What is wrong with this?

GoldenTomb · 03-07-2005, 09:00 AM

I think the QB position you deal with last order of buisness. Its not a need. You have the number one guy in Brooks you have a vet in Bouman and you have 2 number 3 guys you take a chance and develop either to end up being a number two guy or gets good enough to take over the number one spot one day or becomes trade bait.

You don\'t want to go out and get a guy you are going to pay a chunk of change to ride the bench, especially when you have a year coming up where you are going to have to deal with some tough cap decisions.

Hey Emmitt Smith threw a nice TD on us....maybe we could integrate the HB option pass into our normal play rotation. We could really get our bang for the buck with Deuce and solve the Brooks problem too. Two birds with one stone!

03-07-2005, 09:00 AM	#11
GoldenTomb 500th Post Join Date: Jan 2004 Posts: 591	What is wrong with this? I think the QB position you deal with last order of buisness. Its not a need. You have the number one guy in Brooks you have a vet in Bouman and you have 2 number 3 guys you take a chance and develop either to end up being a number two guy or gets good enough to take over the number one spot one day or becomes trade bait. You don\'t want to go out and get a guy you are going to pay a chunk of change to ride the bench, especially when you have a year coming up where you are going to have to deal with some tough cap decisions. Hey Emmitt Smith threw a nice TD on us....maybe we could integrate the HB option pass into our normal play rotation. We could really get our bang for the buck with Deuce and solve the Brooks problem too. Two birds with one stone!
GoldenTomb 500th Post Join Date: Jan 2004 Posts: 591