New Orleans Saints Forums - blackandgold.com

New Orleans Saints Forums - blackandgold.com (https://blackandgold.com/community/)
-   Saints (https://blackandgold.com/saints/)
-   -   Who to cut (cap hits included) (https://blackandgold.com/saints/64032-who-cut-cap-hits-included.html)

Showtime5 01-25-2014 10:09 AM

Re: Who to cut (cap hits included)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Danno (Post 575669)
Two fumbles in 3 years is a fumbling issue?

Yeah I don't seen the fumbling issue there ?

B_Dub_Saint 01-25-2014 11:30 AM

Re: Who to cut (cap hits included)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by alleycat_126 (Post 575665)
It's funny how you place a Saints jersey on a player, and it masks there deficiencies, Mark Ingram takes too long to get going...... And he has a fumbling issue.... that still remains uncorrected... That is the truth. The fact that he is in a Saints Jersey doesn't mask the problem enough for me...

Khiry Robinson..... He looks like the future of the Saints... He needs real help though ( Jeremy Hill, LSU) or ( Andre Williams, Boston College)

Mark Ingram...... He pulls you in just to let you down... Im done. If they decide to keep him it's just gonna be another agonizing up and down season..... Please cut bait and trade him...Again JMHO<<<

Pierre Thomas..... I understand the love, he's earned it, me included. But there comes a time when separation is required, this is that time. What you hear from people who wanna keep him now is " He's the best screen back we have" which is funny to me because his position is running back... For me, It's not that I don't love him.... It's just time!

Travis Cadet.... Seriously.. Did you guys realize he got a playoff carry against Seattle. I swear if you took a second to pop your popcorn you missed it. Why is he on the squad!!

Darren Sproles..... He was used less and less and less..... I believe he never fully healed from all the injuries sustained during the season, I would keep him as the backup to Khiry and ( NEW RUNNING BACK)

I see your point but when you start cutting all of these backs, who do you plan on replacing them with???

Boutte 01-25-2014 01:00 PM

Re: Who to cut (cap hits included)
 
People have been trying to write Thomas off for years. Now it's because he's too old and the proof is that he couldn't run the ball from scrimmage this year. You know like Ingram, Sproles and Robinson. Oh that's right those other guys couldn't run because the O Line wasn't blocking.

Thomas is just old, slow and injury prone. The only thing he's good for is being one of the best receiving threats out of the backfield in the league. If you can't get yards from scrimmage behind a bad O Line you're not any good. Unless you're Mark Ingram or K Rob. (Sproles is worthless too apparently.) Then it's the lines fault.

|Mitch| 01-25-2014 01:20 PM

Re: Who to cut (cap hits included)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Boutte (Post 575695)
Unless you're Mark Ingram or K Rob. (Sproles is worthless too apparently.) Then it's the lines fault.

Apparently our definition of bad is different: Mark Ingram had a 4.9 yards/att stat...

Khiry had a 4.1 yards/att

Thomas had a 3.7 yards/att

Sproles had a 4.2 yards/att

Ingram had a 9.7 yards per catch average and Thomas had a 6.7 yards per catch, so I guess that debunks the best screen back we have opinion

dueceloose 01-25-2014 01:57 PM

Re: Who to cut (cap hits included)
 
How many catches did Thomas get and how many did ingram get? Sure they attempted more to Thomas than Ingram so the smaller sample size would look better than Thomas who's gotten more and had more chances to get stopped.

The Dude 01-25-2014 02:23 PM

Re: Who to cut (cap hits included)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by alleycat_126 (Post 575640)
First off, I don't think anyone in here is eager to let anybody go.... OK .... I take that back..... Everybody in here wants that 11.5 million that Will Smith is worth gone immediately.... Sorry.. I had a point.....

