|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; If we package our second round pick with 13 we could move to 6, by still having 31 that effectively still gives us a second round selection with 2 third rounders to come. I don't think this is a bad ...
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
04-12-2015, 02:14 PM | #1 |
10000 POST CLUB
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 13,097
|
Argument against this?
If we package our second round pick with 13 we could move to 6, by still having 31 that effectively still gives us a second round selection with 2 third rounders to come. I don't think this is a bad scenario at all.
|
Latest Blogs | |
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn
Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey
CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey |
04-12-2015, 02:36 PM | #2 |
500th Post
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 921
|
Re: Argument against this?
I do. Most of the talent is in rounds 2- the top of 5. We don't need to move it. Stay put and take BPA or move down and get more picks.
|
04-12-2015, 03:01 PM | #3 |
10000 POST CLUB
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 13,097
|
Re: Argument against this?
Originally Posted by NonieT
GOT YA, FROM WHAT I have read is there about 10 maybe 12 top guys and then a ton of guys with exactly the same talent level. So to me being outside that spot where the top talent is you trade up, and then you still have 2 3rds, and 31.
You end up with top 6 pick, and still have 3 more in first 3. No?? |
04-12-2015, 03:09 PM | #4 |
500th Post
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 921
|
Re: Argument against this?
Originally Posted by spkb25
NO, NO, & NO!!!!!!!! Stay put.
|
04-12-2015, 03:09 PM | #5 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 3,422
|
Re: Argument against this?
I like the Idea.
There are two guys I really want, and I don't think either will be there at 13. Beasley and Shelton. If we move up and give up our 2nd rounder for one of those guys ill be happy about it. |
04-12-2015, 04:17 PM | #6 |
Bounty Money $$$
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: 5800 Airline Dr. Metairie, LA.
Posts: 24,052
|
Re: Argument against this?
We have too much talent in the first two rounds to trade a pick away.......but if I did it would be for Shelton.
|
04-12-2015, 04:19 PM | #7 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Broussard,La.
Posts: 1,264
|
Re: Argument against this?
I can legitimately see Loomis doing just that. Weren't they in talks with Washington about trading up? I don't think that would be a bad idea,but I would really like to see them trade our 13 and a player so we can keep our second....that would be nice.
|
04-12-2015, 04:50 PM | #8 |
500th Post
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 921
|
Re: Argument against this?
|
04-12-2015, 05:27 PM | #10 |
100th Post
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 180
|
Re: Argument against this?
The Saints have been trading up and losing picks, but it really hasn't worked. Now they find themselves in a position where they need immediate help at several positions. With three picks in the first 44 they have the chance to fill a few of those needs with quality starters. If the Saints were one star player away from the Superbowl it would be different, but they are not. With 9 picks they are set up to make significant improvement with young players. Brees time is limited, the Saints can't afford to blow another draft.
|
|
|
LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/71938-argument-against.html
|
||||
Posted By | For | Type | Date | Hits |
The Latest New Orleans Saints News | SportSpyder | This thread | Refback | 04-12-2015 02:40 PM | 6 |
Argument against this? | This thread | Refback | 04-12-2015 02:18 PM | 11 |