|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; Yes! That's exactly what I've been screaming for years. Just get pressures. Everyone is always so caught up in sack numbers. Sacks are important, they change field position, but as long as you are disrupting the QB and getting off ...
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
09-01-2016, 10:33 AM | #11 |
1000 Posts +
|
Re: Krueger needs to "X" to be deemed a successful signing?
Yes! That's exactly what I've been screaming for years. Just get pressures. Everyone is always so caught up in sack numbers. Sacks are important, they change field position, but as long as you are disrupting the QB and getting off the field, that's the main thing.
Will Smith, rest his soul, but he was one of those guys who might give you double digit sacks but he wasn't consistently in the backfield. I'll gladly take less sacks if it means more pressure. I'd like to have the best of both worlds, but we have to take what we can get. edit- I was attempting to reply to you, K Major. Apparently I botched it. |
If I had a nickel for every time I heard that, the NFL would fine and suspend me.
|
|
Latest Blogs | |
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn
Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey
CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey |
09-01-2016, 10:36 AM | #12 |
1000 Posts +
|
Re: Krueger needs to "X" to be deemed a successful signing?
Originally Posted by K Major
Not sure what the difference is between a pressure and a hurry, but I read that he had 50+ pressures last year. So this gives us two proven commodities on each end. If the interior pressure lives up to the hype then it's going to be a rough year for opposing QB's
|
09-01-2016, 10:52 AM | #14 |
5000 POSTS! +
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Grand Haven, Michigan by way of a little Mississippi River town in Louisiana
Posts: 5,893
|
Re: Krueger needs to "X" to be deemed a successful signing?
Solid play is all I could ask for. Containment on the end and pressure. Sacks will come with collapsing the pocket.
|
09-01-2016, 10:55 AM | #15 |
5000 POSTS! +
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 9,048
|
Re: Krueger needs to "X" to be deemed a successful signing?
Double digit sacks and I'm happy
|
09-01-2016, 10:56 AM | #16 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,627
|
Re: Krueger needs to "X" to be deemed a successful signing?
No difference in a pressure and a hurry, it just gives the stat pedants something to plug into a spreadsheet.
I vote Nightmare On Poydras Street to be a crowd sign someone makes for a prime time game this year. Good job Chris |
09-01-2016, 10:58 AM | #17 |
5000 POSTS! +
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 9,048
|
Re: Krueger needs to "X" to be deemed a successful signing?
Originally Posted by burningmetal
I think if you are able to get sacks then hurrying comes with the territory .
|
09-01-2016, 11:25 AM | #18 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: SW Ohio
Posts: 4,645
|
Re: Krueger needs to "X" to be deemed a successful signing?
Just contribute to wins. If the Saints win and he is a contributing factor (sacks, pressures, stops, and/or leadership) then it will be considered a fantastic signing.
|
09-01-2016, 12:21 PM | #19 |
Resident Swede
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Märsta, Sweden
Posts: 8,025
|
Re: Krueger needs to "X" to be deemed a successful signing?
If he just knocks the snot out off Scam Newton and Ratty Ice he'll be allright in my book.
Oh and that whatshisface in Tampa Bay too... |
|
|
LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/79433-krueger-needs-x-deemed-successful-signing.html
|
||||
Posted By | For | Type | Date | Hits |
Krueger needs to "X" to be deemed a successful signing? | This thread | Refback | 09-01-2016 12:04 PM | 2 |
The Latest New Orleans Saints News | SportSpyder | This thread | Refback | 09-01-2016 09:06 AM | 10 |