Yeah, nobody wants to see PT gone... I understand his effectiveness. But I long to get away from carrying 5 $%^# Running Backs on the roster when only three are needed....... You wanna know the reason we have a " screen game"? It's mostly because we don't have a run game.... We have become a slave to the screen.... And teams realize it, and they make us pay for it........... bottom line, Can I get some one to come in and run the screen like PT, probably not...... But can I get a truck Alfred Morris type running back from this draft to run the damn ball better so we won't have to rely on the screen so much.... That's more likely....

That is a great point about why we rely on the screen game so often. I have never thought of that.

blackangold 01-25-2014 03:08 PM

Re: Who to cut (cap hits included)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Danno (Post 575591)
So we're about 14 over and we'll need at least 8 million for Graham, so who do you cut?

I know Loomis will likely restructure several players but this kinda gives yo a good indicator who may be asked to restructure or clean out their locker..

Approximated cap savings if cut (hopefully some restructure)...

Cap hit minus dead money = Cap savings if cut
Will Smith - 13,902,451 - 2,352,451 = 11,550,000
Darren Sproles - 4,250,000 - 750,000 = 3,500,000
Jabari Greer - 5,825,000 – 2,650,000 = 3,175,000
Pierre Thomas – 2,900,000 – 0 = 2,900,000
Lance Moore - 5,068,750 - 2,357,500 = 2,711,250
Roman Harper - 5,870,000 - 3,690,000 = 2,180,000
Mark Ingram - 2,359,875 - 973,500 = 1,386,375
Patrick Robinson - 2,804,333 - 1,446,833 = 1,357,500

CUTS:
Smith
Sproles
Thomas
Moore

Restructures:
Harper
Greer

Re-sign
Graham
Bush
Wade
Haralson

Cap Room
$168,546


Still need to sign the drafted players and need a new RT and C. Not going to be an easy year for Loomis. Restructuring Brees is out of the question because we need to save that for next year. Colston could restructure to save 3.05m or we could cut PRob to save 1.3m. Don't expect some major signings this year. Going to be a harsh off-season in my opinion.

You can play with the cap at this site... see how you do.

Salary Cap Calculator - Over the Cap

|Mitch| 01-25-2014 05:54 PM

Re: Who to cut (cap hits included)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by dueceloose (Post 575699)
How many catches did Thomas get and how many did ingram get? Sure they attempted more to Thomas than Ingram so the smaller sample size would look better than Thomas who's gotten more and had more chances to get stopped.

How do you know that with more catches Ingrams yards per catch would go down? He might have had a bigger average with more attempts, no one can be sure until it happens...

ScottF 01-25-2014 05:59 PM

Re: Who to cut (cap hits included)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Danno (Post 575638)
I thought Bunkley played very well, so I don't see him as a cut candidate.

He had 13 tackles, zero sacks. Good for rotational, but not for $5 mill

Danno 01-25-2014 06:05 PM

Re: Who to cut (cap hits included)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ScottF (Post 575727)
He had 13 tackles, zero sacks. Good for rotational, but not for $5 mill

Sack and tackle stats for a DT are as useless as tits on a bull.

Jamessr 01-25-2014 06:15 PM

Re: Who to cut (cap hits included)
 
Thomas, Moore and Sproles is who I'd keep.
I'd get something of value for Ingram, while some people think he's worth it.

|Mitch| 01-25-2014 06:28 PM

Re: Who to cut (cap hits included)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Danno (Post 575730)
Sack and tackle stats for a DT are as useless as tits on a bull.

It's all about collapsing the pocket, which Jenkins and Bunkley both did very well :bng:

jeanpierre 01-25-2014 06:51 PM

Re: Who to cut (cap hits included)
 
Bring back Pierre Thomas (Current Rate), Lance Moore (Slight Adjusted Contract), Mark Ingram (Now that we're finally using him); Sproles, who's been one of my personal fav's, seems like he doesn't have the extra wheel since his injury and being he's 30+, we need to start to rotate younger players at that position...

Also bring back, Patrick Robinson (Finally Getting Some Coaching and then an injury); at the very least let 'em finish the contract and see if current defensive back coaches can get something there...

