Malcolm Jenkins

Beastmode · 09-23-2013, 02:57 AM

At first I thought it was just damn lucky but it's hard to make that argument anymore. They are absolutely getting pressure without blitzing. When you can do that then you have a real defense.

Jack Vegas · 09-23-2013, 04:23 AM

Originally Posted by |Mitch|

I chalk it up to showing them something different, we didn't run as much three safety looks as the past 2 games?!

Actually we played 3 safeties most of the first half (sorry, haven't re-watched the second half yet), with Bush and Jenkins back deep and Vaccaro roving around the box around the linebackers.

I was actually reallly impressed with Bush in this game. He is not just a special teamer, he's a real football player.

Originally Posted by Beastmode

At first I thought it was just damn lucky but it's hard to make that argument anymore. They are absolutely getting pressure without blitzing. When you can do that then you have a real defense.

I think I said this during the game but this team's four-man rush reminds me of Haslett's first year team. Joe Johnson, Norman Hand, Laroi Glover and Darren Howard. But this defense has much better players in the back 7, and with Galette and Jordan moving around all over the place they are getting pass rush from all kinds of different directions. We actually played a four-man line most of this game but even when they played three they still got a big push.

hagan714 · 09-23-2013, 08:06 AM

Originally Posted by RailBoss

It looks like Ryan makes adjustments on the fly and doesn't stick to just reading off his I-HOP menu.

i have not seen anything really different than what Willaims had the team do before the Spags Era.

I do credit him with letting these players play.

jeanpierre · 09-23-2013, 08:16 AM

Don't see us shelling out big money to keep Jenkins...

Besides, we do better with younger, faster, cap friendly contracts on defenses - you know - young and hungry...

alleycat_126 · 09-23-2013, 08:20 AM

Originally Posted by RailBoss

It looks like Ryan makes adjustments on the fly and doesn't stick to just reading off his I-HOP menu.

I HOP menu!!!! LOL

alleycat_126 · 09-23-2013, 08:28 AM

Originally Posted by hagan714

i have not seen anything really different than what Willaims had the team do before the Spags Era.

I do credit him with letting these players play.

I disagree, ROB's pressures seem not to leave us wide open for getting beat. D line is getting home like I haven't seen even in the times of Greg Williams..... I do remember Greg getting home.... but he used everyone.... and all out blitzed a lot....

alleycat_126 · 09-23-2013, 08:36 AM

Originally Posted by jeanpierre

Don't see us shelling out big money to keep Jenkins...

Besides, we do better with younger, faster, cap friendly contracts on defenses - you know - young and hungry...

those aren't good words to use together.... please call them something else besides Young and Hungry.... You wanna ask Washington Redskins def. coordinator Raheem Morris how those two words work together when talking about a "YOUNGRY" defense....

SaintsBro · 09-23-2013, 12:33 PM

Led your Who Dat chant! That's getting to be a bigger deal than having your face on the ticket!

09-23-2013, 02:57 AM	#11
Beastmode 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Jul 2010 Posts: 9,126	Re: Malcolm Jenkins At first I thought it was just damn lucky but it's hard to make that argument anymore. They are absolutely getting pressure without blitzing. When you can do that then you have a real defense.
Beastmode 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Jul 2010 Posts: 9,126

09-23-2013, 04:23 AM	#12
Jack Vegas 1000 Posts + Join Date: Jul 2011 Posts: 2,254	Re: Malcolm Jenkins Originally Posted by \|Mitch\| I chalk it up to showing them something different, we didn't run as much three safety looks as the past 2 games?! Actually we played 3 safeties most of the first half (sorry, haven't re-watched the second half yet), with Bush and Jenkins back deep and Vaccaro roving around the box around the linebackers. I was actually reallly impressed with Bush in this game. He is not just a special teamer, he's a real football player. Originally Posted by Beastmode At first I thought it was just damn lucky but it's hard to make that argument anymore. They are absolutely getting pressure without blitzing. When you can do that then you have a real defense. I think I said this during the game but this team's four-man rush reminds me of Haslett's first year team. Joe Johnson, Norman Hand, Laroi Glover and Darren Howard. But this defense has much better players in the back 7, and with Galette and Jordan moving around all over the place they are getting pass rush from all kinds of different directions. We actually played a four-man line most of this game but even when they played three they still got a big push. exiled likes this.
Jack Vegas 1000 Posts + Join Date: Jul 2011 Posts: 2,254

09-23-2013, 08:06 AM	#13
hagan714 LB Mentallity Join Date: Dec 2005 Posts: 15,870 Blog Entries: 68	Re: Malcolm Jenkins Originally Posted by RailBoss It looks like Ryan makes adjustments on the fly and doesn't stick to just reading off his I-HOP menu. i have not seen anything really different than what Willaims had the team do before the Spags Era. I do credit him with letting these players play.

09-23-2013, 08:16 AM	#14
jeanpierre Site Donor 2018 Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Thibodaux Posts: 43,543 Blog Entries: 39	Re: Malcolm Jenkins Don't see us shelling out big money to keep Jenkins... Besides, we do better with younger, faster, cap friendly contracts on defenses - you know - young and hungry...

09-23-2013, 08:20 AM	#15
alleycat_126 1000 Posts + Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Katy, Tx a suburb of Houston Posts: 2,089	Re: Malcolm Jenkins Originally Posted by RailBoss It looks like Ryan makes adjustments on the fly and doesn't stick to just reading off his I-HOP menu. I HOP menu!!!! LOL

Latest Blogs
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey

09-23-2013, 08:28 AM	#16
alleycat_126 1000 Posts + Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Katy, Tx a suburb of Houston Posts: 2,089	Re: Malcolm Jenkins Originally Posted by hagan714 i have not seen anything really different than what Willaims had the team do before the Spags Era. I do credit him with letting these players play. I disagree, ROB's pressures seem not to leave us wide open for getting beat. D line is getting home like I haven't seen even in the times of Greg Williams..... I do remember Greg getting home.... but he used everyone.... and all out blitzed a lot....

09-23-2013, 08:36 AM	#17
alleycat_126 1000 Posts + Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Katy, Tx a suburb of Houston Posts: 2,089	Re: Malcolm Jenkins Originally Posted by jeanpierre Don't see us shelling out big money to keep Jenkins... Besides, we do better with younger, faster, cap friendly contracts on defenses - you know - young and hungry... those aren't good words to use together.... please call them something else besides Young and Hungry.... You wanna ask Washington Redskins def. coordinator Raheem Morris how those two words work together when talking about a "YOUNGRY" defense....

09-23-2013, 12:33 PM	#18
SaintsBro Site Donor Join Date: Sep 2010 Location: in line with my ridiculous CLEAR PLASTIC BAG Posts: 3,650 Blog Entries: 3	Re: Malcolm Jenkins Led your Who Dat chant! That's getting to be a bigger deal than having your face on the ticket!

LinkBacks (?) LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/60535-malcolm-jenkins.html
Posted By	For	Type	Date	Hits
The Latest New Orleans Saints News \| SportSpyder	This thread	Refback	09-22-2013 09:15 PM	1
Malcolm Jenkins	This thread	Refback	09-22-2013 03:56 PM	8