![]() |
Re: Saints 23, Tampa 20
we only beat tampa because they laid down, that's what is worst about the entire thing. Tampa intentionally lost, had they not we wouldn't have won that game
|
Re: Saints 23, Tampa 20
Quote:
|
Re: Saints 23, Tampa 20
Quote:
|
Re: Saints 23, Tampa 20
We might didn't lose by points but the saints lost that game. The Bucs didn't want to win that game, they pulled their starters in the second half and when it seems they were gonna still win they pulled their second string offensive lineman and put a player in with less than 5 game day experience which allowed Galette to get a safety.
If people on here say we should never lay down and lose, I'll say i will never would want to see us win a meaningless game like that. http://blackandgold.com/saints/70348...rs-23-a-2.html |
Re: Saints 23, Tampa 20
Maybe a TD or sack enables a veteran to hit an earmark or make the PB but it doesn't happen because they are benched for backups. I know teams bench starters if they are in the Playoffs but that is a much different situation. Just playing devil's advocate here, something to think about if you are a veteran on a bad team. I would not want to lose a big incentive over a draft pick. I would be quite upset about it and would want to be traded if I missed it knowing I could have likely achieved it in two benched quarters.
|
Re: Saints 23, Tampa 20
Lying down is for QUITTERS, I don't care if TB "gave" the Saints that game. A win is a win in the NFL
|
Re: Saints 23, Tampa 20
|
Re: Saints 23, Tampa 20
Quote:
|
Re: Saints 23, Tampa 20
Quote:
Arizona at their house can be a biotch though, :neutral:. |
Re: Saints 23, Tampa 20
LOL What IF, What IF, What IF? LOL
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:43 PM. |
Copyright 1997 - 2020 - BlackandGold.com