Brodrick Bunkley, John Jenkins Tandem is great - don't mess with it; and we have versatility where Tyrunn Walker or Akiem Hicks can slide over and help in a pinch...

ScottF 01-25-2014 07:19 PM

Re: Who to cut (cap hits included)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by |Mitch| (Post 575733)
It's all about collapsing the pocket, which Jenkins and Bunkley both did very well :bng:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Danno (Post 575730)
Sack and tackle stats for a DT are as useless as tits on a bull.

In the absence of stats, look at the comparables:
24 DT's had over 40 tackles last year
65 DT's had more tackles than BB
these guys are pressuring the pocket AND coming up with the numbers

BB is the 16th highest paid DT- as we look at every nickel, his name is going to come up

Crusader 01-25-2014 07:50 PM

Re: Who to cut (cap hits included)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ScottF (Post 575738)
In the absence of stats, look at the comparables:
24 DT's had over 40 tackles last year
65 DT's had more tackles than BB
these guys are pressuring the pocket AND coming up with the numbers

BB is the 16th highest paid DT- as we look at every nickel, his name is going to come up

Is that DTs or NTs? There is quite a big difference between being a 5 tech DT and a 0 or 1 tech NT.

Vrillon82 01-26-2014 12:28 AM

Re: Who to cut (cap hits included)
 
only thing about Lance Moore and Meachem is they show up 4 games out of the season.

Kenny Stills gets a pass due to being a rookie.

PT and Sproles are deadly in the screen game, the screen game dont work unless they are decent in the run game which they havent been.

Their needs to be some fixes on the offense otherwise we will start seeing more games like we saw vs Panthers, Jets, and Seahawks.

jeanpierre 01-26-2014 12:43 AM

Re: Who to cut (cap hits included)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ScottF (Post 575738)
In the absence of stats, look at the comparables:
24 DT's had over 40 tackles last year
65 DT's had more tackles than BB
these guys are pressuring the pocket AND coming up with the numbers

BB is the 16th highest paid DT- as we look at every nickel, his name is going to come up



His name would come up simply because of Jenkins showing his ability to start and he costs less...

that said, it would be an incredibly risky chance to let an established 34 Nose Tackle geaux breaking up an affordable, cap friendly, effective rotation at the NT which is rare in today's NFL...

The rotations on the defensive line were the best we've had since the LaRoi Glover gang, maybe even the Dome Patrol days...

On defense, the big problem that has half a solution solved in Vaccaro is to get the complement to shore up the backstop and maybe a playmaking cornerback to pair with the solid pro Keenan Lewis...

But the bigger issue on defense is really at Linebacker where we showed we're most vulnerable when Vaccaro was healthy...

halloween 65 01-26-2014 07:54 AM

Re: Who to cut (cap hits included)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jeanpierre (Post 575775)


His name would come up simply because of Jenkins showing his ability to start and he costs less...

that said, it would be an incredibly risky chance to let an established 34 Nose Tackle geaux breaking up an affordable, cap friendly, effective rotation at the NT which is rare in today's NFL...

The rotations on the defensive line were the best we've had since the LaRoi Glover gang, maybe even the Dome Patrol days...

On defense, the big problem that has half a solution solved in Vaccaro is to get the complement to shore up the backstop and maybe a playmaking cornerback to pair with the solid pro Keenan Lewis...

But the bigger issue on defense is really at Linebacker where we showed we're most vulnerable when Vaccaro was healthy...

JP, If you look at it like I'm looking at it we need another bad a$$ DT up front, one that not only plays the nose in a 3-4 but can play all the front line, keep in mind 6 linemen in a 3-4 that is why I want Hageman in the 1st. As of now we have 5 really good linemen add Hagemen thats 6 and a rookie at that to bring along with Jenkins, Jordon, Hicks and Walker. I would not let Bunkley go this year either. About the lb.'s I wanted to pull the trigger on Van Noy in the 2nd but we need more help on the O line, I did mock this guy Andrew Jackson ILB because we need a thug type in the middle and if him and Rufus could be paired together in the middle over time I do't think we would have to ever worry about the run. Basically in a nut-shell what I would like to see out of our front 7 is to go thug type just like the Dome Patrol was. The pieces are almost there.

