lost 7 games by a TD or less. There QB is having a bad year but look what he can do when he has a good game. We won 5 games by less than a TD. You switch that up and they could be going to the playoffs not us. They are a very underrated team.

You give Culpepper another target and he doesnt have to force the ball to Moss and they get some D help and they will be contenders just like us next year. Culpepper just looks a little more advanced in his learning process than Brooks. Brooks has better numbers but he also had a better line, better RB, and more targets.

Im not trying to call out anyone or say anything bad about Brooks but Culpepper and him came out the same year are the same type of QB on similar teams and if I had to pick right now I would go with Culpepper. He just is a little more along than Brooks is RIGHT NOW. It is not experience either Culpepper has 42 games Brooks 38. So they are pretty much identical.

I just get aggrivated when ppl defend Brooks to every critcism and alot of it he deserves. He needs to be more serious and maybe work a lil harder. I do have to hand it to him for playing hurt the last week and this week even thought I thought it was stupid for him to be in there. I just dont like to take unnecessary chances when the playoffs are so close and the game wasnt that important.