Brooks

JKool · 12-03-2004, 01:22 PM

Letting Delhomme go was a mistake. However, at some point a coach needs to resolve the QB battle one way or the other. QB is one of those positions where competition can be a mixed blessing. WRs and OL need to work with the same guy most of the time - in order build timing and confidence. Switching back and forth can be a problem.

That said, I imagine that WhoDat believe that Delhomme would have won the battle and we\'d have Delhomme instead of Brooks. Right now, I\'m indifferent to that. Last year I may have said something different.

Danno, good assessment.

BlackandBlue · 12-03-2004, 01:26 PM

Having him in completely changes the look of the D and has helped improve their run defense dramitically! LOL

If I take a ****, and it\'s nice and hard, it\'s an upgrade from diarrhea- but it\'s still ****

Danno · 12-03-2004, 01:30 PM

How many people would like to still have Delhomme and/or O\'Sullivan right now?

Imagine that QB battle! Brooks, Delhomme, Bouman, O\'Sullivan.

Kinda like 2000, when we had Jeff Blake, Brooks, Delhomme and Bulger.
Why can\'t we have the same eye for DT\'s or LB\'s?

I will admit I\'d love to have JT and Jake right now to battle Brooks. I don\'t think Boumann and Klingsbury are gonna push him very hard.

But having JT would mean no McKenzie.

BlackandBlue · 12-03-2004, 01:34 PM

I don\'t think our receivers complimented O\'Sullivan, his arm wasn\'t as strong as some others we\'ve had here.
I do have the occasional dream at night of Bulger dropping bombs to Horn and Stallworth, though.

saintswhodi · 12-03-2004, 02:22 PM

I do have the occasional dream at night of Bulger

Just some creative editing I found funny BNB.

xrotflmao:

TheJudge · 12-03-2004, 05:46 PM

haslett just knew that brooks would be his savior and make him an in house name but it flopped on hi... the reason they did not play delhomme when brooks was hurt a couple years ago is because they didnt want there to be a QB controversy and so he let us drift out of the playoffs buy playing a hurt brooks.... haslett put all his egss in his basket with brooks, and his eggs are now scrambled...

spkb25 · 12-03-2004, 06:24 PM

im not so sure of bulger personally. i dont think he is all thatv geart. maybe thats just me. i think hes a starter in this league but put him on this team imm not sure he does much better then brooks.
to judge im not sure about has with all his eggs in one basket. im not disagreeing im just not sure. but i would say it bothered me then and it bothers me now that we should have replaced brooks the last couple of games that season because he was hurt. and why he didnt i dont know. so maybe you are right. he put all his eggs in one basket

BlackandBlue · 12-03-2004, 07:20 PM

Bulger is in a bad situation- his o-line gives him about as much protection as a condom from a truck stop quarter machine, and his coach forgot that he has a future hall of famer in the backfield.

[Edited on 4/12/2004 by BlackandBlue]

spkb25 · 12-03-2004, 09:36 PM

well i think if u have watched jackson he seems a good replacement. and as far as his coach thats why he is so successful. as far as their o line is ours much better?

WhoDat · 12-04-2004, 09:16 AM

6 Pages! Woo! Let\'s see if we can\'t keep this going until the end of the season.

That said, I imagine that WhoDat believe that Delhomme would have won the battle and we\'d have Delhomme instead of Brooks.

Assume away... I doubt anyone would have beaten AB out this year, not with this coaching staff. Even with a new one AB SHOULD win - the guy\'s been a starter for almost 5 years now. But if we had Delhomme, O\'Sullivan, Bulger, Blake, etc. right now we\'d have options. Bouman and Klingsbury or whoever don\'t give us a lot of options.

