|
|||||||
Tuck rule no, Helmet rule yes
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; Originally Posted by AllSaints I dont think it is as bad as yall are making it out to be.... geezzz You may be right, but based on what I've seen them do with the "defensless receiver" and the new catch ...
10Likes|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
03-20-2013, 03:05 PM
|
#23 |
|
Truth Addict
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Spanish Fort, AL (via NO and B/R)
Posts: 24,756
|
Re: Tuck rule no, Helmet rule yes
Originally Posted by AllSaints
You may be right, but based on what I've seen them do with the "defensless receiver" and the new catch rules concerning a "football move", and the "fumble/no fumble ball moving as it hits the ground but still in his hands" etc...
I'm skeptical this is going to go over well. I'd love to see an example of what is, and what isn't, a violation. |
|
Threaded Mode
|
|
LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/56410-tuck-rule-no-helmet-rule-yes.html
|
||||
| Posted By | For | Type | Date | Hits |
| Tuck rule no, Helmet rule yes | This thread | Refback | 03-20-2013 12:05 PM | 18 |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:39 PM.
