9-3

WHODATINCA · 12-03-2013, 12:04 AM

Originally Posted by foreverfan

It was obvious we were looking past Seattle to Carolina.

That doesn't seem possible, unless we were prepared to lose. That is not possible.

saintsfan403 · 12-02-2013, 11:16 PM

That was rough, but still didn't feel nearly as bad as losing to the Pats. Call me nuts but I think we take it to the panthers and carry that through to the rams.

saintsfan403 · 12-02-2013, 11:17 PM

I think this sums it up best, and by none other than Mr. Gleason-
Steve Gleason ‏@TeamGleason 1m
Well, that was brutal. Now, time to move on.
-SG

Jack Vegas · 12-02-2013, 11:21 PM

The difference to me was the secondary. We can't have Jenkins out there 1-on-1 against wide receivers. Maybe we have to sign a corner off the street or something but we aren't going to beat good passing teams with things the way they are in the secondary. I really thought that they'd be OK without Greer but it's not looking too good.

saintsfan403 · 12-02-2013, 11:27 PM

Originally Posted by Jack Vegas

The difference to me was the secondary. We can't have Jenkins out there 1-on-1 against wide receivers. Maybe we have to sign a corner off the street or something but we aren't going to beat good passing teams with things the way they are in the secondary. I really thought that they'd be OK without Greer but it's not looking too good.

I heard Bush went down in this game...does anyone know how long he was out for?

halloween 65 · 12-03-2013, 07:23 AM

Originally Posted by Jack Vegas

The difference to me was the secondary. We can't have Jenkins out there 1-on-1 against wide receivers. Maybe we have to sign a corner off the street or something but we aren't going to beat good passing teams with things the way they are in the secondary. I really thought that they'd be OK without Greer but it's not looking too good.

I liked how White and V played last night more so White. Not so much the rest of the secondary. Lofton got exposed again in coverage. I did think the D-line was good but all our lb.,s looked like crap along with the secondary.

hagan714 · 12-02-2013, 11:27 PM

once again a smash mouth team kicked our butts.

foreverfan · 12-02-2013, 11:29 PM

Originally Posted by TheOak

Not much to say about the game. Seattle played solid ball.

Let's get ready for Carolina on Sunday night at home.

Has anyone seen anything about Strief?

Notable stats:
Lynch 16-45 2.8 YPC
Ingram 5-16 3.2 YPC
Collins 1-12 12 YPC

Saints gave up 1 sack and 0 INTs.

Wait... did I miss something? Did we win?

saintsfan403 · 12-02-2013, 11:32 PM

Good news is that the panthers don't have half the secondary that Seattle does.

Cruize · 12-02-2013, 11:32 PM

-Seattle is the better team.
-Wilson is really good at what he's asked to do.
-It wasn't due to the outdoor facility.
-Saints were flat.
-The Saints somehow weren't prepared for the noise.
-Other than Colston, the Saints WR's are inconsistent at best to simply average.
-Jenkins blowing coverages.
-Linebackers blowing coverages.
-Vaccaro is not playing with the reckless abandon that made him special and also gave him the concussions. Hopefully he can adjust.
-Beat Carolina and win the #2 seed. SF can beat Seattle and the Saints can beat the 49ers in the dome.
-WHO DAT!

12-03-2013, 12:04 AM	#1
WHODATINCA Site Donor Join Date: Aug 2013 Location: South Bay Posts: 3,784	Re: 9-3 Originally Posted by foreverfan It was obvious we were looking past Seattle to Carolina. That doesn't seem possible, unless we were prepared to lose. That is not possible.

12-02-2013, 11:17 PM	#3
saintsfan403 1000 Posts + Join Date: Sep 2012 Location: WHO DAT NATION Posts: 2,261	Re: 9-3 I think this sums it up best, and by none other than Mr. Gleason- Steve Gleason ‏@TeamGleason 1m Well, that was brutal. Now, time to move on. -SG SloMotion likes this.

