|
|||||||
Loomis: No deadline for Graham deal
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; Originally Posted by Utah_Saint I didn't miss it. As a matter of fact, that's the whole point. Graham lined up as a wide out more than any of those players. Why would they be any more of a wideout than ...
9Likes|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
04-10-2014, 02:20 PM
|
#8 |
|
10000 POST CLUB
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Cypress Tx.
Posts: 19,051
|
Re: Loomis: No deadline for Graham deal
Originally Posted by Utah_Saint
You are still missing it. "Slot Receiver" is not a Wide Receiver owned role. He didn't line up as a Wide Receiver, he lined up as a slot... 
Just because traditionally a Wide Receiver lines up in the slot doesn't make it a Wide Receiver position... Just line a kick returner is not a Wide Receiver even though that role is normally played by Wide Receivers. 2013 NFL Player Returning Stats - National Football League - ESPN In the strict language of the CBA there is no such position as a "wide out" or a "slot receiver". BTW Jimmy Graham has the right to challenge and has chosen not to. |
|
It's not what you look at that matters, it's what you see. ~ Henry David Thoreau
Last edited by TheOak; 04-10-2014 at 02:25 PM.. |
|
|
Threaded Mode
|
|
LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/65424-loomis-no-deadline-graham-deal.html
|
||||
| Posted By | For | Type | Date | Hits |
| Loomis: No deadline for Graham deal | This thread | Refback | 04-10-2014 10:15 AM | 5 |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:21 PM.
