49er's shopping Parys Haralson

Danno · 08-26-2013, 03:38 PM

Originally Posted by TheOak

Honestly .... I would do that. Or draft picks....

I was coming to ask the important question.. What would you give up to get him?

Maybe a conditional mid-round draft pick.

Personally I'd rather scour the final cuts for a stop-gap vet while our young guys grow. Martin and RJohnson could be ready for rotation by mid-season. Atkins is decent depth, but not much more.

As far as player trades, we're loaded at WR so Moore is an option.
We finally have a decent looking back-up QB, but I'm not sure he'd draw much interest. Harper? Maybe.

SmashMouth · 08-26-2013, 03:45 PM

Originally Posted by Danno

Maybe a conditional mid-round draft pick.

Personally I'd rather scour the final cuts for a stop-gap vet while our young guys grow. Martin and RJohnson could be ready for rotation by mid-season. Atkins is decent depth, but not much more.

As far as player trades, we're loaded at WR so Moore is an option.
We finally have a decent looking back-up QB, but I'm not sure he'd draw much interest. Harper? Maybe.

halloween 65 · 08-26-2013, 03:43 PM

Originally Posted by TheOak

Honestly .... I would do that, if we were not SB contenders I wouldn't.. Or draft picks....

I was coming to ask the important question.. What would you give up to get him?

Malcolm Jenkins, no questions ask and throw in a 6th to get him gone!!

lee909 · 08-26-2013, 03:23 PM

With the amount of players they have and the draft picks they still hold,it might be possible to get him on a conditional pick.

biloxi-indian · 08-26-2013, 03:46 PM

For some reason the name Barrett Ruud comes to mind. What was it a seventh rounder?

ChrisXVI · 08-26-2013, 03:27 PM

I don't think we have a choice at this point. Send them a late-round pick and let's get it done.

papz · 08-26-2013, 03:47 PM

Haralson is a capable starter but a backup on the 49ers. Two rookies have moved in front of him and he's now running with the 3rd string defense there. He shouldn't cost more than a conditional late round pick(I wouldn't offer anything more than a 6th)... or we could just wait and hopefully land him via waivers.

As long as there aren't anymore injuries, I'm content with Galette, Lofton, Hawthorne, Wilson, Humber, Martin, and Johnson. We should just be patient and scour the waiver wire when the cuts start rolling in if we're going to look for some veteran depth. No need to panic or rush into anything. We're okay right now.

TheOak · 08-26-2013, 04:21 PM

SF isn't going to go for a late round pick alone for a few reasons.

1. SF has 8m in cap space.
2. Not going to make the defense he is liable to face in the playoffs better for free
3. He is a 5th rounder that SF has invested time and money into.
4. SF KNOWS our situation.

As Danno pointed out.... We are Deeeeeeep at WR. We are stocked at WR, honestly we have the next Colston, the Next Moore, Henderson...

I wouldn't give high picks.... I would lay out the following offers...

A. 5th and any of the following names; Cadet, Moore, Roby, Tanner

B. 4th and pick a name; Parker, Toone, Hakim

I get your point Papz, the flip side is we have WRs that we will lose anyway. May as well barter for value.

papz · 08-26-2013, 04:51 PM

Originally Posted by TheOak

SF isn't going to go for a late round pick alone for a few reasons.

1. SF has 8m in cap space.
2. Not going to make the defense he is liable to face in the playoffs better for free
3. He is a 5th rounder that SF has invested time and money into.
4. SF KNOWS our situation.

As Danno pointed out.... We are Deeeeeeep at WR. We are stocked at WR, honestly we have the next Colston, the Next Moore, Henderson...

I wouldn't give high picks.... I would lay out the following offers...

A. 5th and any of the following names; Cadet, Moore, Roby, Tanner

B. 4th and pick a name; Parker, Toone, Hakim

I get your point Papz, the flip side is we have WRs that we will lose anyway. May as well barter for value.

They definitely could use a WR but Lance Moore shouldn't be even in the realm of discussion... as it would not even be anywhere close in value. They'd likely to fork out a mid round pick plus Harrison for us to even consider moving Moore... which we shouldn't anyways.

The idea for the position swap between the two teams certainly makes sense... but I think we're overvaluing the pick necessary to facilitate a trade. We're talking about a guy that has been trending downward even before missing all of 2012... and that is their 7th LB'er on their depth chart(5th option at OLB) which essentially regulates him to special teams.

voodooido · 08-26-2013, 04:29 PM

Are you kidding me? Moore? Moore is by FAR our best wr behind Colston. That would be a Ditka move. No way.......

I would do Parker and a 5th.

08-26-2013, 03:38 PM	#1
Danno Truth Addict Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Spanish Fort, AL (via NO and B/R) Posts: 24,758	Re: 49er's shopping Parys Haralson Originally Posted by TheOak Honestly .... I would do that. Or draft picks.... I was coming to ask the important question.. What would you give up to get him? Maybe a conditional mid-round draft pick. Personally I'd rather scour the final cuts for a stop-gap vet while our young guys grow. Martin and RJohnson could be ready for rotation by mid-season. Atkins is decent depth, but not much more. As far as player trades, we're loaded at WR so Moore is an option. We finally have a decent looking back-up QB, but I'm not sure he'd draw much interest. Harper? Maybe. Halo, SmashMouth and MarchingOn like this.

08-26-2013, 03:45 PM	#2
SmashMouth I donated, did you? Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Mandeville, LA Posts: 38,926 Blog Entries: 29	Re: 49er's shopping Parys Haralson Originally Posted by Danno Maybe a conditional mid-round draft pick. Personally I'd rather scour the final cuts for a stop-gap vet while our young guys grow. Martin and RJohnson could be ready for rotation by mid-season. Atkins is decent depth, but not much more. As far as player trades, we're loaded at WR so Moore is an option. We finally have a decent looking back-up QB, but I'm not sure he'd draw much interest. Harper? Maybe.

08-26-2013, 03:43 PM	#3
halloween 65 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Sep 2011 Location: Grand Haven, Michigan by way of a little Mississippi River town in Louisiana Posts: 5,893	Re: 49er's shopping Parys Haralson Originally Posted by TheOak Honestly .... I would do that, if we were not SB contenders I wouldn't.. Or draft picks.... I was coming to ask the important question.. What would you give up to get him? Malcolm Jenkins, no questions ask and throw in a 6th to get him gone!!

08-26-2013, 03:23 PM	#4
lee909 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Mar 2012 Location: Watford England Posts: 8,875 Blog Entries: 1	Re: 49er's shopping Parys Haralson With the amount of players they have and the draft picks they still hold,it might be possible to get him on a conditional pick.

08-26-2013, 03:46 PM	#5
biloxi-indian Site Donor Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Southlake, TX Posts: 1,706	Re: 49er's shopping Parys Haralson For some reason the name Barrett Ruud comes to mind. What was it a seventh rounder?

08-26-2013, 03:27 PM	#6
ChrisXVI 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Aug 2011 Location: Madison, WI Posts: 11,482	Re: 49er's shopping Parys Haralson I don't think we have a choice at this point. Send them a late-round pick and let's get it done.

08-26-2013, 03:47 PM	#7
papz Problem? Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: New Orleans Posts: 11,793	Re: 49er's shopping Parys Haralson Haralson is a capable starter but a backup on the 49ers. Two rookies have moved in front of him and he's now running with the 3rd string defense there. He shouldn't cost more than a conditional late round pick(I wouldn't offer anything more than a 6th)... or we could just wait and hopefully land him via waivers. As long as there aren't anymore injuries, I'm content with Galette, Lofton, Hawthorne, Wilson, Humber, Martin, and Johnson. We should just be patient and scour the waiver wire when the cuts start rolling in if we're going to look for some veteran depth. No need to panic or rush into anything. We're okay right now. Halo, SmashMouth and MarchingOn like this.
	Everyone is entitled to be stupid, but some abuse the privilege. All little common sense goes a long way. Last edited by papz; 08-26-2013 at 03:57 PM..

08-26-2013, 04:21 PM	#8
TheOak 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: Cypress Tx. Posts: 19,050	Re: 49er's shopping Parys Haralson SF isn't going to go for a late round pick alone for a few reasons. 1. SF has 8m in cap space. 2. Not going to make the defense he is liable to face in the playoffs better for free 3. He is a 5th rounder that SF has invested time and money into. 4. SF KNOWS our situation. As Danno pointed out.... We are Deeeeeeep at WR. We are stocked at WR, honestly we have the next Colston, the Next Moore, Henderson... I wouldn't give high picks.... I would lay out the following offers... A. 5th and any of the following names; Cadet, Moore, Roby, Tanner B. 4th and pick a name; Parker, Toone, Hakim I get your point Papz, the flip side is we have WRs that we will lose anyway. May as well barter for value.
	It's not what you look at that matters, it's what you see. ~ Henry David Thoreau

08-26-2013, 04:51 PM	#9
papz Problem? Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: New Orleans Posts: 11,793	Re: 49er's shopping Parys Haralson Originally Posted by TheOak SF isn't going to go for a late round pick alone for a few reasons. 1. SF has 8m in cap space. 2. Not going to make the defense he is liable to face in the playoffs better for free 3. He is a 5th rounder that SF has invested time and money into. 4. SF KNOWS our situation. As Danno pointed out.... We are Deeeeeeep at WR. We are stocked at WR, honestly we have the next Colston, the Next Moore, Henderson... I wouldn't give high picks.... I would lay out the following offers... A. 5th and any of the following names; Cadet, Moore, Roby, Tanner B. 4th and pick a name; Parker, Toone, Hakim I get your point Papz, the flip side is we have WRs that we will lose anyway. May as well barter for value. They definitely could use a WR but Lance Moore shouldn't be even in the realm of discussion... as it would not even be anywhere close in value. They'd likely to fork out a mid round pick plus Harrison for us to even consider moving Moore... which we shouldn't anyways. The idea for the position swap between the two teams certainly makes sense... but I think we're overvaluing the pick necessary to facilitate a trade. We're talking about a guy that has been trending downward even before missing all of 2012... and that is their 7th LB'er on their depth chart(5th option at OLB) which essentially regulates him to special teams. iceshack149 likes this.
	Everyone is entitled to be stupid, but some abuse the privilege. All little common sense goes a long way.

08-26-2013, 04:29 PM	#10
voodooido 1000 Posts + Join Date: Oct 2009 Posts: 2,842	Re: 49er's shopping Parys Haralson Are you kidding me? Moore? Moore is by FAR our best wr behind Colston. That would be a Ditka move. No way....... I would do Parker and a 5th.
voodooido 1000 Posts + Join Date: Oct 2009 Posts: 2,842

LinkBacks (?) LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/59784-49ers-shopping-parys-haralson.html
Posted By	For	Type	Date	Hits
The Latest New Orleans Saints News \| SportSpyder	This thread	Refback	08-26-2013 03:27 PM	5
49er's shopping Parys Haralson	This thread	Refback	08-26-2013 02:52 PM	65