12-02-2013, 11:21 PM	#4
Jack Vegas 1000 Posts + Join Date: Jul 2011 Posts: 2,254	Re: 9-3 The difference to me was the secondary. We can't have Jenkins out there 1-on-1 against wide receivers. Maybe we have to sign a corner off the street or something but we aren't going to beat good passing teams with things the way they are in the secondary. I really thought that they'd be OK without Greer but it's not looking too good.
Jack Vegas 1000 Posts + Join Date: Jul 2011 Posts: 2,254

12-02-2013, 11:27 PM	#5
saintsfan403 1000 Posts + Join Date: Sep 2012 Location: WHO DAT NATION Posts: 2,261	Re: 9-3 Originally Posted by Jack Vegas The difference to me was the secondary. We can't have Jenkins out there 1-on-1 against wide receivers. Maybe we have to sign a corner off the street or something but we aren't going to beat good passing teams with things the way they are in the secondary. I really thought that they'd be OK without Greer but it's not looking too good. I heard Bush went down in this game...does anyone know how long he was out for?

12-03-2013, 07:23 AM	#6
halloween 65 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Sep 2011 Location: Grand Haven, Michigan by way of a little Mississippi River town in Louisiana Posts: 5,893	Re: 9-3 Originally Posted by Jack Vegas The difference to me was the secondary. We can't have Jenkins out there 1-on-1 against wide receivers. Maybe we have to sign a corner off the street or something but we aren't going to beat good passing teams with things the way they are in the secondary. I really thought that they'd be OK without Greer but it's not looking too good. I liked how White and V played last night more so White. Not so much the rest of the secondary. Lofton got exposed again in coverage. I did think the D-line was good but all our lb.,s looked like crap along with the secondary.

12-02-2013, 11:16 PM	#2
saintsfan403 1000 Posts + Join Date: Sep 2012 Location: WHO DAT NATION Posts: 2,261	Re: 9-3 That was rough, but still didn't feel nearly as bad as losing to the Pats. Call me nuts but I think we take it to the panthers and carry that through to the rams.

12-02-2013, 11:27 PM	#7
hagan714 LB Mentallity Join Date: Dec 2005 Posts: 15,870 Blog Entries: 68	Re: 9-3 once again a smash mouth team kicked our butts. halloween 65 and SloMotion like this.

12-02-2013, 11:29 PM	#8
foreverfan 12,000 BS Posts Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Metairie, LA Posts: 13,457 Blog Entries: 5	Re: 9-3 Originally Posted by TheOak Not much to say about the game. Seattle played solid ball. Let's get ready for Carolina on Sunday night at home. Has anyone seen anything about Strief? Notable stats: Lynch 16-45 2.8 YPC Ingram 5-16 3.2 YPC Collins 1-12 12 YPC Saints gave up 1 sack and 0 INTs. Wait... did I miss something? Did we win?

12-02-2013, 11:32 PM	#9
saintsfan403 1000 Posts + Join Date: Sep 2012 Location: WHO DAT NATION Posts: 2,261	Re: 9-3 Good news is that the panthers don't have half the secondary that Seattle does.

12-02-2013, 11:32 PM	#10
Cruize 1000 Posts + Join Date: May 2007 Posts: 4,467	Re: 9-3 -Seattle is the better team. -Wilson is really good at what he's asked to do. -It wasn't due to the outdoor facility. -Saints were flat. -The Saints somehow weren't prepared for the noise. -Other than Colston, the Saints WR's are inconsistent at best to simply average. -Jenkins blowing coverages. -Linebackers blowing coverages. -Vaccaro is not playing with the reckless abandon that made him special and also gave him the concussions. Hopefully he can adjust. -Beat Carolina and win the #2 seed. SF can beat Seattle and the Saints can beat the 49ers in the dome. -WHO DAT!
Cruize 1000 Posts + Join Date: May 2007 Posts: 4,467

LinkBacks (?) LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/62457-9-3-a.html
Posted By	For	Type	Date	Hits
9-3	This thread	Refback	12-02-2013 11:47 PM	10