TheOak 01-26-2014 09:14 AM

Who to cut (cap hits included)
 
To Showtime5: Danno asked a question and gave a list to choose from. From that you went off like someone was about to steal your wobie, threw out insulting remarks, and to stick with your assumption theme made a few emotional inaccurate claims, and questioned his fandom.

On a scale from 1 to invade Russia in the Winter, how well thought out are your replies?

alleycat_126 01-26-2014 09:39 AM

Re: Who to cut (cap hits included)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Danno (Post 575669)
Two fumbles in 3 years is a fumbling issue?

Our backs rarely if ever put the ball on the turf, and that is all of them... including Mark.... I saw Darren Sproles fumble this season in a game that was over even before he got the carry, im not sure, it might have been his first fumble as a Saint....... and he is over on the sideline berating himself worse than any coach could have...... <<< That is the standard we set. if they hold themselves to that type of standard, a standard that they themselves set...... then yes, it is an issue.....

Danno 01-26-2014 10:28 AM

Re: Who to cut (cap hits included)
 
So two fumbles in three years is a fumbling problem to you?
I just don't know how to reply to that one.

alleycat_126 01-26-2014 10:38 AM

Re: Who to cut (cap hits included)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by B_Dub_Saint (Post 575691)
I see your point but when you start cutting all of these backs, who do you plan on replacing them with???

All of these? Im not suggesting cutting every Saints running back :rofl: To me we ran the ball better when forced to go to a two back rotation with one extra back for injury....

New Back... I think my two names were Jeremy Hill, or Andre Williams
Khiry
Sproles.... Healthy of course......

alleycat_126 01-26-2014 10:46 AM

Re: Who to cut (cap hits included)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Danno (Post 575789)
So two fumbles in three years is a fumbling problem to you?
I just don't know how to reply to that one.

Then don't. I fully explained why I felt that way.... I think I did that well enough for you to understand why I felt that way........ But, if that's not enough for you I could also add the injury history, and the 2 plus years of two yards and a cloud of dust if the first part doesn't help you.... I don't feel he is the future of our back field.... It's an opinion... my opinion, and mine only!!!!

alleycat_126 01-26-2014 11:03 AM

Re: Who to cut (cap hits included)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by blackangold (Post 575704)
CUTS:
Smith
Sproles
Thomas
Moore

Restructures:
Harper
Greer

Re-sign
Graham
Bush
Wade
Haralson

Cap Room
$168,546


Still need to sign the drafted players and need a new RT and C. Not going to be an easy year for Loomis. Restructuring Brees is out of the question because we need to save that for next year. Colston could restructure to save 3.05m or we could cut PRob to save 1.3m. Don't expect some major signings this year. Going to be a harsh off-season in my opinion.

You can play with the cap at this site... see how you do.

Salary Cap Calculator - Over the Cap

Not if you start placing more names on that cut list........ Also a few questions, Why are people so high on Haralson??? Ive seen 3 or 4 people now including my brother who love Haralson off two similar injuries coming back??? why bring Greer back if you draft a starter and you bring back a younger P Rob, and Corey White???

alleycat_126 01-26-2014 11:10 AM

Re: Who to cut (cap hits included)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Danno (Post 575730)
Sack and tackle stats for a DT are as useless as tits on a bull.

Well that Big Boob Bull is worth 5 million, shouldn't we at least consider restructuring it.....

CoreyO 01-26-2014 11:23 AM

Re: Who to cut (cap hits included)
 
I say let sproles go but keep thomas, thomas is very underated. Smith, Jreer, moore should go. Also dont sign haralson he is a great player no doubt but he is too injury prone

blackangold 01-26-2014 11:30 AM

Re: Who to cut (cap hits included)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by alleycat_126 (Post 575793)
Not if you start placing more names on that cut list........ Also a few questions, Why are people so high on Haralson??? Ive seen 3 or 4 people now including my brother who love Haralson off two similar injuries coming back??? why bring Greer back if you draft a starter and you bring back a younger P Rob, and Corey White???