12-03-2004, 01:22 PM	#151
JKool 1000 Posts + Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: Madison, WI Posts: 2,423	Brooks Letting Delhomme go was a mistake. However, at some point a coach needs to resolve the QB battle one way or the other. QB is one of those positions where competition can be a mixed blessing. WRs and OL need to work with the same guy most of the time - in order build timing and confidence. Switching back and forth can be a problem. That said, I imagine that WhoDat believe that Delhomme would have won the battle and we\'d have Delhomme instead of Brooks. Right now, I\'m indifferent to that. Last year I may have said something different. Danno, good assessment.
	"... I was beating them with my eyes the whole game..." - Aaron Brooks

12-03-2004, 01:26 PM	#152
BlackandBlue Kinder, gentler Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: dirty south Posts: 3,889	Brooks Having him in completely changes the look of the D and has helped improve their run defense dramitically! LOL If I take a **, and it\'s nice and hard, it\'s an upgrade from diarrhea- but it\'s still **

12-03-2004, 01:30 PM	#153
Danno Truth Addict Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Spanish Fort, AL (via NO and B/R) Posts: 24,725	Brooks How many people would like to still have Delhomme and/or O\'Sullivan right now? Imagine that QB battle! Brooks, Delhomme, Bouman, O\'Sullivan. Kinda like 2000, when we had Jeff Blake, Brooks, Delhomme and Bulger. Why can\'t we have the same eye for DT\'s or LB\'s? I will admit I\'d love to have JT and Jake right now to battle Brooks. I don\'t think Boumann and Klingsbury are gonna push him very hard. But having JT would mean no McKenzie.

12-03-2004, 01:34 PM	#154
BlackandBlue Kinder, gentler Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: dirty south Posts: 3,889	Brooks I don\'t think our receivers complimented O\'Sullivan, his arm wasn\'t as strong as some others we\'ve had here. I do have the occasional dream at night of Bulger dropping bombs to Horn and Stallworth, though.

12-03-2004, 02:22 PM	#155
saintswhodi 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: San Antonio, TX Posts: 6,941	Brooks I do have the occasional dream at night of Bulger Just some creative editing I found funny BNB. xrotflmao:

Latest Blogs
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey

12-03-2004, 05:46 PM	#156
TheJudge 100th Post Join Date: Oct 2004 Posts: 100	Brooks haslett just knew that brooks would be his savior and make him an in house name but it flopped on hi... the reason they did not play delhomme when brooks was hurt a couple years ago is because they didnt want there to be a QB controversy and so he let us drift out of the playoffs buy playing a hurt brooks.... haslett put all his egss in his basket with brooks, and his eggs are now scrambled...
TheJudge 100th Post Join Date: Oct 2004 Posts: 100

12-03-2004, 06:24 PM	#157
spkb25 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Baltimore, MD Posts: 13,101	Brooks im not so sure of bulger personally. i dont think he is all thatv geart. maybe thats just me. i think hes a starter in this league but put him on this team imm not sure he does much better then brooks. to judge im not sure about has with all his eggs in one basket. im not disagreeing im just not sure. but i would say it bothered me then and it bothers me now that we should have replaced brooks the last couple of games that season because he was hurt. and why he didnt i dont know. so maybe you are right. he put all his eggs in one basket
	Your team stinks

12-03-2004, 07:20 PM	#158
BlackandBlue Kinder, gentler Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: dirty south Posts: 3,889	Brooks Bulger is in a bad situation- his o-line gives him about as much protection as a condom from a truck stop quarter machine, and his coach forgot that he has a future hall of famer in the backfield. [Edited on 4/12/2004 by BlackandBlue]

12-03-2004, 09:36 PM	#159
spkb25 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Baltimore, MD Posts: 13,101	Brooks well i think if u have watched jackson he seems a good replacement. and as far as his coach thats why he is so successful. as far as their o line is ours much better?

12-04-2004, 09:16 AM	#160
WhoDat 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Sep 2002 Posts: 5,631	Brooks 6 Pages! Woo! Let\'s see if we can\'t keep this going until the end of the season. That said, I imagine that WhoDat believe that Delhomme would have won the battle and we\'d have Delhomme instead of Brooks. Assume away... I doubt anyone would have beaten AB out this year, not with this coaching staff. Even with a new one AB SHOULD win - the guy\'s been a starter for almost 5 years now. But if we had Delhomme, O\'Sullivan, Bulger, Blake, etc. right now we\'d have options. Bouman and Klingsbury or whoever don\'t give us a lot of options.
WhoDat 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Sep 2002 Posts: 5,631