|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; Originally Posted by dizzle88 Never sign an injured played for 56 million. Then we wouldn't have signed Brees in 2006. $60M But yes, I agree with you and even Brees was a HUGE gamble back then. Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A ...
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Site Donor
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 2,589
|
Re: A WASTE OF MONEY? It's Byrd Or Bust For the Saints Going Forward
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
10000 POST CLUB
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 11,534
|
Re: A WASTE OF MONEY? It's Byrd Or Bust For the Saints Going Forward
Originally Posted by 44Champs
Haha completely slipped my mind to be fair! Lol![]()
I guess in 2006 we really didn't have anything to lose by signing him, we were fresh off a 3 win season so expectations weren't sky high By underachieving on defense, all we are doing is wasting the years that Brees still has. |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/73394-waste-money-its-byrd-bust-saints-going-forward.html
|
||||
Posted By | For | Type | Date | Hits |
The Latest New Orleans Saints News | SportSpyder | This thread | Refback | 08-02-2015 12:45 PM | 1 |
A WASTE OF MONEY? It's Byrd Or Bust For the Saints Going Forward | This thread | Refback | 08-02-2015 11:38 AM | 8 |
The Latest New Orleans Saints News | SportSpyder | This thread | Refback | 08-02-2015 11:11 AM | 10 |