Haralson plays the run very well and comes cheap.

You keep Greer and Harper off of restructures. If they are unwilling then cut them, but you can restructure them to a point where you would only save 500k cutting them... doesn't make sense to do that.

As far as cutting more people; it gets really tight. Everyone in this thread talks about cutting Buckley but if you look at his 6.1m cap number but 5m in dead money cutting him to save 1.1m doesn't make sense.

The more I think about it i don't know if we can afford to keep Graham. If we keep him we might lose 3-4 starters through cuts alone. We have had the #1 offense without Graham in the past, is he really worth it?

NonieT 01-26-2014 12:15 PM

Re: Who to cut (cap hits included)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by blackangold (Post 575796)
Haralson plays the run very well and comes cheap.

You keep Greer and Harper off of restructures. If they are unwilling then cut them, but you can restructure them to a point where you would only save 500k cutting them... doesn't make sense to do that.

As far as cutting more people; it gets really tight. Everyone in this thread talks about cutting Buckley but if you look at his 6.1m cap number but 5m in dead money cutting him to save 1.1m doesn't make sense.

The more I think about it i don't know if we can afford to keep Graham. If we keep him we might lose 3-4 starters through cuts alone. We have had the #1 offense without Graham in the past, is he really worth it?

YES!!!

K Major 01-26-2014 03:12 PM

Re: Who to cut (cap hits included)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by alleycat_126 (Post 575790)

New Back... I think my two names were Jeremy Hill, or Andre Williams
Khiry
Sproles.... Healthy of course......


Zip Jeremy Hill. I don't think Payton would want to waste time developing this kid when we have Ingram, Khiry etc. Plus JH off the field issues are still a concern.

TheOak 01-26-2014 03:21 PM

Re: Who to cut (cap hits included)
 
Cutting:

1. You can cut when a player is depth but doesn't play.

2. You can cut when there is no dead money associated.

3. You can cut when cap hit is higher than dead money hit..... AND you can find better talent for no more than the difference.


Anything other that will hurt.

You don't cut a 5M cap hit with 4.5M dead money and replace with equal talent. WTF is the gain?

FinSaint 01-26-2014 03:23 PM

Re: Who to cut (cap hits included)
 
Honestly, I could see the Saints being just fine with all of the suggested individuals gone, but I would like to see at least Ingram and either Sproles or Thomas back... not necessarily both. While a large staple of backs is nice, I'd like to see the Saints highlight fewer of them during a single game, so that they'd be able to get into the running game a bit better - I think this especially holds true for Ingram.

Moore is another one I'd like to see back, but I'm not entirely sure if it's more from an emotional standpoint than production versus investment. A lot depends on Toon as well, if he can actually become a contributing part of this offense then maybe Stills could take up Moore's spot, but again that's an unknown while Moore is at this point of his career a well known commodity.

I feel like Greer's time with the Saints is done, while he is/was still a great coverage CB, he has started to lack the physicality to keep up with many of the younger more physical receivers around. Add that to the effect that this latest injury may have on his long-term conditioning, and the Saints might be better of giving his roster spot to a younger player. I'd like to see Robinson given (yet) another chance to show his worth, but if the staff thinks it's time to part with him I can certainly understand the logic behind that decision as well.

