![]() |
Re: I have a riddle for you
Quote:
|
Re: I have a riddle for you
Quote:
|
Re: I have a riddle for you
Agreed...O-line blocking scheme doesn't fit the personnel. It's illegal. And also, let's not forget--let's not forget, dude, that keeping wildlife, um, an amphibious rodent for, um, you know, domestic--within the city--that ain't legal either.
|
Re: I have a riddle for you
Quote:
|
Re: I have a riddle for you
Some of you guys get your panties knotted over reeeeaaaally silly things. You're grown ass men, or women, act like it. Sick of getting on here and seeing this one arguing with that one over stuff that neither has ANY control over. Disagreeing is one thing, but some of you resort to name calling and attacking the other guy's character entirely too quick. I did that once on here, then promptly apologized both publicly and privately. I'll bet that most of you wouldn't be so quick to act like a jackass if you didn't have the vastness of cyberspace as your shield... Grow up, cut the crap and quit ruining my favorite place to come for Saints info.. and don't tell me "well don't read it then" because it's almost unavoidable. What used to be confined to the political and smack talk forums has spilled out all over this site, and frankly it makes me want to vomit.
|
Re: I have a riddle for you
Preach it, frydaddy. It's easy to let things get out of hand when it ain't face-to-face. Also, sarcasm is even harder to decode on here.
This thread had so much promise. Oak's analysis was freakin' awesome and there was some time, thought and research put into it. |
Re: I have a riddle for you
Agreed on all points barry.
And I should apologize. I realize that some of what I said is not much better than what I'm griping about.. and I also don't mean to sound like a crybaby. It's just that I've been coming here for about 7 or 8 years now and it only seems to have gotten worse Anyway.. Sorry Oak, wasn't trying to threadjack you. Back on topic now - I know it probably is much easier said than done, but I would rather see them go back to something similar to their previous scheme. Different O line coach, so I wouldn't expect it to be a seamless transition back to the old way. Just.. I dunno, maybe try playing to their strengths for cripes sake! |
Re: I have a riddle for you
Quote:
These guys were good college lineman, but simply do not possess NFL starting ability. DLP seemed to do alright last year, but I can only assume there is a reason why he was cut from so many teams before. Like many people, I thought that the Saints had somehow turned the light on with him, but this year his play along with the others has dropped off dramatically. But because the Saints don't believe in investing in real offensive tackles, we are left with total crap on the edges, and not much better at center. All one need do is watch the try to run, or watch Brees run for his life to know that what I'm saying should be common knowledge. |
Re: I have a riddle for you
Quote:
You can disagree with me if you want. I don't care either way. I'm sensing a lot of butt hurt lately and it leaves me to wonder why this forum exists. |
Re: I have a riddle for you
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:28 AM. |
Copyright 1997 - 2020 - BlackandGold.com