Terron Armstead

TheOak · 04-09-2013, 01:42 PM

Originally Posted by Rugby Saint II

Isn't that what they call a reach?

No idea of the lingo.

triman · 04-09-2013, 04:56 PM

Armstead is a 3rd player that would be well worth our pick at #77. I would love to have him. Barrett Jones is another player I would love to have. I see both guys playing well on Sundays. In fact I would advocate trading up in the 3rd to get either.

lumm0x · 04-09-2013, 06:29 PM

An Al Davis pick. Never fall in love with combine players.

FinSaint · 04-10-2013, 02:57 AM

Originally Posted by triman

Armstead is a 3rd player that would be well worth our pick at #77. I would love to have him. Barrett Jones is another player I would love to have. I see both guys playing well on Sundays. In fact I would advocate trading up in the 3rd to get either.

The signs are pointing toward Barrett Jones being a second round pick, so a 3rd wouldn't in all likelihood be enough to land him.

burningmetal · 04-10-2013, 05:53 AM

[quote=TheOak;492930]"Common sense" would dictate that you read my post and its fairly clear I didn't say I wanted anyone.

I did read your post. And I did NOT say that you wanted Armstead, per se. If you would have read my wording more carefully you would have understood my point.

You responded to a post about possibly trading back in the 1st round, acquiring a 2nd rounder and picking Armstead. You suggested that IF we wanted him we could simply draft him in the first. Which led me to question whether you would really draft a player who is a 2nd round project at best, in the 1st, instead of trading back. It doesn't have to be Armstead in particular.

It remains to be seen if trading back is the best option (depending on who is available when we pick), and I'm not sure I would draft Armstead if we had a second rounder, but you trivialized that person's post by proposing a senseless alternative. That's about as diplomatic as I can put it.

hagan714 · 04-10-2013, 06:19 AM

OT/OG is not what we need.
OT/TE is the way to go in my book.

i stick with a forth round value on my big board

TheOak · 04-10-2013, 01:47 PM

[quote=burningmetal;493154]

Originally Posted by TheOak

"Common sense" would dictate that you read my post and its fairly clear I didn't say I wanted anyone.

I did read your post. And I did NOT say that you wanted Armstead, per se. If you would have read my wording more carefully you would have understood my point.

You responded to a post about possibly trading back in the 1st round, acquiring a 2nd rounder and picking Armstead. You suggested that IF we wanted him we could simply draft him in the first. Which led me to question whether you would really draft a player who is a 2nd round project at best, in the 1st, instead of trading back. It doesn't have to be Armstead in particular.

It remains to be seen if trading back is the best option (depending on who is available when we pick), and I'm not sure I would draft Armstead if we had a second rounder, but you trivialized that person's post by proposing a senseless alternative. That's about as diplomatic as I can put it.

Here is my best attempt at diplomacy.

burningmetal · 04-10-2013, 07:08 PM

[quote=TheOak;493224]

Originally Posted by burningmetal

Here is my best attempt at diplomacy.

Because you refuse to explain yourself? Nice contribution. All sarcasm, no information. Other people are serious, whether you agree with them or not.

The least you can do is give a yes or no, and a reason why. Saying we can draft a second round guy in the first if we want him is a senseless comment. Everybody knows the team can draft whoever they want, whenever they want, if the player is available. This is not a thread about who we take in the first however. But, your lack of interest in such matters is duly noted.

TheOak · 04-11-2013, 05:36 AM

Yawnnnn

Have you considered a career in politics? You seen fairly adept at filibustering.

homerj07 · 04-11-2013, 07:32 AM

I would like to see us trade down & Pick up a 2nd round pick & another 3rd & 4th round.

04-09-2013, 01:42 PM	#11
TheOak 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: Cypress Tx. Posts: 19,019	Re: Terron Armstead Originally Posted by Rugby Saint II Isn't that what they call a reach? No idea of the lingo.

04-09-2013, 04:56 PM	#12
triman 500th Post Join Date: Mar 2003 Posts: 783	Re: Terron Armstead Armstead is a 3rd player that would be well worth our pick at #77. I would love to have him. Barrett Jones is another player I would love to have. I see both guys playing well on Sundays. In fact I would advocate trading up in the 3rd to get either.
triman 500th Post Join Date: Mar 2003 Posts: 783

04-09-2013, 06:29 PM	#13
lumm0x Resident antediluvian Join Date: Jul 2002 Posts: 2,026	Re: Terron Armstead An Al Davis pick. Never fall in love with combine players. SaintnDE likes this.

