|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; If you simply look at the numbers for the season thus far, the Saints are 23rd best in the league running the ball and Seattle is 15th best in stopping the run... so, slight advantage to Seattle. In the passing ...
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Registered
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: In the moment
Posts: 44
|
Re: Running attack vs. Seahawks defense. Thoughts?
If you simply look at the numbers for the season thus far, the Saints are 23rd best in the league running the ball and Seattle is 15th best in stopping the run... so, slight advantage to Seattle.
In the passing game, the Saints are 2nd best in the league and Seattle's defense against the pass is 2nd best.... so I'll call that a push. Flipping it around, Seattle is 3rd best in running the ball and the Saints are 14th best in defending the run... advantage Seattle. And Seattle is 24th best passing the ball and the Saints are 3rd best defending the pass... advantage Saints. Both teams are excellent in defending the pass. Both teams are middle of the pack in defending the run. The Saints forte is passing the ball. Seattle's forte is running the ball. No surprise, right? Pretty much what we already knew. Imo, the outcome of the game will hinge on which team is more effective in establishing their run game and staying with it to the bitter end. It should be a helluva good game to watch and a credit to both organizations being featured on MNF late in the season. |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
100th Post
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Kirkland, WA
Posts: 188
|
Re: Running attack vs. Seahawks defense. Thoughts?
Originally Posted by onanygivenSu
Excellent analysis but that isn't what you said in the other and I quote: I disagree. Most of the advantages are in the Saints favor. ![]()
Last time the teams played in regular season, the Saints spanked the Seattle 34-19 in 2010, and 28-17 in 2008. Yes, Seattle won the playoff game in 2010 but I think that we'd all agree that game was clearly an aberration. Seattle just got lucky that day. Seattle has a midget for a QB who has never played in a MNF game before. That's huge. Think "deer in the headlights scared". They also run that Read Option gimmick offense because Wilson can't stay in the pocket and throw the ball effectively like Drew Brees. Seattle doesn't have a TE who is anywhere near as productive as Jimmy Graham. Hell, Zach Miller even seldom gets to go out for a pass because he's needed to stay on the line and block due to Seattle's inconsistent and weak O-line. And Seattle's so-called "Legion of Boom" is currently decimated by the injury to Brandon Browner and the fact that his back-up, Walter Thurmond, will be out due to a 4-game suspension. The Saints have the advantage in this game. Anyone who tells you different is fooling only themselves. You are a TROLL!! |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
5000 POSTS! +
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Grand Haven, Michigan by way of a little Mississippi River town in Louisiana
Posts: 5,893
|
Re: Running attack vs. Seahawks defense. Thoughts?
Originally Posted by Seahawks12th
11 on 11, rain or shine, no excuses here!!
![]()
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
100th Post
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Kirkland, WA
Posts: 188
|
Re: Running attack vs. Seahawks defense. Thoughts?
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
5000 POSTS! +
|
Re: Running attack vs. Seahawks defense. Thoughts?
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
1000 Posts +
|
Re: Running attack vs. Seahawks defense. Thoughts?
Originally Posted by Seahawks12th
WHOA![]()
Feel free, Seahawks12th, to build yourself a "family crest" like Slomotion and include Black and Gold! This post made my day! I was there in '08 and again in '10. They were two entirely different experiences for me but the only consistent element was that the 12th man was LOUD but also CLASSLESS. It's a shame, really, because a team deserves a crowd like yours, but visiting fans do not. Alaska |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Registered
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 53
|
Re: Running attack vs. Seahawks defense. Thoughts?
Nothing spectacular, but it'll be competent.
Statistically, the 49ers have a better run defense than the Seahawks do, and we ran it well vs the 49ers. |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
500th Post
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 957
|
Re: Running attack vs. Seahawks defense. Thoughts?
I'd have to say I'm a little less worried now that Seattle is hurting on CB's but as far as running goes. We should be able to get a decent amount. I don't see us gauging them on the ground but maybe Sean has a different plan.
Weather will also change things. |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Site Donor
Drew Brees GOAT |
Re: Running attack vs. Seahawks defense. Thoughts?
Originally Posted by dueceloose
A different plan, yes.![]()
With the Seahawks digging deep into having to play nickel and dime backs with little or no experience, the Saints will more than likely go pass heavy in this game and mix in the run just enough for the play action to be effective. 45 passes 20 runs |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/62285-running-attack-vs-seahawks-defense-thoughts.html
|
||||
Posted By | For | Type | Date | Hits |
Running attack vs. Seahawks defense. Thoughts? | This thread | Refback | 11-25-2013 04:56 PM | 5 |
The Latest New Orleans Saints News | SportSpyder | This thread | Refback | 11-25-2013 04:46 PM | 6 |