Register All Albums FAQ Community Experience
Go Back   New Orleans Saints Forums - blackandgold.com > Main > Saints

We should know who we are

this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; Originally Posted by Boutte We've hit the halfway mark and we're sitting at 6-2. We looked bad in todays loss but we were a couple of screw ups away from winning. A couple of weeks ago we were one play ...

Like Tree24Likes

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-04-2013, 09:31 AM   #1
A Cajun Transforming TX
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: The Woodlands, Texas
Posts: 2,787
Re: We should know who we are

Originally Posted by Boutte View Post
We've hit the halfway mark and we're sitting at 6-2. We looked bad in todays loss but we were a couple of screw ups away from winning. A couple of weeks ago we were one play away from beating the Pats. In other words we're a couple of plays from 8-0.

But let's not kid ourselves, we're not a dominant football team. We're not as bad as a lot of the knee jerk posters are saying we are either. Our offense is still potent but it's definitely bi-polar. We can't run!

I don't agree with the people who faulted Payton for abandoning the run today. He knows what this offense can and can't do and there was no point in wasting plays and possessions running our RBs into a brick wall. There will be games where running serves a purpose but this wasn't one of them. If either Colston or Sproles played today we win!

The only reason we're one of the best teams in the league is Sean Payton and Drew Brees. Lose either one of those two we're strictly average, if that.
Only thing I disagree with is your statement of Payton abandoning the run. You would first have to run the ball in the first quarter to say you abandon the run.
Budsdrinker is offline  
Old 11-04-2013, 09:55 AM   #2
Hou Saints Fan
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Houston, Tx
Posts: 5,050
Re: We should know who we are

Time for Pete to start calling plays again, that 3rd string TE end around on a 4th and one still has me puzzled, really?
RaginCajun83 is offline  
Old 11-04-2013, 09:59 AM   #3
Cake or Death?
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 3,608
Re: We should know who we are

Originally Posted by RaginCajun83 View Post
Time for Pete to start calling plays again, that 3rd string TE end around on a 4th and one still has me puzzled, really?
The most puzzling part was that it was to Josh Hill. Really? If you are going to call that play use a WR like Stills or Meach. Although, I don't like it in any scenario. Let Drew throw the ball if you aren't confident in your running game.
exile is offline  
Old 11-04-2013, 10:12 AM   #4
Site Donor
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: in line with my ridiculous CLEAR PLASTIC BAG
Posts: 3,650
Blog Entries: 3
Re: We should know who we are

Serious question: does anybody KNOW for sure if Sean Payton still "scripts" the first 10 to 14 plays of the game, beforehand?? Because if he does, that was a pretty ridiculous, extremely pass-happy script. Pierre got 4 yards on one of them, but why abandon it?

I've often felt that the "pass happy" or "abandoning the run" thing comes from, Payton scripts those first dozen or so plays, and if he does not get the results he wants from the scripted runs, if it doesn't get huge chunks of yardage, he gets impatient, that "OCD" part of his personality kicks in and takes over, and he starts passing the ball all over the place. That's what I always felt from 2006-2009 when the whole "pass happy" thing was at its biggest argument.

The first quarter, you had Pierre for 4. Ingram for 2. Pierre for 0. And 20 passes. Sheez Louise.

Also wondering, if maybe Sproles being out, caused Payton to get out the Sharpie and scratch a bunch of planned running plays off the playsheet, that required Sproles to work, either as running back or decoy. It could have been some specific schemes and plays where "next man up" really didn't hold true because there was NO next man up, who could do the specific job of Sproles. I dunno.
hagan714 likes this.
SaintsBro is offline  
Old 11-04-2013, 10:24 AM   #5
Site Donor MONTHLY
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: New Orleans, LA
Posts: 20,866
Blog Entries: 45
Re: We should know who we are

Originally Posted by SaintsBro View Post
Serious question: does anybody KNOW for sure if Sean Payton still "scripts" the first 10 to 14 plays of the game, beforehand?? Because if he does, that was a pretty ridiculous, extremely pass-happy script. Pierre got 4 yards on one of them, but why abandon it?

I've often felt that the "pass happy" or "abandoning the run" thing comes from, Payton scripts those first dozen or so plays, and if he does not get the results he wants from the scripted runs, if it doesn't get huge chunks of yardage, he gets impatient, that "OCD" part of his personality kicks in and takes over, and he starts passing the ball all over the place. That's what I always felt from 2006-2009 when the whole "pass happy" thing was at its biggest argument.

The first quarter, you had Pierre for 4. Ingram for 2. Pierre for 0. And 20 passes. Sheez Louise.

Also wondering, if maybe Sproles being out, caused Payton to get out the Sharpie and scratch a bunch of planned running plays off the playsheet, that required Sproles to work, either as running back or decoy. It could have been some specific schemes and plays where "next man up" really didn't hold true because there was NO next man up, who could do the specific job of Sproles. I dunno.
Yeah, next man up is Cadet, but he hardly makes an appearance. Why scrap the game plan and go with full throttle passing? Even Sproles is more receiver than runningback. I'm with you on the confusion of the play-calls. I think SP is the final decision maker, but Carmichael also contributes. I just think they need to wake up - they've done it before.

Why the lack of confidence in Cadet? Why feel so low self esteem to run a reverse with the tight end? Not even Moore or.... blah.
Halo is offline  
Old 11-04-2013, 12:54 PM   #6
500th Post
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Harvey La.
Posts: 611
Re: We should know who we are

I was screaming QB sneek comeonman you could roll on the ground for a couple of inches at least. Being out played is one thing but stupidity is another. I think Payton needs to step off a bit and let the OC do his job.
Supertek is offline  
Old 11-05-2013, 12:52 PM   #7
Bounty Money $$$
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: 5800 Airline Dr. Metairie, LA.
Posts: 24,133
Re: We should know who we are

We also just barely won several games.
Rugby Saint II is offline  
Old 11-05-2013, 07:17 PM   #8
Site Donor
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: in line with my ridiculous CLEAR PLASTIC BAG
Posts: 3,650
Blog Entries: 3
Re: We should know who we are

Originally Posted by Rugby Saint II View Post
We also just barely won several games.
And yet we are #6 in the league in point differential, #11 in points scored, and #4 in points allowed.
SaintsBro is offline  
Old 11-06-2013, 10:56 AM   #9
E. Side Cholo
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: The Barrio, H-town
Posts: 6,089
Re: We should know who we are

Where is Jim Mora's mouth, when we need it.


Anybody remember what happened the next 3 weeks after he
made this speech? (hint, they did something they had never done
3 weeks in a row in history)
skymike is offline  
Old 11-05-2013, 07:03 PM   #10
E. Side Cholo
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: The Barrio, H-town
Posts: 6,089
Re: We should know who we are

This game looks like 1 or 2 games we have every year. The home team
& crowd is all psyched up. They smother Drew & our offense. We get
ambushed by a St. Louis Rams. We have sucked at short yardage the entire
Payton era, since Deuce retired.

Nothings really changed, except our O-line looks a little worse, and we
'werent able to pull out the magic at the end.
saintfan likes this.
skymike is offline  
Closed Thread


Posting Rules

LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/61633-we-should-know-who-we.html
Posted By For Type Date Hits
We should know who we are This thread Refback 11-03-2013 10:05 PM 24


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:28 AM.


Copyright 1997 - 2020 - BlackandGold.com
no new posts