Re: Malcolm Jenkins could see more nickel
 

You wouldn't. You'd draft his replacement and give him a year to learn.

Re: Malcolm Jenkins could see more nickel
 

Danno you tried to say that **** about Corey White last year too, I remember arguing with you then. It was in the middle of game and Then like three straight passes went to the rec. he was covering and all of sudden no more comments from Danno...

Re: Malcolm Jenkins could see more nickel
 

Nonsense, absolute nonsense.

Exaggerate much?

He had 2 bad plays in the Seattle game. Even Gregg Williams made that point.
Jenkins and our LB's were the ones abused over and over in the 49er playoff game.

Don't remember him getting "destroyed" in the Tampa game.

Thats just ridiculous. Whats next, he's responsible for Global Warming?

Geez I thought you were way more football savvy than that crap.

Re: Malcolm Jenkins could see more nickel
 

Face it; Harper is the perfect in the box strong safety... Right where Rob Ryan plays his strong safety in the "46"...

You'll just have to boo him when he's racking up those TFL's and sacks...

Re: Malcolm Jenkins could see more nickel
 

San Fran game was him and MJ getting abused by VD. The Seattle game he got obliterated to my memory. Guarantee he won't be with us after this year. They'll bring in Vac with MJ at nickel and put Harper up by the line to bring pressure.

Re: Malcolm Jenkins could see more nickel
 

That has nothing to do with coverage. Enjoy his last season with us

Re: Malcolm Jenkins could see more nickel
 

My opinion of Corey White was that he struggled early because injuries forced him into action way too early. He got better as the season progressed.

If you call out a player for making a mistake that was actually someone elses fault, I'm gonna disagree. If that rubs you the wrong way thats your problem, not mine.

Re: Malcolm Jenkins could see more nickel
 

I remember the whole defense getting obliterated against Seattle; Marshawn Lynch just didn't run through Harper on that 80 yard touchdown run...

Re: Malcolm Jenkins could see more nickel
 

I noticed you ignored answering my point.... there ya go

Re: Malcolm Jenkins could see more nickel
 

who is talking about one run, we are talking about coverage. I believe you're lost.

Re: Malcolm Jenkins could see more nickel
 

Make a valid one and perhaps he'll respond.;)

Re: Malcolm Jenkins could see more nickel
 

They could have saved 3 million, if they would have cut him early in the offseason... If he was so bad they would have cut him when they signed Leonhard, why didn't they?

Or give the starting job to Quaddus or Bush, they have shown promise...

Re: Malcolm Jenkins could see more nickel
 

I think him saying we would cut Harper and me pointing out how that is inaccurate since it saves us no money to do that is more than accurate. Especially when we are up against the cap.

Re: Malcolm Jenkins could see more nickel
 

From my understanding we save virtually nothing. This is his last year with us, enjoy it.

Quaddus I like. Not sure if he can be full time starter or not, but definitely heads and shoulder better in coverage.

Bush I disagree with at this point

Re: Malcolm Jenkins could see more nickel
 

well I have to get up in the morning. I'll leave it to the ladies

Re: Malcolm Jenkins could see more nickel
 

That would mean the Saints Brass would have to admit a mistake with his contract...

Roll Tide!

Saints fans not in denial know Harper can't cover, can't catch, can't tackle, but they take the good with the bad and don't want to come off as haters...but differing opinions is what makes it great...

me, hate Roman Harper's Game...

Re: Malcolm Jenkins could see more nickel
 

Jenkins may see more nickel, but he won't see more coin from the Saints...

Now if he has an All-Pro Season, then things change...

Re: Malcolm Jenkins could see more nickel
 

The Saints took a very gifted athlete who excelled at CB in college and tried to make him a safety. For whatever reason it hasn't worked. If he's moved back to CB and used in a man scheme he will excel again. He's big, strong, and fast enough. I fear JR will have the same lack of success at OLB. Only the most gifted can make a position change at the NFL level and succeed.

Re: Malcolm Jenkins could see more nickel
 

This

Re: Malcolm Jenkins could see more nickel
 

^ this.

Re: Malcolm Jenkins could see more nickel
 

We have such short memories. Jenkins aka "double move" used to get roasted at corner. He was so bad at corner we moved him to FS. I just don't get the love for him. He is a bust. Go back and watch the cowboys game in the dome a few years back. That game was the icing on the cake for that season for him.

Harper at least was a good at one time. But he has single handedly been the weak link in our defense the last couple of playoff games we lost. Vacarro is known for being able to cover guys bigger than him which has to be a reason we picked him up.

Re: Malcolm Jenkins could see more nickel
 

Your right about Harper, he is a pure a box SS as it gets, really none better but you need a FS to make up for him in the box and Jenkins can't do it.

Re: Malcolm Jenkins could see more nickel
 

As a rookie? One year in the league? One game?

I remember him muscling, taking the ball away from Washington receiver in his limited playing time...

Harper was good at one time? LMAO Devin Hester Pass Interference? Seattle TE Three Touchdowns? Green Bay I, II? Don't hate the player - just hate his game...

Re: Malcolm Jenkins could see more nickel
 

Jenkins and Vacarro would be the best safety mix in the long run in the pass happy league.

Re: Malcolm Jenkins could see more nickel
 

Harper led the league in sacks for a safety one year. He was also big in our 09 run - he was and is a stout run stopper.

Regarding MJ - the only thing I can say is that it took the front office only one year to know he wasn't going to be playing CB any more.

Re: Malcolm Jenkins could see more nickel
 

I read the title and thought.

Dude wants more money?!

Re: Malcolm Jenkins could see more nickel
 

Daze, what good is a corvette that can win a small load tractor pull if you can't win some quarter mile runs against some street punks or pick up the babes at the Daiquiri Shoppe?!?

Brother, he's a defensive back; a safety; last line of defense; he can't cover, he can't hit straight up; and he can't catch; he's slooooww...

You're right, he led the league in sacks as a safety, but how many times was he sent and didn't make the play?!? how many times was he sent more than contemporary safeties on other teams?!? We had to send him cause he was a liability in coverage...

I appreciate the love, but man when I hear the sack stat quote I keep asking, as a Defensive Back, shouldn't he be able to First, Cover?!?

The Sack thing should be a bonus as a DB, not what he hangs his hat on...