Saintjoe1

OK, this discussion is about Bledsoe and I am discussing Aaron in a peripheral way with the assumption that he will be back as our QB next year. Any discussion about whether he should be or shouldn’t be can be found in 800 other posts in this forum. Thanks.

It was on ESPN that the Bills released Bledsoe. Am I the only one who thinks that this would be a good match for us?
• After his tenure in Buffalo he cannot expect a BIG MONEY contract (I wouldn’t think so at least), or even necessarily expect to come in as a starter with a new team. This being said if we can get him fairly cheap, I for one, believe he still has some gas left in his tank and probably has something to prove.
• As with Drew Breeze, I think it would help Brooks to have some legitimate competition on the bench or even in camp (as it is right now, I don’t think Aaron is too worried that his current back-ups might over take him, therefore no pressure.)
• If you can give him some protection Drew can be deadly, I know we need to shore up our O line (but unless we trade for Mike Vick - you are going to have to do that anyway.)
• Can it be any worse than bringing in washed up Warner or some young mostly unproven QB. (I have heard a few peeps mention that they thought Volek with Tennesse, Gerard from Jax, Schaub from Atl ,and a few others might be good replacements for Aaron. I have two words for those people: Todd Bouman. Before we got him, when he came in for Culpepper in Minnesota, he looked like a real game breaker, but has looked like a knuckle head since he’s been here.

Just my opinion but if I was GM and the price wasn’t too high I would bring him in, and throw the starting job into an open competition. At the very least I would feel better seeing him on the bench than our current cast of back-up clowns.