Tuck rule no, Helmet rule yes

Danno · 03-20-2013, 03:05 PM

Originally Posted by AllSaints

I dont think it is as bad as yall are making it out to be.... geezzz

You may be right, but based on what I've seen them do with the "defensless receiver" and the new catch rules concerning a "football move", and the "fumble/no fumble ball moving as it hits the ground but still in his hands" etc...

I'm skeptical this is going to go over well.

I'd love to see an example of what is, and what isn't, a violation.

Papa Voodoo · 03-20-2013, 03:23 PM

Originally Posted by Danno

You may be right, but based on what I've seen them do with the "defensless receiver" and the new catch rules concerning a "football move", and the "fumble/no fumble ball moving as it hits the ground but still in his hands" etc...

I'm skeptical this is going to go over well.

I'd love to see an example of what is, and what isn't, a violation.

The commissioner will arbitraily decide on violations and penalties based on popularity of the player/franchise like all of the other illegal hits.

Mardigras9 · 03-20-2013, 03:47 PM

Originally Posted by Papa Voodoo

The commissioner will arbitraily decide on violations and penalties based on popularity of the player/franchise like all of the other illegal hits.

Well I guess we'll know who will be the most penalized team if this is the governing party.

03-20-2013, 03:05 PM	#1
Danno Truth Addict Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Spanish Fort, AL (via NO and B/R) Posts: 24,758	Re: Tuck rule no, Helmet rule yes Originally Posted by AllSaints I dont think it is as bad as yall are making it out to be.... geezzz You may be right, but based on what I've seen them do with the "defensless receiver" and the new catch rules concerning a "football move", and the "fumble/no fumble ball moving as it hits the ground but still in his hands" etc... I'm skeptical this is going to go over well. I'd love to see an example of what is, and what isn't, a violation. spkb25 likes this.

03-20-2013, 03:23 PM	#2
Papa Voodoo 1000 Posts + Join Date: Jun 2007 Posts: 1,634	Re: Tuck rule no, Helmet rule yes Originally Posted by Danno You may be right, but based on what I've seen them do with the "defensless receiver" and the new catch rules concerning a "football move", and the "fumble/no fumble ball moving as it hits the ground but still in his hands" etc... I'm skeptical this is going to go over well. I'd love to see an example of what is, and what isn't, a violation. The commissioner will arbitraily decide on violations and penalties based on popularity of the player/franchise like all of the other illegal hits.

03-20-2013, 03:47 PM	#3
Mardigras9 Site Donor 2015 Join Date: Dec 2010 Location: Land Mass between LA and AL Posts: 4,375	Re: Tuck rule no, Helmet rule yes Originally Posted by Papa Voodoo The commissioner will arbitraily decide on violations and penalties based on popularity of the player/franchise like all of the other illegal hits. Well I guess we'll know who will be the most penalized team if this is the governing party.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

LinkBacks (?) LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/56410-tuck-rule-no-helmet-rule-yes.html
Posted By	For	Type	Date	Hits
Tuck rule no, Helmet rule yes	This thread	Refback	03-20-2013 12:05 PM	18