And definitely keep Bunkley around - if his contract can be massaged a bit all the better, but even with the terms in place I think he is a keeper.

jeanpierre 01-26-2014 08:56 PM

Re: Who to cut (cap hits included)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by halloween 65 (Post 575783)
JP, If you look at it like I'm looking at it we need another bad a$$ DT up front, one that not only plays the nose in a 3-4 but can play all the front line, keep in mind 6 linemen in a 3-4 that is why I want Hageman in the 1st. As of now we have 5 really good linemen add Hagemen thats 6 and a rookie at that to bring along with Jenkins, Jordon, Hicks and Walker. I would not let Bunkley go this year either. About the lb.'s I wanted to pull the trigger on Van Noy in the 2nd but we need more help on the O line, I did mock this guy Andrew Jackson ILB because we need a thug type in the middle and if him and Rufus could be paired together in the middle over time I do't think we would have to ever worry about the run. Basically in a nut-shell what I would like to see out of our front 7 is to go thug type just like the Dome Patrol was. The pieces are almost there.

Even if we didn't have a ~20mil quarterback and other high paid veterans, you have to allocate a pie to 53 men on a roster...

You have to pick your spots...

When you look at our defensive line as a 34 front, we're two deep and very effective at each position...

Tom Johnson is a FA and will probably be replaced with an inexpensive young veteran, or an Undrafted Rookie Free Agent; though I do like the NT from Pitt as well as

That's the NFL today; finding the right formula within the salary cap budget...

We had a special year despite alot of dead money (Injured Reserve et al)...

But the question posed is "Who to cut (cap hits included)?" has mostly been answered with those that were on IR this past season understand they've been replaced already with younger, faster, stronger players...

jeanpierre 01-26-2014 09:04 PM

Re: Who to cut (cap hits included)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by FinSaint (Post 575809)
Honestly, I could see the Saints being just fine with all of the suggested individuals gone, but I would like to see at least Ingram and either Sproles or Thomas back... not necessarily both. While a large staple of backs is nice, I'd like to see the Saints highlight fewer of them during a single game, so that they'd be able to get into the running game a bit better - I think this especially holds true for Ingram.


Agree, not sure we need "wholesale" change; maintain continuity...

With maybe the exception on the offensive line...

Not sure we don't already "package" or "feature" certain running backs from week to week depending on opponent...

Expect that either Sproles or Thomas to be released from their respective contracts; both a Thomas and Sproles fan, but Sproles' size, being 30+, and much slower than two years ago, plus the knee injury - he's most vulnerable...

Thomas still has the power and is the most effective running the screen (have posted ad nauseum); but Ingram is his biggest factor in returning; Ingram could be extended with his salary slot and Thomas will turn 30 this season...

blackangold 01-26-2014 10:14 PM

Re: Who to cut (cap hits included)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jeanpierre (Post 575855)

Agree, not sure we need "wholesale" change; maintain continuity...

With maybe the exception on the offensive line...

Not sure we don't already "package" or "feature" certain running backs from week to week depending on opponent...

Expect that either Sproles or Thomas to be released from their respective contracts; both a Thomas and Sproles fan, but Sproles' size, being 30+, and much slower than two years ago, plus the knee injury - he's most vulnerable...

Thomas still has the power and is the most effective running the screen (have posted ad nauseum); but Ingram is his biggest factor in returning; Ingram could be extended with his salary slot and Thomas will turn 30 this season...

Thomas is most likely to be cut because he a no dwad money at all...

alleycat_126 01-26-2014 11:16 PM

Re: Who to cut (cap hits included)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by blackangold (Post 575796)
Haralson plays the run very well and comes cheap.

Not as cheap as a not injury prone Rookie... He's holding a spot for somebody who could be producing, much like Travis Cadet.

Quote:

You keep Greer and Harper off of restructures.
Bush, and Vaccaro are going to be the starting safeties going into next season. You will draft another FS... You don't need Roman Harper.... The same can be said for Greer... He has had an admirable Saints career. Done more than anyone could have asked. But he wasn't a #1 corner when Tracy Porter left, and he is not a #2 corner now after the injury on the wrong side of 30. Patrick Robinson is younger, and Corey White is gonna get better by going back to slot duty... LET GO!!!!!

Quote:

As far as cutting more people; it gets really tight. What's tight about replacing people who you may not need, or are not producing.... and getting cheaper options.....