04-10-2013, 02:57 AM	#14
FinSaint Site Donor 2015 Join Date: Aug 2011 Location: Finland... formerly Southern Virginia Posts: 4,961	Re: Terron Armstead Originally Posted by triman Armstead is a 3rd player that would be well worth our pick at #77. I would love to have him. Barrett Jones is another player I would love to have. I see both guys playing well on Sundays. In fact I would advocate trading up in the 3rd to get either. The signs are pointing toward Barrett Jones being a second round pick, so a 3rd wouldn't in all likelihood be enough to land him.

04-10-2013, 05:53 AM	#15
burningmetal 1000 Posts + Join Date: Mar 2012 Posts: 3,923 Blog Entries: 3	Re: Terron Armstead [quote=TheOak;492930]"Common sense" would dictate that you read my post and its fairly clear I didn't say I wanted anyone. I did read your post. And I did NOT say that you wanted Armstead, per se. If you would have read my wording more carefully you would have understood my point. You responded to a post about possibly trading back in the 1st round, acquiring a 2nd rounder and picking Armstead. You suggested that IF we wanted him we could simply draft him in the first. Which led me to question whether you would really draft a player who is a 2nd round project at best, in the 1st, instead of trading back. It doesn't have to be Armstead in particular. It remains to be seen if trading back is the best option (depending on who is available when we pick), and I'm not sure I would draft Armstead if we had a second rounder, but you trivialized that person's post by proposing a senseless alternative. That's about as diplomatic as I can put it.
	If I had a nickel for every time I heard that, the NFL would fine and suspend me.

Latest Blogs
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey

04-10-2013, 06:19 AM	#16
hagan714 LB Mentallity Join Date: Dec 2005 Posts: 15,870 Blog Entries: 68	Re: Terron Armstead OT/OG is not what we need. OT/TE is the way to go in my book. i stick with a forth round value on my big board

04-10-2013, 01:47 PM	#17
TheOak 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: Cypress Tx. Posts: 19,019	Re: Terron Armstead [quote=burningmetal;493154] Originally Posted by TheOak "Common sense" would dictate that you read my post and its fairly clear I didn't say I wanted anyone. I did read your post. And I did NOT say that you wanted Armstead, per se. If you would have read my wording more carefully you would have understood my point. You responded to a post about possibly trading back in the 1st round, acquiring a 2nd rounder and picking Armstead. You suggested that IF we wanted him we could simply draft him in the first. Which led me to question whether you would really draft a player who is a 2nd round project at best, in the 1st, instead of trading back. It doesn't have to be Armstead in particular. It remains to be seen if trading back is the best option (depending on who is available when we pick), and I'm not sure I would draft Armstead if we had a second rounder, but you trivialized that person's post by proposing a senseless alternative. That's about as diplomatic as I can put it. Here is my best attempt at diplomacy.
	Last edited by TheOak; 04-10-2013 at 02:30 PM..

04-10-2013, 07:08 PM	#18
burningmetal 1000 Posts + Join Date: Mar 2012 Posts: 3,923 Blog Entries: 3	Re: Terron Armstead [quote=TheOak;493224] Originally Posted by burningmetal Here is my best attempt at diplomacy. Because you refuse to explain yourself? Nice contribution. All sarcasm, no information. Other people are serious, whether you agree with them or not. The least you can do is give a yes or no, and a reason why. Saying we can draft a second round guy in the first if we want him is a senseless comment. Everybody knows the team can draft whoever they want, whenever they want, if the player is available. This is not a thread about who we take in the first however. But, your lack of interest in such matters is duly noted.

04-11-2013, 05:36 AM	#19
TheOak 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: Cypress Tx. Posts: 19,019	Re: Terron Armstead Yawnnnn Have you considered a career in politics? You seen fairly adept at filibustering.

04-11-2013, 07:32 AM	#20
homerj07 In Doh We Trust Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Central Florida Posts: 7,027 Blog Entries: 16	Re: Terron Armstead I would like to see us trade down & Pick up a 2nd round pick & another 3rd & 4th round.

LinkBacks (?) LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/56887-terron-armstead.html
Posted By	For	Type	Date	Hits
The Latest New Orleans Saints News \| SportSpyder	This thread	Refback	04-08-2013 09:04 PM	5
Terron Armstead	This thread	Refback	04-08-2013 08:32 PM	41