New Orleans Saints Forums - blackandgold.com
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

New Orleans Saints Forums - blackandgold.com (https://blackandgold.com/community/)
-   Saints (https://blackandgold.com/saints/)
-   -   SportsNOLA.com NFL takes back $21,000 fine on safety Rafael Bush following appeal (https://blackandgold.com/saints/65427-nfl-takes-back-21-000-fine-safety-rafael-bush-following-appeal.html)

jnormand 04-10-2014 02:44 PM
Re: NFL takes back $21,000 fine on safety Rafael Bush following appeal
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheOak (Post 588068)
Seems they caught the error, I copied and pasted the headline with out edit. The URL from the OP has "takes back" as well LOL!

Seems like an editor finally got around to reading it. :bng:
So I wasn't the only one who thought the title was weird. Lol. Thanks Oak.

TheOak 04-10-2014 02:48 PM
Re: NFL takes back $21,000 fine on safety Rafael Bush following appeal
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by jnormand (Post 588124)
So I wasn't the only one who thought the title was weird. Lol. Thanks Oak.

When Bush said "I can have my 21 back".... It was clear to me..

I do have the benefit of posting a lot of articles and titles are often misleading.

AsylumGuido 04-10-2014 02:58 PM
Re: NFL takes back $21,000 fine on safety Rafael Bush following appeal
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheOak (Post 588127)
When Bush said "I can have my 21 back".... It was clear to me..

I do have the benefit of posting a lot of articles and titles are often misleading.
Also, titles, or headlines, are seldom written by the person that pens the article. That in itself leads to quite a bit of misleading leads. (see that, three leads in one sentence?)

TheOak 04-10-2014 03:41 PM
Re: NFL takes back $21,000 fine on safety Rafael Bush following appeal
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by AsylumGuido (Post 588131)
Also, titles, or headlines, are seldom written by the person that pens the article. That in itself leads to quite a bit of misleading leads. (see that, three leads in one sentence?)

There, their, they're..... Everything will be fine. ;)

Rugby Saint II 04-10-2014 05:44 PM
Re: NFL takes back $21,000 fine on safety Rafael Bush following appeal
 
Does anybody else wish that hit had been on Godhell?

st thomas 04-10-2014 08:52 PM
Re: NFL takes back $21,000 fine on safety Rafael Bush following appeal
 
that's why I didn't want to lose that guy bush. he will make a few receivers respect his play. that dude can bring it.

hennr 04-10-2014 09:11 PM
Re: NFL takes back $21,000 fine on safety Rafael Bush following appeal
 
The bad call from Ref was 3 points for sea ckens.The hit was a statement to sea cluckens the saints came to play hard.old Rogggerr could not have hated saints come out on top ,therefore the bad call an resulting 3 points.:bng::lolup:

Danno 04-10-2014 09:14 PM
Re: NFL takes back $21,000 fine on safety Rafael Bush following appeal
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by hennr (Post 588215)
The bad call from Ref was 3 points for sea ckens.The hit was a statement to sea cluckens the saints came to play hard.old Rogggerr could not have hated saints come out on call therefore the bad call an resulting 3 points.:bng::lolup:
WHAT?

nola_swammi 04-10-2014 09:17 PM
Re: NFL takes back $21,000 fine on safety Rafael Bush following appeal
 
that clearly was a legal hit; I was telling my friends the blow was not to his head. The argument is and always will be defining a defenseless player



TheOak 04-11-2014 07:03 AM
Re: NFL takes back $21,000 fine on safety Rafael Bush following appeal
 
I cant begin to count the times that Colston has been hit just like that with no flag.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:17 AM.
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page


Copyright 1997 - 2020 - BlackandGold.com