The more I think about it i don't know if we can afford to keep Graham. If we keep him we might lose 3-4 starters through cuts alone. We have had the #1 offense without Graham in the past, is he really worth it?
YES, YES, AND AGAIN YES.... worth every red ginger nickel.... We have been reaping off of him since that 3rd round selection...

hagan714 01-27-2014 07:39 AM

Re: Who to cut (cap hits included)
 
the cap is a mess. super bowl hang over contracts are killing us.

Mickey has a plan i hope

draft is the best way to address a cap issue.

so sit back and watch and see what happens

TheOak 01-27-2014 08:11 AM

Re: Who to cut (cap hits included)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by hagan714 (Post 575875)
the cap is a mess. super bowl hang over contracts are killing us.

Mickey has a plan i hope

draft is the best way to address a cap issue.

so sit back and watch and see what happens

No sir. We do not have anyone on a big contract due to the SB. Evans and Brees are about it and they were All-Pro, Pro-Bowl, MVPs, etc... Smiths huge contract was from 2008.

We only have 9-10 players that were even on that 2009 team.

Danno 01-27-2014 08:25 AM

Re: Who to cut (cap hits included)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheOak (Post 575877)
No sir. We do not have anyone on a big contract due to the SB. Evans and Brees are about it and they were All-Pro, Pro-Bowl, MVPs, etc... Smiths huge contract was from 2008.

We only have 9-10 players that were even on that 2009 team.

Thats true, but he did nail it on the draft comment. The best way to bring that cap down is to start hitting on draft picks.

We knocked it out of the ball park (and halfway across the parking lot)
in 2013. Another year or two like that and we'll be sitting pretty cap wise, even with Drews big contract.

BTW, Drew is currently the 4th highest paid QB in the league. With Newton, Wilson, Kaeppernick contracts coming up soon he'll probably drop out of the top 5. His contract amount isn't all that absurd.

TheOak 01-27-2014 08:59 AM

Re: Who to cut (cap hits included)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Danno (Post 575880)
Thats true, but he did nail it on the draft comment. The best way to bring that cap down is to start hitting on draft picks.

We knocked it out of the ball park (and halfway across the parking lot)
in 2013. Another year or two like that and we'll be sitting pretty cap wise, even with Drews big contract.

BTW, Drew is currently the 4th highest paid QB in the league. With Newton, Wilson, Kaeppernick contracts coming up soon he'll probably drop out of the top 5. His contract amount isn't all that absurd.


Its a catch-22 Danno. Too many draft homeruns will balloon on you especially when you make it to a SB or NFCCG. FAs are less likely to balloon on you as their market values have been pretty much set after their rookie contract.

Your examples on Kaep and Wilson prove my point which leaves a dilemma.

A. You get a good blend and maintain some retention.

B. You flood the team with youth and every three years if you are successful have to deal with high turnover because you cant fit all the outstanding players under your cap.

Its a good problem to have but still a problem none the less. In my opinion the solution is not an either, or; but a blend. The short term solution typically looks fantastic until you look at the effect long term.

Danno 01-27-2014 09:03 AM

Re: Who to cut (cap hits included)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheOak (Post 575883)
Its a catch-22 Danno. Too many draft homeruns will balloon on you especially when you make it to a SB or NFCCG. FAs are less likely to balloon on you as their market values have been pretty much set after their rookie contract.

Your examples on Kaep and Wilson prove my point which leaves a dilemma.

A. You get a good blend and maintain some retention.

B. You flood the team with youth and every three years if you are successful have to deal with high turnover because you cant fit all the outstanding players under your cap.

Its a good problem to have but still a problem none the less. In my opinion the solution is not an either, or; but a blend. The short term solution typically looks fantastic until you look at the effect long term.

Good points, and its also why every team needs solid role players. Role players won't break the bank and help maintain continuity year to year. You can't afford to have an all-pro at every position.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:50 PM.


Copyright 1997 - 2020 - BlackandGold.com