Before you go Jim....

Tobias-Reiper · 12-05-2004, 08:05 PM

that just isnt true about has winning with ditkas guys. there were at most 23 guys still on the team from the ditka erra. none of which was a qb. i pulled up the roster from both years.
but let me just somehow give you the benefit of the doubt and say that has did win with ditkas guys. well then my friend your saying that has is a better coach then ditka because he won more then ditka did with teh same talent. either way your argument fails big time.
i think has has to go also. but i also think we need a major overhaul. new players and new coaches. some of our guys could stay. but most have to go

...check the o-line and d-line in those rosters... the trenches were Ditka\'s (except Roaf)..
DB\'s? Ditka\'s...

if the 2000 Saints had an o-line remotely resembling any of the lines fielded afterwards, no way the Saints go 10-6 in 2000.

12-05-2004, 08:05 PM	#26
Tobias-Reiper Merces Letifer Join Date: Dec 2004 Posts: 4,161	Before you go Jim.... that just isnt true about has winning with ditkas guys. there were at most 23 guys still on the team from the ditka erra. none of which was a qb. i pulled up the roster from both years. but let me just somehow give you the benefit of the doubt and say that has did win with ditkas guys. well then my friend your saying that has is a better coach then ditka because he won more then ditka did with teh same talent. either way your argument fails big time. i think has has to go also. but i also think we need a major overhaul. new players and new coaches. some of our guys could stay. but most have to go ...check the o-line and d-line in those rosters... the trenches were Ditka\'s (except Roaf).. DB\'s? Ditka\'s... if the 2000 Saints had an o-line remotely resembling any of the lines fielded afterwards, no way the Saints go 10-6 in 2000.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode