|
|||||||
Krueger needs to "X" to be deemed a successful signing?
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; 1 year. $3M with a max potential of $5M. What do you expect from Kruger and what type of year does he need to have to be a good signing?...
31Likes |
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
09-01-2016, 08:46 AM
|
#1 |
|
10000 POST CLUB
|
Krueger needs to "X" to be deemed a successful signing?
1 year. $3M with a max potential of $5M.
What do you expect from Kruger and what type of year does he need to have to be a good signing? |
|
|
|
09-01-2016, 08:55 AM
|
#2 |
|
Registered
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Bella vista. Arkansas
Posts: 35
|
Re: Krueger needs to "X" to be deemed a successful signing?
Stay healthy and don't regress. I'd be happy if he just becomes a good rotational piece that's not a liability
|
|
|
|
|
09-01-2016, 08:55 AM
|
#3 |
|
10000 POST CLUB
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Alexandria, La
Posts: 11,303
|
Re: Krueger needs to "X" to be deemed a successful signing?
I think/hope he was signed to start on the opposite side of Jordan. If he starts my bold prediction is that both he and Jordan will have double digit sacks...
|
|
|
|
|
09-01-2016, 08:57 AM
|
#4 |
|
Site Donor 2018
|
Re: Krueger needs to "X" to be deemed a successful signing?
Hell, just keep tweeting all that politically incorrect ranting and keep posting pics of that awesome wifey...
 Seriously... Match Cam Jordan in Pressures/Sacks/Turnovers, at least 80%... |
|
|
|
|
09-01-2016, 09:05 AM
|
#5 |
|
5000 POSTS! +
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Kenner, LA
Posts: 7,935
|
Re: Krueger needs to "X" to be deemed a successful signing?
Give me anywhere from 8 to 12 sacks and we can call it the steal of the year. If he and Cam Jordan can both get about equal sacks and hurries we'll be dangerous.
Kruger-Fairley-Davieson/Rankins-Jordan That's a massively upgraded defensive line. I'm excited. |
|
|
|
|
09-01-2016, 09:07 AM
|
#6 |
|
10000 POST CLUB
|
Re: Krueger needs to "X" to be deemed a successful signing?
Browns were trying to save money and they lost a good player.
I expect PK to be our starting DE by week 3. I think he adds the dimension we've been missing that don't necessarily show up on stat sheets but end up on less 3rd down conversions. Predict 6 1/2 sacks, 2 FF on the year. Top 15 in QB hurries. |
|
|
|
|
09-01-2016, 09:18 AM
|
#7 |
|
10000 POST CLUB
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 11,358
|
Re: Krueger needs to "X" to be deemed a successful signing?
If he can get anywhere near the amount of QB hurries he got and record 6+ sacks I would be happy, 8-12 sacks and i'lll be ecstatic.
|
|
|
|
|
09-01-2016, 09:52 AM
|
#8 |
|
Site Donor 2019
|
Re: Krueger needs to "X" to be deemed a successful signing?
Originally Posted by rezburna
THIS ^^^.
I had to look this up - > Kruger ranked 5th in 2015. 33 defensive hurries (Cam Jordan was 11th w/16). A hurry is a huge disruption of timing for a QB. KRUGER|FAIRLEY|DAVISON|JORDAN ... dude that is a talented D line. Kruger is gonna help our defense tremendously. |
|
|
|
|
09-01-2016, 10:07 AM
|
#10 |
|
5000 POSTS! +
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 6,324
|
Re: Krueger needs to "X" to be deemed a successful signing?
The fact that he is getting starter money is good. Shows that we are committed and that he can play.
I'm guessing he starts right away |
|
|
|
|
«
Finnegan out; Lutz in!
|
Simple, yet multiple and daring: Under Dennis Allen, the Saints want their defense to take the fight to the offense | Saints | theadvocate.com
»
Linear Mode
|
|
LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/79433-krueger-needs-x-deemed-successful-signing.html
|
||||
| Posted By | For | Type | Date | Hits |
| Krueger needs to "X" to be deemed a successful signing? | This thread | Refback | 09-01-2016 12:04 PM | 2 |
| The Latest New Orleans Saints News | SportSpyder | This thread | Refback | 09-01-2016 09:06 AM | 10 |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:55 PM.
