![]() |
Argument against this?
If we package our second round pick with 13 we could move to 6, by still having 31 that effectively still gives us a second round selection with 2 third rounders to come. I don't think this is a bad scenario at all.
|
Re: Argument against this?
Quote:
|
Re: Argument against this?
Quote:
You end up with top 6 pick, and still have 3 more in first 3. No?? |
Re: Argument against this?
Quote:
|
Re: Argument against this?
I like the Idea.
There are two guys I really want, and I don't think either will be there at 13. Beasley and Shelton. If we move up and give up our 2nd rounder for one of those guys ill be happy about it. |
Re: Argument against this?
We have too much talent in the first two rounds to trade a pick away.......but if I did it would be for Shelton.
|
Re: Argument against this?
Quote:
|
Re: Argument against this?
Quote:
|
Re: Argument against this?
I've gone back and forth on this.
But have to say; only losing one of our 2nd round picks to grab a game-changer is tempting. |
Re: Argument against this?
The Saints have been trading up and losing picks, but it really hasn't worked. Now they find themselves in a position where they need immediate help at several positions. With three picks in the first 44 they have the chance to fill a few of those needs with quality starters. If the Saints were one star player away from the Superbowl it would be different, but they are not. With 9 picks they are set up to make significant improvement with young players. Brees time is limited, the Saints can't afford to blow another draft.
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:37 PM. |
Copyright 1997 - 2020 - BlackandGold.com