dizzle88

Only thing i have a slight issue with if it is true is our RB depth

If ingram goes, PT has only just got healthy, if he gets injured again we have sproles and maybe khiry robinson who (so far) has looked good against a 3rd team defense, not first stringers

|Mitch|

Funny; no one else is reporting it... I would think that Mike Triplett or the likes would have said something. I don't believe it...

Rugby Saint II

Two young promising players with Cadet and Robinson.....Only one needs to really get in the rotation. The powers that be could run PT, Sproles and rotate in either Robinson or Cadet as needed.
What do we get in return though? We need something now. Although, I would take a second round offer for him in next years draft. It's been so long since we chose in the second round.........I'm not sure we would remember how to do it.

Saintaintso

Ingram for Troy Polamalu ?

Saintaintso

Would help Keenan Lewis's argument lol

Saintaintso

That I wouldn't have a problem with

thebdj

Wow, you sit down and watch just ONE film with the wife and you come back here and BOOM, the trade block has gone mental

As I have been defending Ingram at length, I feel it worth mentioning that I personally would be delighted to trade him for the right package. A perfect package would include a warm body but if we could genuinely get multiple draft picks, whether conditional or not, especially if one of them was a 2nd (!!!!!) then I will drive him to New York myself!

Oddly I don't think NYG puts him in a considerably better scheme than he is already in and he would be up against another projected stud RB.

Do we have enough depth to cope with losing Ingram? At the end of the day I trust in Mickey and Sean. If they think Robinson and Cadet are ample replacements for Ingram and Ivory for this season and, perhaps, moving forward, then bag the picks and keep on building!

PS - I would also love to see papz change his handle to c0ckmonger. Some outlandish statements sometimes backfire. May this be one of them for all the right reasons

TheOak

Depends on how you look at it. In my fuzzy logic way of looking at things the starting defensive front 7 are playing our starting o-line.... It's all about finding and reading holes for a RB... Not Robinson vs Peters/Babineaux/Umenyiora when we play Atlanta, so what string doesn't matter as long as there are holes to run through....

Correct?

It's the Falcons o-line vs our d-front 7 to see if there is a hole and not Steven Jackson vs our front 7.

thebdj

@TheOak - In fact you may argue it is more difficult as there may be more mistakes being made so you need to think more on your feet. Maybe he made a more difficult situation look even easier.

That is MY fuzzy logic!

Jack Vegas

The funny thing is, I have Ingram as the #3 RB on my fantasy football team, and as much as I hate to see him leave the Saints as a Saints fan, I would have a serious edge over every team in my league if my #3 RB was a full-time starter.