![]() |
Re: As a Brees contract defender, this doesn't help
Quote:
|
Re: As a Brees contract defender, this doesn't help
Drew has never won a League MVP and has only one Lombardi; had a problem with his contract demands and his agent formerly known as Galactus, the destroyer of salary caps and competitive teams...
|
Re: As a Brees contract defender, this doesn't help
Quote:
|
Re: As a Brees contract defender, this doesn't help
Quote:
1 with him 0 without 1 little caveat- that was what... 40 years without him and 6 with. I don't know, but I like the way the 1 in 6 years sounds. And you're attempting to use that to justify why we shouldn't have paid the man, correct? |
Re: As a Brees contract defender, this doesn't help
Quote:
|
Re: As a Brees contract defender, this doesn't help
Quote:
Prepare to defend against him.... With our defense .:brood: |
Re: As a Brees contract defender, this doesn't help
Not that this wasn't in another thread, but...
You cannot say that another team would have paid what we did because there wasn't a competitive bidding process. It is unclear, and intellectually dishonest, to say that his current salary is what the "market would bear." The Saints were in a competitive bidding situation in which their only competitor was themselves. Don't kid yourself that there were dozens of teams lining up to snatch him away for a franchise crushing $20 million a year. And, further, his original contract ($60 over 6) was a top 10 contract coming off a career threatening injury - so the specious argument that he was underpaid is not worthy of those bringing it up as a defense. The data on skewed salary distributions does not support the argument that teams win when so much cap is concentrated on a few players. And don't cherry pick history when you argue, or you'll likely to be peer reviewed as a fraud. |
Re: As a Brees contract defender, this doesn't help
Comparing the new Brady contract to Brees' contract is like comparing apples to oranges. Brees has completely fulfilled his prior contract and was able to negfociate a new one. It was going to be the last major deal of his career. Brady, on the other hand, was approaching the end of his own personal major deal. He is older and could not expect another long term deal after the end of this one. Therefore, he agreed to an extension of his current deal which guaranteed additional income for two additional years with much of what he was owed in the final year of his current deal being pushed back into the last two years.
The same kind of "extension" can be worked out with Brees in 2015 when the first major cap hit is to take place. He will then be able to guarantee more of that back-end money that is not currently guaranteed and spread the cap hit out over an additional two years. |
Re: As a Brees contract defender, this doesn't help
Updating previous items, Tom Brady's new five-year contract is worth $57 million with $33 million fully guaranteed.
Brady will receive $30 million in signing bonus payments over the first three seasons. His base salaries in 2013 and 2014 are now $1 million and $2 million, respectively. The contract is essentially fully guaranteed through 2015, as in 2016 the money Brady is owed becomes guaranteed for injury only. It's possible that the Patriots could approach Brady about another restructure after that point. For now, they have the future Hall of Famer under control through 2017 at an incredibly team- and cap-friendly rate. Source: ESPN Boston |
Re: As a Brees contract defender, this doesn't help
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:12 AM. |
Copyright 1997 - 2020 - BlackandGold.com