|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; Originally Posted by Danno My guess is that if he hadn't hit Drew high, it would have been a sack. But thats a pretty interesting take. If someone commits PI in the endzone, why isn't the receiver credited with a ...
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#12 |
1000 Posts +
|
Re: Question penalty on Ahmad Brooks all you want, but not Drew Brees' toughness
Originally Posted by Danno
That's why I've always been at odds with holding in the endzone being called a safety. If that's the case then touchdowns SHOULD be awarded for interference in the endzone. ![]()
I really don't want penalties to result in automatic points, but it's the inconsistency in the rules that just make no sense. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/62136-question-penalty-ahmad-brooks-all-you-want-but-not-drew-brees-toughness.html
|
||||
Posted By | For | Type | Date | Hits |
The Latest New Orleans Saints News | SportSpyder | This thread | Refback | 11-20-2013 05:44 PM | 3 |
Question penalty on Ahmad Brooks all you want, but not Drew Brees' toughness | This thread | Refback | 11-20-2013 05:32 PM | 20 |