Wouldn't Welker be fun?

AllSaints · 02-18-2013, 06:38 PM

NAH ON WELKER... Danny Amendola is a DOG THO !!! He is a beast !

alleycat_126 · 02-18-2013, 06:40 PM

You can tell our season sucked, my brother called me two days ago talking about watching the combine!!! We're more than ready!

hagan714 · 02-18-2013, 06:53 PM

Welker moore colston as the starting 3 wr? sick totally sick. go into 4 wr set with graham, pt and sproils on the field at the same time?

oh baby i would love to hear the DC trying to stop that setup. lmao and loving it

ok pipe dream over. money aint there

Crusader · 02-19-2013, 04:28 AM

No, not really.

lee909 · 02-19-2013, 04:33 AM

I'd rather spend the money on a good LT/CB/OLB

jeanpierre · 02-19-2013, 07:40 AM

Isn't Sproles our scat back guy taking small screens, dumps, and wheels and moving within the defense to pick up yards?!?

I much prefer how we do it and spread the money amongst several players...

Jamessr · 02-19-2013, 07:58 AM

Originally Posted by Seer1

There's no $$$ at all for this and if there was I'd still rather it be spent on the D, but wouldn't Welker in the slot and Sproles running out the other side be fun to watch? That's not even mentioning everyone else we have. Teams'd need twelve men on the field just to try to cover everything.

I hear ya...
I'd even replace our running backs with AP.
Why stop there.. I'd like to get peyton Manning for a year... and replace JG with gronk... and replace ....

Why?
Offense is good enough!

WillSaints81 · 02-20-2013, 05:21 PM

Not to be negative but after this past season a lot of teams will be focusing on Moore next season when they see the tapes in offseason. Which does concern me a little as how does Moore play under an even bigger spotlight than he may have already was. I mean its hard for defenses to cover all three targets of Brees' biggest receivers, but Moore had the best year this season. And Graham's 2011 will not be forgotten. i think Colston is the one thats going to need to step up as well as Morgan and Sproles. I worry though Colston is due to get hurt. He hasnt missed games since the playoff game in 2010.

Rugby Saint II · 02-22-2013, 08:13 PM

Yes he would be fun to hang out with. We don't have a roster spot for him though!

02-18-2013, 06:38 PM	#11
AllSaints Breakin Records Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Deville, Louisiana Posts: 2,167	Re: Wouldn't Welker be fun? NAH ON WELKER... Danny Amendola is a DOG THO !!! He is a beast !

02-18-2013, 06:40 PM	#12
alleycat_126 1000 Posts + Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Katy, Tx a suburb of Houston Posts: 2,089	Re: Wouldn't Welker be fun? You can tell our season sucked, my brother called me two days ago talking about watching the combine!!! We're more than ready!

02-18-2013, 06:53 PM	#13
hagan714 LB Mentallity Join Date: Dec 2005 Posts: 15,870 Blog Entries: 68	Re: Wouldn't Welker be fun? Welker moore colston as the starting 3 wr? sick totally sick. go into 4 wr set with graham, pt and sproils on the field at the same time? oh baby i would love to hear the DC trying to stop that setup. lmao and loving it ok pipe dream over. money aint there

02-19-2013, 04:28 AM	#14
Crusader Resident Swede Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Märsta, Sweden Posts: 8,017	Re: Wouldn't Welker be fun? No, not really.

02-19-2013, 04:33 AM	#15
lee909 Site Donor 2015 Join Date: Mar 2012 Location: Watford England Posts: 8,793 Blog Entries: 1	I'd rather spend the money on a good LT/CB/OLB saintfan and Crusader like this.

Latest Blogs
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey

02-19-2013, 07:40 AM	#16
jeanpierre Site Donor 2018 Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Thibodaux Posts: 43,543 Blog Entries: 39	Re: Wouldn't Welker be fun? Isn't Sproles our scat back guy taking small screens, dumps, and wheels and moving within the defense to pick up yards?!? I much prefer how we do it and spread the money amongst several players...

02-19-2013, 07:58 AM	#17
Jamessr 1000 Posts + Join Date: Oct 2010 Location: Newport News, VA Posts: 1,583	Re: Wouldn't Welker be fun? Originally Posted by Seer1 There's no $$$ at all for this and if there was I'd still rather it be spent on the D, but wouldn't Welker in the slot and Sproles running out the other side be fun to watch? That's not even mentioning everyone else we have. Teams'd need twelve men on the field just to try to cover everything. I hear ya... I'd even replace our running backs with AP. Why stop there.. I'd like to get peyton Manning for a year... and replace JG with gronk... and replace .... Why? Offense is good enough!

02-20-2013, 05:21 PM	#18
WillSaints81 1000 Posts + Join Date: Oct 2012 Posts: 4,267	Re: Wouldn't Welker be fun? Not to be negative but after this past season a lot of teams will be focusing on Moore next season when they see the tapes in offseason. Which does concern me a little as how does Moore play under an even bigger spotlight than he may have already was. I mean its hard for defenses to cover all three targets of Brees' biggest receivers, but Moore had the best year this season. And Graham's 2011 will not be forgotten. i think Colston is the one thats going to need to step up as well as Morgan and Sproles. I worry though Colston is due to get hurt. He hasnt missed games since the playoff game in 2010.

02-22-2013, 08:13 PM	#19
Rugby Saint II Bounty Money $$$ Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: 5800 Airline Dr. Metairie, LA. Posts: 24,043	Re: Wouldn't Welker be fun? Yes he would be fun to hang out with. We don't have a roster spot for him though!

LinkBacks (?) LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/55590-wouldnt-welker-fun.html
Posted By	For	Type	Date	Hits
The Latest New Orleans Saints News \| SportSpyder	This thread	Refback	02-18-2013 05:06 PM	2
Wouldn't Welker be fun?	This thread	Refback	02-18-2013 03:08 PM	38