New Orleans Saints Forums - blackandgold.com

New Orleans Saints Forums - blackandgold.com (https://blackandgold.com/community/)
-   Saints (https://blackandgold.com/saints/)
-   -   Result of the Graham Hearing (https://blackandgold.com/saints/66561-result-graham-hearing.html)

ScottF 06-25-2014 06:53 PM

Re: Result of the Graham Hearing
 
following the theme of the OP & Danno, here's the latest on JG:

NFL Trade Rumors: Jimmy Graham Heading to Cleveland Browns, Arbitration Ruling Sends Saints into Full-on Rebuild | Gospelherald.com

gotta love the headline
Apparently if lose Jimmy we are going to need to rebuild. Or we could just use of our other 7 offensive toys

lee909 06-25-2014 07:02 PM

Re: Result of the Graham Hearing
 
1+1 is 436324644357823940263


That could well be up there as the dumbest article of the year.


He has an outstanding case that he will probably win.
According to ESPN.com, Graham's snaps were divided the following way:
45 percent as a slot receiver,
33 percent as an in-line tight end
22 percent as a wide receiver.

So Graham set up as a TE in 78% of snaps then

Utah_Saint 06-25-2014 11:26 PM

Re: Result of the Graham Hearing
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by lee909 (Post 598150)
1+1 is 436324644357823940263


That could well be up there as the dumbest article of the year.


He has an outstanding case that he will probably win.
According to ESPN.com, Graham's snaps were divided the following way:
45 percent as a slot receiver,
33 percent as an in-line tight end
22 percent as a wide receiver.

So Graham set up as a TE in 78% of snaps then

Where is the Slot defined as a TE position?

If that's the case, then Eddie Royal, Wes Welker, Tavon Austin, Dexter McCluster, Jericho Cotchery should all be designated TEs too. Jimmy Graham lined up wide out more often than any of them.

lee909 06-25-2014 11:50 PM

Re: Result of the Graham Hearing
 
There is no such position as a slot receiver.


The "Slot Receiver" is anyone lining up wide of the line and inside of the WR.
RB/TE and WR can receive in what is regarded as the slot.

Look at the link below show Sproles lining up in the 'slot' and then Graham doing the same. Neither are WR but lining up a few yards off the traditional position that a TE/RB would line up to get them a clean go
The wording and tags need changed but that should have no impact on this case as it stands.

Know the Score, Week 5: Who dat gonna beat dem Saints? - SBNation.com

Beastmode 06-25-2014 11:53 PM

Re: Result of the Graham Hearing
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by lee909 (Post 598150)
1+1 is 436324644357823940263


That could well be up there as the dumbest article of the year.


He has an outstanding case that he will probably win.
According to ESPN.com, Graham's snaps were divided the following way:
45 percent as a slot receiver,
33 percent as an in-line tight end
22 percent as a wide receiver.

So Graham set up as a TE in 78% of snaps then


If I'm doing a job and 78% of the time I'm doing the job of a higher salary employee well then hello desk audit! Time for me to get paid.

I could see this forcing the NFL to create more defined roles of players outlined in contracts, like really defined year to year. Sproles could have been a WR as well.

Utah_Saint 06-26-2014 12:14 AM

Re: Result of the Graham Hearing
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by lee909 (Post 598167)
There is no such position as a slot receiver.


The "Slot Receiver" is anyone lining up wide of the line and inside of the WR.
RB/TE and WR can receive in what is regarded as the slot.

Look at the link below show Sproles lining up in the 'slot' and then Graham doing the same. Neither are WR but lining up a few yards off the traditional position that a TE/RB would line up to get them a clean go
The wording and tags need changed but that should have no impact on this case as it stands.

Know the Score, Week 5: Who dat gonna beat dem Saints? - SBNation.com

I'm confused (it happens a lot more than I care to admit) how can you add the slot snaps to the TE position but in the next post explain that slot doesn't define a position?

Utah_Saint 06-26-2014 12:23 AM

Re: Result of the Graham Hearing
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Beastmode (Post 598168)
If I'm doing a job and 78% of the time I'm doing the job of a higher salary employee well then hello desk audit! Time for me to get paid.

I could see this forcing the NFL to create more defined roles of players outlined in contracts, like really defined year to year. Sproles could have been a WR as well.

IF Sproles (or any running back) lined up in a receivers position (slot or wide) more than in the backfield and IF he were being franchised as a RB, you can bet dollars to donuts he'd appeal a RB designation, it's a difference of 2.5 million a year. That's a heck of a negotiating position. He'd be crazy if he didn't.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:06 PM.


Copyright 1997 - 2020 - BlackandGold.com