Re: Jimmy Graham Contract
 

Yeah, I agree. Maybe he should do something on the football field first before cihiming in on the situation. Until then maybe he should keep his piehole shut.

Re: Jimmy Graham Contract
 

Re: Jimmy Graham Contract
 

Per multiple sources, the case against Graham’s position that he should be treated as a receiver for franchise tag purposes included testimony from coach Sean Payton.


Sean Payton testified at Jimmy Graham hearing | ProFootballTalk

Re: Jimmy Graham Contract
 

Uhm,

http://images.sodahead.com/polls/004..._2_xlarge.jpeg

Re: Jimmy Graham Contract
 

Damn i should read slower,i read

That Payton said that Graham should be classed as a receiver

Re: Jimmy Graham Contract
 

Ya'll are confusing the crap outta me.

The article states that Payton said he's a TE, NOT a WR.

Right?

Re: Jimmy Graham Contract
 

I don't care. Offer him more than the highest paid TE no matter what the ruling is. If he doesn't take it fine, let him play under the tag for whatever his position he is ruled to be and use the long term money to get Jordan and Hicks signed next year. That much less restructuring Loomis has to do next year

Re: Jimmy Graham Contract
 

I'll stick up for Graham's ability. And the mismatch it creates.
I'll stick up for Graham's right to try for as much money as he can get.

But I don't believe the Saints should have an open check book with him. It's not that I don't think he deserves a huge payday, but the Saints offense has been based on having too many different options for a defense to account for. So I don't think it makes sense to pay one receiver 12 million + / year.

Re: Jimmy Graham Contract
 

Re: Jimmy Graham Contract
 

This is so frickin' stupid. Graham's earnings will be based solely upon his contract, not the dumbass ruling. Holy crap. These writers have no clue about what is going on and people posting their (the writer's) moronic prose simply perpetuate the idiocy.

My God, people. Get a grip.

Geez.

:whatever: